Cargando…

Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a prognostic indicator for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The real‐world data of ALK TKIs remain a major concern. METHODS: Patients with ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC, who received cri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yurong, Shen, Shujing, Hu, Peizhu, Geng, Di, Zheng, Ruipan, Li, Xingya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4834
_version_ 1784848432846864384
author Wang, Yurong
Shen, Shujing
Hu, Peizhu
Geng, Di
Zheng, Ruipan
Li, Xingya
author_facet Wang, Yurong
Shen, Shujing
Hu, Peizhu
Geng, Di
Zheng, Ruipan
Li, Xingya
author_sort Wang, Yurong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a prognostic indicator for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The real‐world data of ALK TKIs remain a major concern. METHODS: Patients with ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib or alectinib treatment in first line, were retrospectively reviewed. ALK status was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical outcomes have been comprehensively analyzed between TKIs, ALK fusions, EML4‐ALK variants, and next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure. RESULTS: One hundred sixty‐eight patients were successively enrolled (crizotinib, n = 109; alctinib, n = 59). Alectinib showed consistent superiority in progressive‐free survival (PFS) over crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.24–0.77, p = 0.004). Multivariate Cox regression showed chemotherapy (CT) prior to TKIs or synchronous chemotherapy seemed not to improve PFS compared to ALK inhibitors alone (p > 0.05). And, alectinib was superior to crizotinib in prolonging intracranial PFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03–0.49, p = 0.003). Patients in EML4 group had a better prognosis than those in non‐EML4 group after alectinib administration (HR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03–0.60, p = 0.009). TP53 co‐mutations were relatively common (34.0%) and associated with adverse outcome in ALK‐positive patients (adjusted HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.00–4.92, p = 0.049). After crizotinib failure, 33 patients received a sequential application of next‐generation ALK TKIs. Compared to ceritinib and brigatinib, alectinib might have better PFS (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results revealed alectinib had better PFS and higher intracranial efficacy compared to crizotinib in ALK‐positive NSCLC, and might improve PFS by comparison with ceritinib and brigatinib after crizotinib failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9741982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97419822022-12-13 Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence Wang, Yurong Shen, Shujing Hu, Peizhu Geng, Di Zheng, Ruipan Li, Xingya Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a prognostic indicator for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The real‐world data of ALK TKIs remain a major concern. METHODS: Patients with ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib or alectinib treatment in first line, were retrospectively reviewed. ALK status was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical outcomes have been comprehensively analyzed between TKIs, ALK fusions, EML4‐ALK variants, and next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure. RESULTS: One hundred sixty‐eight patients were successively enrolled (crizotinib, n = 109; alctinib, n = 59). Alectinib showed consistent superiority in progressive‐free survival (PFS) over crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.24–0.77, p = 0.004). Multivariate Cox regression showed chemotherapy (CT) prior to TKIs or synchronous chemotherapy seemed not to improve PFS compared to ALK inhibitors alone (p > 0.05). And, alectinib was superior to crizotinib in prolonging intracranial PFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03–0.49, p = 0.003). Patients in EML4 group had a better prognosis than those in non‐EML4 group after alectinib administration (HR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03–0.60, p = 0.009). TP53 co‐mutations were relatively common (34.0%) and associated with adverse outcome in ALK‐positive patients (adjusted HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.00–4.92, p = 0.049). After crizotinib failure, 33 patients received a sequential application of next‐generation ALK TKIs. Compared to ceritinib and brigatinib, alectinib might have better PFS (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results revealed alectinib had better PFS and higher intracranial efficacy compared to crizotinib in ALK‐positive NSCLC, and might improve PFS by comparison with ceritinib and brigatinib after crizotinib failure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9741982/ /pubmed/35616090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4834 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Wang, Yurong
Shen, Shujing
Hu, Peizhu
Geng, Di
Zheng, Ruipan
Li, Xingya
Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence
title Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence
title_full Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence
title_fullStr Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence
title_full_unstemmed Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence
title_short Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real‐world evidence
title_sort alectinib versus crizotinib in alk‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and comparison of next‐generation tkis after crizotinib failure: real‐world evidence
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9741982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4834
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyurong alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence
AT shenshujing alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence
AT hupeizhu alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence
AT gengdi alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence
AT zhengruipan alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence
AT lixingya alectinibversuscrizotinibinalkpositiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerandcomparisonofnextgenerationtkisaftercrizotinibfailurerealworldevidence