Cargando…

Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Subspecialization with dedicated perioperative teams has become common practice in some surgical disciplines. While surgeon experience, the number of surgeons involved, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are known factors affecting the outcome after microsurgical breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speck, Nicole E., Dreier, Kathrin, Fluetsch, Andrin, Babst, Doris, Lardi, Alessia M., Farhadi, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518805
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-295
_version_ 1784848449393393664
author Speck, Nicole E.
Dreier, Kathrin
Fluetsch, Andrin
Babst, Doris
Lardi, Alessia M.
Farhadi, Jian
author_facet Speck, Nicole E.
Dreier, Kathrin
Fluetsch, Andrin
Babst, Doris
Lardi, Alessia M.
Farhadi, Jian
author_sort Speck, Nicole E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Subspecialization with dedicated perioperative teams has become common practice in some surgical disciplines. While surgeon experience, the number of surgeons involved, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are known factors affecting the outcome after microsurgical breast reconstruction, the impact of the perioperative team has not been studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study consisting of a chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from January 2019–April 2020. Surgery was performed by three microsurgeons at two institutions with different perioperative teams—one being a small clinic [private clinic (PC), 33 beds] and the other being a larger hospital [corporate hospital (CH), 335 beds]. Patients were grouped into two cohorts according to the institution where surgery was performed. The primary outcomes studied were frequency of revision surgery, flap loss and patient length-of-stay (LOS). RESULTS: One hundred and fifty microsurgical breast reconstructions were performed in 125 patients. Demographic data [age, body mass index (BMI), current tobacco use, donor site] was found statistically comparable between both cohorts. In the PC cohort with fewer perioperative care providers, lower rates of revision surgery and flap loss were observed (P value =0.009 and 0.04, respectively). LOS was not significantly different between the two cohorts (P value =0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of microsurgical breast reconstruction depends on multiple factors. In this study, fewer flap complications occurred at the small clinic. One reason among others might be the lower number of perioperative care providers involved and hence higher likelihood of sharing microsurgical cases, which facilitates routine and ensures less variability in care. The value of perioperative team subspecialization in microsurgical breast reconstruction needs to be assessed in prospective studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9742050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97420502022-12-13 Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study Speck, Nicole E. Dreier, Kathrin Fluetsch, Andrin Babst, Doris Lardi, Alessia M. Farhadi, Jian Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Subspecialization with dedicated perioperative teams has become common practice in some surgical disciplines. While surgeon experience, the number of surgeons involved, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are known factors affecting the outcome after microsurgical breast reconstruction, the impact of the perioperative team has not been studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study consisting of a chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from January 2019–April 2020. Surgery was performed by three microsurgeons at two institutions with different perioperative teams—one being a small clinic [private clinic (PC), 33 beds] and the other being a larger hospital [corporate hospital (CH), 335 beds]. Patients were grouped into two cohorts according to the institution where surgery was performed. The primary outcomes studied were frequency of revision surgery, flap loss and patient length-of-stay (LOS). RESULTS: One hundred and fifty microsurgical breast reconstructions were performed in 125 patients. Demographic data [age, body mass index (BMI), current tobacco use, donor site] was found statistically comparable between both cohorts. In the PC cohort with fewer perioperative care providers, lower rates of revision surgery and flap loss were observed (P value =0.009 and 0.04, respectively). LOS was not significantly different between the two cohorts (P value =0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of microsurgical breast reconstruction depends on multiple factors. In this study, fewer flap complications occurred at the small clinic. One reason among others might be the lower number of perioperative care providers involved and hence higher likelihood of sharing microsurgical cases, which facilitates routine and ensures less variability in care. The value of perioperative team subspecialization in microsurgical breast reconstruction needs to be assessed in prospective studies. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9742050/ /pubmed/36518805 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-295 Text en 2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Speck, Nicole E.
Dreier, Kathrin
Fluetsch, Andrin
Babst, Doris
Lardi, Alessia M.
Farhadi, Jian
Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study
title Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518805
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-295
work_keys_str_mv AT specknicolee comparingcomplicationsandperioperativeteamsinmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dreierkathrin comparingcomplicationsandperioperativeteamsinmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fluetschandrin comparingcomplicationsandperioperativeteamsinmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionretrospectivecohortstudy
AT babstdoris comparingcomplicationsandperioperativeteamsinmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lardialessiam comparingcomplicationsandperioperativeteamsinmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionretrospectivecohortstudy
AT farhadijian comparingcomplicationsandperioperativeteamsinmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionretrospectivecohortstudy