Cargando…
Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Biodegradable polymeric fibrous non-woven materials are widely used type of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Their morphology and properties could be controlled by composition and fabrication technology. This work is aimed at development of fibrous scaffolds from a multicomponent polymeric system c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14235254 |
_version_ | 1784848195337060352 |
---|---|
author | Demina, Tatiana S. Bolbasov, Evgeniy N. Peshkova, Maria A. Efremov, Yuri M. Bikmulina, Polina Y. Birdibekova, Aisylu V. Popyrina, Tatiana N. Kosheleva, Nastasia V. Tverdokhlebov, Sergei I. Timashev, Peter S. Akopova, Tatiana A. |
author_facet | Demina, Tatiana S. Bolbasov, Evgeniy N. Peshkova, Maria A. Efremov, Yuri M. Bikmulina, Polina Y. Birdibekova, Aisylu V. Popyrina, Tatiana N. Kosheleva, Nastasia V. Tverdokhlebov, Sergei I. Timashev, Peter S. Akopova, Tatiana A. |
author_sort | Demina, Tatiana S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biodegradable polymeric fibrous non-woven materials are widely used type of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Their morphology and properties could be controlled by composition and fabrication technology. This work is aimed at development of fibrous scaffolds from a multicomponent polymeric system containing biodegradable synthetic (polylactide, polycaprolactone) and natural (gelatin, chitosan) components using different methods of non-woven mats fabrication: electrospinning and electro-assisted solution blow spinning. The effect of the fabrication technique of the fibrous materials onto their morphology and properties, including the ability to support adhesion and growth of cells, was evaluated. The mats fabricated using electrospinning technology consist of randomly oriented monofilament fibers, while application of solution blow spinning gave a rise to chaotically arranged multifilament fibers. Cytocompatibility of all fabricated fibrous mats was confirmed using in vitro analysis of metabolic activity, proliferative capacity and morphology of NIH 3T3 cell line. Live/Dead assay revealed the formation of the highest number of cell–cell contacts in the case of multifilament sample formed by electro-assisted solution blow spinning technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9740951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97409512022-12-11 Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Demina, Tatiana S. Bolbasov, Evgeniy N. Peshkova, Maria A. Efremov, Yuri M. Bikmulina, Polina Y. Birdibekova, Aisylu V. Popyrina, Tatiana N. Kosheleva, Nastasia V. Tverdokhlebov, Sergei I. Timashev, Peter S. Akopova, Tatiana A. Polymers (Basel) Article Biodegradable polymeric fibrous non-woven materials are widely used type of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Their morphology and properties could be controlled by composition and fabrication technology. This work is aimed at development of fibrous scaffolds from a multicomponent polymeric system containing biodegradable synthetic (polylactide, polycaprolactone) and natural (gelatin, chitosan) components using different methods of non-woven mats fabrication: electrospinning and electro-assisted solution blow spinning. The effect of the fabrication technique of the fibrous materials onto their morphology and properties, including the ability to support adhesion and growth of cells, was evaluated. The mats fabricated using electrospinning technology consist of randomly oriented monofilament fibers, while application of solution blow spinning gave a rise to chaotically arranged multifilament fibers. Cytocompatibility of all fabricated fibrous mats was confirmed using in vitro analysis of metabolic activity, proliferative capacity and morphology of NIH 3T3 cell line. Live/Dead assay revealed the formation of the highest number of cell–cell contacts in the case of multifilament sample formed by electro-assisted solution blow spinning technology. MDPI 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9740951/ /pubmed/36501648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14235254 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Demina, Tatiana S. Bolbasov, Evgeniy N. Peshkova, Maria A. Efremov, Yuri M. Bikmulina, Polina Y. Birdibekova, Aisylu V. Popyrina, Tatiana N. Kosheleva, Nastasia V. Tverdokhlebov, Sergei I. Timashev, Peter S. Akopova, Tatiana A. Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering |
title | Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering |
title_full | Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering |
title_short | Electrospinning vs. Electro-Assisted Solution Blow Spinning for Fabrication of Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | electrospinning vs. electro-assisted solution blow spinning for fabrication of fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14235254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deminatatianas electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT bolbasovevgeniyn electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT peshkovamariaa electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT efremovyurim electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT bikmulinapolinay electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT birdibekovaaisyluv electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT popyrinatatianan electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT koshelevanastasiav electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT tverdokhlebovsergeii electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT timashevpeters electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering AT akopovatatianaa electrospinningvselectroassistedsolutionblowspinningforfabricationoffibrousscaffoldsfortissueengineering |