Cargando…

AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives

In May 2022, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) published guidelines regarding interviews for the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. These guidelines recommended virtual interviews and discouraged “hybrid” interviewing. We conducted a survey of orthopaedic program directors (PDs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mun, Frederick, Badin, Daniel, Snow, Morgan, Harris, Andrew B., LaPorte, Dawn M., Aiyer, Amiethab A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518618
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00075
_version_ 1784848458063020032
author Mun, Frederick
Badin, Daniel
Snow, Morgan
Harris, Andrew B.
LaPorte, Dawn M.
Aiyer, Amiethab A.
author_facet Mun, Frederick
Badin, Daniel
Snow, Morgan
Harris, Andrew B.
LaPorte, Dawn M.
Aiyer, Amiethab A.
author_sort Mun, Frederick
collection PubMed
description In May 2022, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) published guidelines regarding interviews for the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. These guidelines recommended virtual interviews and discouraged “hybrid” interviewing. We conducted a survey of orthopaedic program directors (PDs) to understand their perspectives on these new guidelines and their plans for the upcoming cycle. METHODS: A 19-question multicenter, cross-sectional research survey was emailed to 98 PDs (38.8% response rate) through Qualtrics XM. Contact information was obtained from a public national database. RESULTS: Most orthopaedic residency programs (60.5%) were planning on conducting in-person interviews before any AAMC and hospital guidelines, and most (65.8%) will likely be conducting virtual interviews post-guidelines. PDs voiced mixed opinions about virtual interviews (39.4% in favor vs. 47.4% against). PDs were also split on whether forgoing the AAMC guidance would be irresponsible for residency programs (47.4% believe it would be irresponsible vs. 44.8% believe it would not); however, a plurality are in favor of the AAMC's guidance (42.1%). Furthermore, PDs agreed that virtual interviews have disadvantages including favoring top-tier applicants, students from home institutions, and in-person rotators, making ranking applicants and learning about a program's culture more difficult. Most PDs (84.2%) felt that hybrid interviews would disadvantage applicants who would choose the virtual option. CONCLUSION: AAMC guidance seems to be influencing how most orthopaedic surgery programs will conduct residency interviews for the 2022-2023 cycle. Most PDs agreed with the AAMC guidelines but voiced concerns regarding several disadvantages for all 3 proposed interview options (virtual, in-person, and hybrid). Our results indicate that the recent AAMC guidelines may have contributed to a shift in opinions among PDs but are not sufficient to create a consensus on the best practices for residency interviews. Our findings should encourage solutions focused on the deeper systemic issues within the orthopaedic application process in the post-coronavirus 2019 pandemic era.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9742088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97420882022-12-13 AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives Mun, Frederick Badin, Daniel Snow, Morgan Harris, Andrew B. LaPorte, Dawn M. Aiyer, Amiethab A. JB JS Open Access AOA Critical Issues in Education In May 2022, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) published guidelines regarding interviews for the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. These guidelines recommended virtual interviews and discouraged “hybrid” interviewing. We conducted a survey of orthopaedic program directors (PDs) to understand their perspectives on these new guidelines and their plans for the upcoming cycle. METHODS: A 19-question multicenter, cross-sectional research survey was emailed to 98 PDs (38.8% response rate) through Qualtrics XM. Contact information was obtained from a public national database. RESULTS: Most orthopaedic residency programs (60.5%) were planning on conducting in-person interviews before any AAMC and hospital guidelines, and most (65.8%) will likely be conducting virtual interviews post-guidelines. PDs voiced mixed opinions about virtual interviews (39.4% in favor vs. 47.4% against). PDs were also split on whether forgoing the AAMC guidance would be irresponsible for residency programs (47.4% believe it would be irresponsible vs. 44.8% believe it would not); however, a plurality are in favor of the AAMC's guidance (42.1%). Furthermore, PDs agreed that virtual interviews have disadvantages including favoring top-tier applicants, students from home institutions, and in-person rotators, making ranking applicants and learning about a program's culture more difficult. Most PDs (84.2%) felt that hybrid interviews would disadvantage applicants who would choose the virtual option. CONCLUSION: AAMC guidance seems to be influencing how most orthopaedic surgery programs will conduct residency interviews for the 2022-2023 cycle. Most PDs agreed with the AAMC guidelines but voiced concerns regarding several disadvantages for all 3 proposed interview options (virtual, in-person, and hybrid). Our results indicate that the recent AAMC guidelines may have contributed to a shift in opinions among PDs but are not sufficient to create a consensus on the best practices for residency interviews. Our findings should encourage solutions focused on the deeper systemic issues within the orthopaedic application process in the post-coronavirus 2019 pandemic era. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9742088/ /pubmed/36518618 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00075 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CC BY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle AOA Critical Issues in Education
Mun, Frederick
Badin, Daniel
Snow, Morgan
Harris, Andrew B.
LaPorte, Dawn M.
Aiyer, Amiethab A.
AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives
title AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives
title_full AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives
title_fullStr AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives
title_short AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives
title_sort aamc guidance on interviewing for the 2022-2023 residency application cycle: orthopaedic program director perspectives
topic AOA Critical Issues in Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518618
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00075
work_keys_str_mv AT munfrederick aamcguidanceoninterviewingforthe20222023residencyapplicationcycleorthopaedicprogramdirectorperspectives
AT badindaniel aamcguidanceoninterviewingforthe20222023residencyapplicationcycleorthopaedicprogramdirectorperspectives
AT snowmorgan aamcguidanceoninterviewingforthe20222023residencyapplicationcycleorthopaedicprogramdirectorperspectives
AT harrisandrewb aamcguidanceoninterviewingforthe20222023residencyapplicationcycleorthopaedicprogramdirectorperspectives
AT laportedawnm aamcguidanceoninterviewingforthe20222023residencyapplicationcycleorthopaedicprogramdirectorperspectives
AT aiyeramiethaba aamcguidanceoninterviewingforthe20222023residencyapplicationcycleorthopaedicprogramdirectorperspectives