Cargando…
Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement
Drosera, Droseraceae, catch prey with sticky tentacles. Both Australian Drosera allantostigma and widespread D. rotundifolia show three types of anatomically different tentacles: short, peripheral, and snap-tentacles. The latter two are capable of fast movement. This motion was analysed after mechan...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233212 |
_version_ | 1784848097309884416 |
---|---|
author | Ivesic, Caroline Adlassnig, Wolfram Koller-Peroutka, Marianne Kress, Linda Lang, Ingeborg |
author_facet | Ivesic, Caroline Adlassnig, Wolfram Koller-Peroutka, Marianne Kress, Linda Lang, Ingeborg |
author_sort | Ivesic, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drosera, Droseraceae, catch prey with sticky tentacles. Both Australian Drosera allantostigma and widespread D. rotundifolia show three types of anatomically different tentacles: short, peripheral, and snap-tentacles. The latter two are capable of fast movement. This motion was analysed after mechanical, chemical, and electrical stimulation with respect to response rate, response time, and angular velocity of bending. Compared to D. rotundifolia, D. allantostigma responds more frequently and faster; the tentacles bend with higher angular velocity. Snap-tentacles have a lower response rate, shorter response time, and faster angular velocity. The response rates for chemical and electrical stimuli are similar, and higher than the rates for mechanical stimulus. The response time is not dependent on stimulus type. The higher motility in D. allantostigma indicates increased dependence on mechanical prey capture, and a reduced role of adhesive mucilage. The same tentacle types are present in both species and show similar motility patterns. The lower response rate of snap-tentacles might be a safety measure against accidental triggering, since the motion of snap-tentacles is irreversible and tissue destructive. Furthermore, tentacles seem to discern stimuli and respond specifically. The established model of stereotypical tentacle movement may not fully explain these observations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9740574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97405742022-12-11 Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement Ivesic, Caroline Adlassnig, Wolfram Koller-Peroutka, Marianne Kress, Linda Lang, Ingeborg Plants (Basel) Article Drosera, Droseraceae, catch prey with sticky tentacles. Both Australian Drosera allantostigma and widespread D. rotundifolia show three types of anatomically different tentacles: short, peripheral, and snap-tentacles. The latter two are capable of fast movement. This motion was analysed after mechanical, chemical, and electrical stimulation with respect to response rate, response time, and angular velocity of bending. Compared to D. rotundifolia, D. allantostigma responds more frequently and faster; the tentacles bend with higher angular velocity. Snap-tentacles have a lower response rate, shorter response time, and faster angular velocity. The response rates for chemical and electrical stimuli are similar, and higher than the rates for mechanical stimulus. The response time is not dependent on stimulus type. The higher motility in D. allantostigma indicates increased dependence on mechanical prey capture, and a reduced role of adhesive mucilage. The same tentacle types are present in both species and show similar motility patterns. The lower response rate of snap-tentacles might be a safety measure against accidental triggering, since the motion of snap-tentacles is irreversible and tissue destructive. Furthermore, tentacles seem to discern stimuli and respond specifically. The established model of stereotypical tentacle movement may not fully explain these observations. MDPI 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9740574/ /pubmed/36501252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233212 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ivesic, Caroline Adlassnig, Wolfram Koller-Peroutka, Marianne Kress, Linda Lang, Ingeborg Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement |
title | Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement |
title_full | Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement |
title_fullStr | Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement |
title_full_unstemmed | Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement |
title_short | Snatching Sundews—Analysis of Tentacle Movement in Two Species of Drosera in Terms of Response Rate, Response Time, and Speed of Movement |
title_sort | snatching sundews—analysis of tentacle movement in two species of drosera in terms of response rate, response time, and speed of movement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ivesiccaroline snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement AT adlassnigwolfram snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement AT kollerperoutkamarianne snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement AT kresslinda snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement AT langingeborg snatchingsundewsanalysisoftentaclemovementintwospeciesofdroseraintermsofresponserateresponsetimeandspeedofmovement |