Cargando…
Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence
BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a prognostic indicator for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The real‐world data of ALK TKIs remain a major concern. METHODS: Patients with ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC, who received cri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4834 |
_version_ | 1784848432846864384 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yurong Shen, Shujing Hu, Peizhu Geng, Di Zheng, Ruipan Li, Xingya |
author_facet | Wang, Yurong Shen, Shujing Hu, Peizhu Geng, Di Zheng, Ruipan Li, Xingya |
author_sort | Wang, Yurong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a prognostic indicator for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The real‐world data of ALK TKIs remain a major concern. METHODS: Patients with ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib or alectinib treatment in first line, were retrospectively reviewed. ALK status was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical outcomes have been comprehensively analyzed between TKIs, ALK fusions, EML4‐ALK variants, and next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure. RESULTS: One hundred sixty‐eight patients were successively enrolled (crizotinib, n = 109; alctinib, n = 59). Alectinib showed consistent superiority in progressive‐free survival (PFS) over crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.24–0.77, p = 0.004). Multivariate Cox regression showed chemotherapy (CT) prior to TKIs or synchronous chemotherapy seemed not to improve PFS compared to ALK inhibitors alone (p > 0.05). And, alectinib was superior to crizotinib in prolonging intracranial PFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03–0.49, p = 0.003). Patients in EML4 group had a better prognosis than those in non‐EML4 group after alectinib administration (HR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03–0.60, p = 0.009). TP53 co‐mutations were relatively common (34.0%) and associated with adverse outcome in ALK‐positive patients (adjusted HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.00–4.92, p = 0.049). After crizotinib failure, 33 patients received a sequential application of next‐generation ALK TKIs. Compared to ceritinib and brigatinib, alectinib might have better PFS (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results revealed alectinib had better PFS and higher intracranial efficacy compared to crizotinib in ALK‐positive NSCLC, and might improve PFS by comparison with ceritinib and brigatinib after crizotinib failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9741982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97419822022-12-13 Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence Wang, Yurong Shen, Shujing Hu, Peizhu Geng, Di Zheng, Ruipan Li, Xingya Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a prognostic indicator for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The real‐world data of ALK TKIs remain a major concern. METHODS: Patients with ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib or alectinib treatment in first line, were retrospectively reviewed. ALK status was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical outcomes have been comprehensively analyzed between TKIs, ALK fusions, EML4‐ALK variants, and next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure. RESULTS: One hundred sixty‐eight patients were successively enrolled (crizotinib, n = 109; alctinib, n = 59). Alectinib showed consistent superiority in progressive‐free survival (PFS) over crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.24–0.77, p = 0.004). Multivariate Cox regression showed chemotherapy (CT) prior to TKIs or synchronous chemotherapy seemed not to improve PFS compared to ALK inhibitors alone (p > 0.05). And, alectinib was superior to crizotinib in prolonging intracranial PFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03–0.49, p = 0.003). Patients in EML4 group had a better prognosis than those in non‐EML4 group after alectinib administration (HR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03–0.60, p = 0.009). TP53 co‐mutations were relatively common (34.0%) and associated with adverse outcome in ALK‐positive patients (adjusted HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.00–4.92, p = 0.049). After crizotinib failure, 33 patients received a sequential application of next‐generation ALK TKIs. Compared to ceritinib and brigatinib, alectinib might have better PFS (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results revealed alectinib had better PFS and higher intracranial efficacy compared to crizotinib in ALK‐positive NSCLC, and might improve PFS by comparison with ceritinib and brigatinib after crizotinib failure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9741982/ /pubmed/35616090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4834 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Wang, Yurong Shen, Shujing Hu, Peizhu Geng, Di Zheng, Ruipan Li, Xingya Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence |
title | Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence |
title_full | Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence |
title_fullStr | Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence |
title_short | Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence |
title_sort | alectinib versus crizotinib in alk‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation tkis after crizotinib failure: real‐world evidence |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyurong alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence AT shenshujing alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence AT hupeizhu alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence AT gengdi alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence AT zhengruipan alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence AT lixingya alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence |