Cargando…
Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Background: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of PET/CT scans in the preoperative identification of lymph node metastases (LNM) and compare them with postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 87 patients with a solitary lung nodule or biopsy-proven non...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237215 |
_version_ | 1784848223103352832 |
---|---|
author | Bedetti, Benedetta Schnorr, Philipp May, Sarah Ruhlmann, Jürgen Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Essler, Markus Quaas, Alexander Büttner, Reinhard Schmidt, Joachim Palmedo, Holger Ko, Yon-Dschun Wilhelm, Kai |
author_facet | Bedetti, Benedetta Schnorr, Philipp May, Sarah Ruhlmann, Jürgen Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Essler, Markus Quaas, Alexander Büttner, Reinhard Schmidt, Joachim Palmedo, Holger Ko, Yon-Dschun Wilhelm, Kai |
author_sort | Bedetti, Benedetta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of PET/CT scans in the preoperative identification of lymph node metastases (LNM) and compare them with postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 87 patients with a solitary lung nodule or biopsy-proven non-small cell lung cancer treated in our institution from 2009 to 2015. Patients were divided into two groups and four subgroups, depending on pre- and postoperative findings. Results: According to our analysis, PET/CT scan has a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 88.89%, a positive predictive value of 63.16%, and a negative predictive value of 82.35%. Among the patients, 13.8% were downstaged in PET-CT, while 8% were upstaged. In 78.2% of cases, the PET/CT evaluation was consistent with the histology. Metastases without extracapsular invasion were seldom recognized on PET/CT. Conclusions: This analysis showed the significance of extracapsular tumor invasion, which causes an inflammatory reaction, on LNM, which is probably responsible for preoperative false-positive findings. In conclusion, PET/CT scans are very effective in identifying patients without tumors. Furthermore, it is highly probable that patients with negative findings are free of disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9741057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97410572022-12-11 Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Bedetti, Benedetta Schnorr, Philipp May, Sarah Ruhlmann, Jürgen Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Essler, Markus Quaas, Alexander Büttner, Reinhard Schmidt, Joachim Palmedo, Holger Ko, Yon-Dschun Wilhelm, Kai J Clin Med Article Background: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of PET/CT scans in the preoperative identification of lymph node metastases (LNM) and compare them with postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 87 patients with a solitary lung nodule or biopsy-proven non-small cell lung cancer treated in our institution from 2009 to 2015. Patients were divided into two groups and four subgroups, depending on pre- and postoperative findings. Results: According to our analysis, PET/CT scan has a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 88.89%, a positive predictive value of 63.16%, and a negative predictive value of 82.35%. Among the patients, 13.8% were downstaged in PET-CT, while 8% were upstaged. In 78.2% of cases, the PET/CT evaluation was consistent with the histology. Metastases without extracapsular invasion were seldom recognized on PET/CT. Conclusions: This analysis showed the significance of extracapsular tumor invasion, which causes an inflammatory reaction, on LNM, which is probably responsible for preoperative false-positive findings. In conclusion, PET/CT scans are very effective in identifying patients without tumors. Furthermore, it is highly probable that patients with negative findings are free of disease. MDPI 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9741057/ /pubmed/36498790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237215 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bedetti, Benedetta Schnorr, Philipp May, Sarah Ruhlmann, Jürgen Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Essler, Markus Quaas, Alexander Büttner, Reinhard Schmidt, Joachim Palmedo, Holger Ko, Yon-Dschun Wilhelm, Kai Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title | Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_full | Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_fullStr | Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_short | Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Nodal Staging of Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_sort | multidisciplinary postoperative validation of (18)f-fdg pet/ct scan in nodal staging of resected non-small cell lung cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bedettibenedetta multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT schnorrphilipp multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT maysarah multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT ruhlmannjurgen multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT ahmadzadehfarhojjat multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT esslermarkus multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT quaasalexander multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT buttnerreinhard multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT schmidtjoachim multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT palmedoholger multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT koyondschun multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer AT wilhelmkai multidisciplinarypostoperativevalidationof18ffdgpetctscaninnodalstagingofresectednonsmallcelllungcancer |