Cargando…

Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of PET/CT scans in the preoperative identification of lymph node metastases (LNM) and compare them with postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 87 patients with a solitary lung nodule or biopsy-proven non...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bedetti, Benedetta, Schnorr, Philipp, May, Sarah, Ruhlmann, Jürgen, Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat, Essler, Markus, Quaas, Alexander, Büttner, Reinhard, Schmidt, Joachim, Palmedo, Holger, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Wilhelm, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237215
_version_ 1784848223103352832
author Bedetti, Benedetta
Schnorr, Philipp
May, Sarah
Ruhlmann, Jürgen
Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
Essler, Markus
Quaas, Alexander
Büttner, Reinhard
Schmidt, Joachim
Palmedo, Holger
Ko, Yon-Dschun
Wilhelm, Kai
author_facet Bedetti, Benedetta
Schnorr, Philipp
May, Sarah
Ruhlmann, Jürgen
Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
Essler, Markus
Quaas, Alexander
Büttner, Reinhard
Schmidt, Joachim
Palmedo, Holger
Ko, Yon-Dschun
Wilhelm, Kai
author_sort Bedetti, Benedetta
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of PET/CT scans in the preoperative identification of lymph node metastases (LNM) and compare them with postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 87 patients with a solitary lung nodule or biopsy-proven non-small cell lung cancer treated in our institution from 2009 to 2015. Patients were divided into two groups and four subgroups, depending on pre- and postoperative findings. Results: According to our analysis, PET/CT scan has a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 88.89%, a positive predictive value of 63.16%, and a negative predictive value of 82.35%. Among the patients, 13.8% were downstaged in PET-CT, while 8% were upstaged. In 78.2% of cases, the PET/CT evaluation was consistent with the histology. Metastases without extracapsular invasion were seldom recognized on PET/CT. Conclusions: This analysis showed the significance of extracapsular tumor invasion, which causes an inflammatory reaction, on LNM, which is probably responsible for preoperative false-positive findings. In conclusion, PET/CT scans are very effective in identifying patients without tumors. Furthermore, it is highly probable that patients with negative findings are free of disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9741057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97410572022-12-11 Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Bedetti, Benedetta Schnorr, Philipp May, Sarah Ruhlmann, Jürgen Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Essler, Markus Quaas, Alexander Büttner, Reinhard Schmidt, Joachim Palmedo, Holger Ko, Yon-Dschun Wilhelm, Kai J Clin Med Article Background: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of PET/CT scans in the preoperative identification of lymph node metastases (LNM) and compare them with postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 87 patients with a solitary lung nodule or biopsy-proven non-small cell lung cancer treated in our institution from 2009 to 2015. Patients were divided into two groups and four subgroups, depending on pre- and postoperative findings. Results: According to our analysis, PET/CT scan has a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 88.89%, a positive predictive value of 63.16%, and a negative predictive value of 82.35%. Among the patients, 13.8% were downstaged in PET-CT, while 8% were upstaged. In 78.2% of cases, the PET/CT evaluation was consistent with the histology. Metastases without extracapsular invasion were seldom recognized on PET/CT. Conclusions: This analysis showed the significance of extracapsular tumor invasion, which causes an inflammatory reaction, on LNM, which is probably responsible for preoperative false-positive findings. In conclusion, PET/CT scans are very effective in identifying patients without tumors. Furthermore, it is highly probable that patients with negative findings are free of disease. MDPI 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9741057/ /pubmed/36498790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237215 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bedetti, Benedetta
Schnorr, Philipp
May, Sarah
Ruhlmann, Jürgen
Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
Essler, Markus
Quaas, Alexander
Büttner, Reinhard
Schmidt, Joachim
Palmedo, Holger
Ko, Yon-Dschun
Wilhelm, Kai
Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort multidisciplinary postoperative validation of (18)f-fdg pet/ct scan in nodal staging of resected non-small cell lung cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237215
work_keys_str_mv AT bedettibenedetta multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT schnorrphilipp multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT maysarah multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ruhlmannjurgen multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ahmadzadehfarhojjat multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT esslermarkus multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT quaasalexander multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT buttnerreinhard multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT schmidtjoachim multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT palmedoholger multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT koyondschun multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT wilhelmkai multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer