Cargando…

Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L.

In this study, the extraction conditions for selenium-enriched rape protein (SEP) were optimized by applying a response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) model, and then, the optimal conditions were obtained using a genetic algorithm (GA). Then, the antioxidant power of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Tao, Lai, Hongkun, Cao, Zimo, Niu, Yinyin, Xiang, Jiqian, Zhang, Chi, Shang, Longchen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11233823
_version_ 1784848173622099968
author Yang, Tao
Lai, Hongkun
Cao, Zimo
Niu, Yinyin
Xiang, Jiqian
Zhang, Chi
Shang, Longchen
author_facet Yang, Tao
Lai, Hongkun
Cao, Zimo
Niu, Yinyin
Xiang, Jiqian
Zhang, Chi
Shang, Longchen
author_sort Yang, Tao
collection PubMed
description In this study, the extraction conditions for selenium-enriched rape protein (SEP) were optimized by applying a response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) model, and then, the optimal conditions were obtained using a genetic algorithm (GA). Then, the antioxidant power of the SEP was examined by using the DPPH, ABTS, and CCK-8 (Cell Counting Kit-8), and its anticancer activities were explored by conducting a cell migration test. The results showed that compared with the RSM model, the ANN model was more accurate with a higher determination coefficient and fewer errors when it was applied to optimize the extraction method. The data obtained for SEP using a GA were as follows: the extraction temperature was 59.4 °C, the extraction time was 3.0 h, the alkaline concentration was 0.24 mol/L, the liquid-to-material ratio was 65.2 mL/g, and the predicted content of protein was 58.04 mg/g. The protein was extracted under the conditions obtained by the GA; the real content of protein was 57.69 mg/g, and the protein yield was 61.71%. Finally, as the concentration of the selenium-containing protein increased, it showed increased ability in scavenging free radicals and was influential in inhibiting the proliferation and migration of HepG2 cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9740868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97408682022-12-11 Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L. Yang, Tao Lai, Hongkun Cao, Zimo Niu, Yinyin Xiang, Jiqian Zhang, Chi Shang, Longchen Foods Article In this study, the extraction conditions for selenium-enriched rape protein (SEP) were optimized by applying a response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) model, and then, the optimal conditions were obtained using a genetic algorithm (GA). Then, the antioxidant power of the SEP was examined by using the DPPH, ABTS, and CCK-8 (Cell Counting Kit-8), and its anticancer activities were explored by conducting a cell migration test. The results showed that compared with the RSM model, the ANN model was more accurate with a higher determination coefficient and fewer errors when it was applied to optimize the extraction method. The data obtained for SEP using a GA were as follows: the extraction temperature was 59.4 °C, the extraction time was 3.0 h, the alkaline concentration was 0.24 mol/L, the liquid-to-material ratio was 65.2 mL/g, and the predicted content of protein was 58.04 mg/g. The protein was extracted under the conditions obtained by the GA; the real content of protein was 57.69 mg/g, and the protein yield was 61.71%. Finally, as the concentration of the selenium-containing protein increased, it showed increased ability in scavenging free radicals and was influential in inhibiting the proliferation and migration of HepG2 cells. MDPI 2022-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9740868/ /pubmed/36496631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11233823 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Tao
Lai, Hongkun
Cao, Zimo
Niu, Yinyin
Xiang, Jiqian
Zhang, Chi
Shang, Longchen
Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L.
title Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L.
title_full Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L.
title_fullStr Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L.
title_short Comparison of an Artificial Neural Network and a Response Surface Model during the Extraction of Selenium-Containing Protein from Selenium-Enriched Brassica napus L.
title_sort comparison of an artificial neural network and a response surface model during the extraction of selenium-containing protein from selenium-enriched brassica napus l.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11233823
work_keys_str_mv AT yangtao comparisonofanartificialneuralnetworkandaresponsesurfacemodelduringtheextractionofseleniumcontainingproteinfromseleniumenrichedbrassicanapusl
AT laihongkun comparisonofanartificialneuralnetworkandaresponsesurfacemodelduringtheextractionofseleniumcontainingproteinfromseleniumenrichedbrassicanapusl
AT caozimo comparisonofanartificialneuralnetworkandaresponsesurfacemodelduringtheextractionofseleniumcontainingproteinfromseleniumenrichedbrassicanapusl
AT niuyinyin comparisonofanartificialneuralnetworkandaresponsesurfacemodelduringtheextractionofseleniumcontainingproteinfromseleniumenrichedbrassicanapusl
AT xiangjiqian comparisonofanartificialneuralnetworkandaresponsesurfacemodelduringtheextractionofseleniumcontainingproteinfromseleniumenrichedbrassicanapusl
AT zhangchi comparisonofanartificialneuralnetworkandaresponsesurfacemodelduringtheextractionofseleniumcontainingproteinfromseleniumenrichedbrassicanapusl
AT shanglongchen comparisonofanartificialneuralnetworkandaresponsesurfacemodelduringtheextractionofseleniumcontainingproteinfromseleniumenrichedbrassicanapusl