Cargando…

Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement

Drosera, Droseraceae, catch prey with sticky tentacles. Both Australian Drosera allantostigma and widespread D. rotundifolia show three types of anatomically different tentacles: short, peripheral, and snap-tentacles. The latter two are capable of fast movement. This motion was analysed after mechan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ivesic, Caroline, Adlassnig, Wolfram, Koller-Peroutka, Marianne, Kress, Linda, Lang, Ingeborg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233212
_version_ 1784848097309884416
author Ivesic, Caroline
Adlassnig, Wolfram
Koller-Peroutka, Marianne
Kress, Linda
Lang, Ingeborg
author_facet Ivesic, Caroline
Adlassnig, Wolfram
Koller-Peroutka, Marianne
Kress, Linda
Lang, Ingeborg
author_sort Ivesic, Caroline
collection PubMed
description Drosera, Droseraceae, catch prey with sticky tentacles. Both Australian Drosera allantostigma and widespread D. rotundifolia show three types of anatomically different tentacles: short, peripheral, and snap-tentacles. The latter two are capable of fast movement. This motion was analysed after mechanical, chemical, and electrical stimulation with respect to response rate, response time, and angular velocity of bending. Compared to D. rotundifolia, D. allantostigma responds more frequently and faster; the tentacles bend with higher angular velocity. Snap-tentacles have a lower response rate, shorter response time, and faster angular velocity. The response rates for chemical and electrical stimuli are similar, and higher than the rates for mechanical stimulus. The response time is not dependent on stimulus type. The higher motility in D. allantostigma indicates increased dependence on mechanical prey capture, and a reduced role of adhesive mucilage. The same tentacle types are present in both species and show similar motility patterns. The lower response rate of snap-tentacles might be a safety measure against accidental triggering, since the motion of snap-tentacles is irreversible and tissue destructive. Furthermore, tentacles seem to discern stimuli and respond specifically. The established model of stereotypical tentacle movement may not fully explain these observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9740574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97405742022-12-11 Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement Ivesic, Caroline Adlassnig, Wolfram Koller-Peroutka, Marianne Kress, Linda Lang, Ingeborg Plants (Basel) Article Drosera, Droseraceae, catch prey with sticky tentacles. Both Australian Drosera allantostigma and widespread D. rotundifolia show three types of anatomically different tentacles: short, peripheral, and snap-tentacles. The latter two are capable of fast movement. This motion was analysed after mechanical, chemical, and electrical stimulation with respect to response rate, response time, and angular velocity of bending. Compared to D. rotundifolia, D. allantostigma responds more frequently and faster; the tentacles bend with higher angular velocity. Snap-tentacles have a lower response rate, shorter response time, and faster angular velocity. The response rates for chemical and electrical stimuli are similar, and higher than the rates for mechanical stimulus. The response time is not dependent on stimulus type. The higher motility in D. allantostigma indicates increased dependence on mechanical prey capture, and a reduced role of adhesive mucilage. The same tentacle types are present in both species and show similar motility patterns. The lower response rate of snap-tentacles might be a safety measure against accidental triggering, since the motion of snap-tentacles is irreversible and tissue destructive. Furthermore, tentacles seem to discern stimuli and respond specifically. The established model of stereotypical tentacle movement may not fully explain these observations. MDPI 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9740574/ /pubmed/36501252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233212 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ivesic, Caroline
Adlassnig, Wolfram
Koller-Peroutka, Marianne
Kress, Linda
Lang, Ingeborg
Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement
title Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement
title_full Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement
title_fullStr Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement
title_full_unstemmed Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement
title_short Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement
title_sort snatching sundews—analysis of tentacle movement in two species of drosera in terms of response rate, response time, and speed of movement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233212
work_keys_str_mv AT ivesiccaroline snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement
AT adlassnigwolfram snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement
AT kollerperoutkamarianne snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement
AT kresslinda snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement
AT langingeborg snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement