Cargando…

Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is reduced in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), though it is known to aid in symptom and fatigue management. Methods for measuring PA are diverse and the impact of this heterogeneity on study outcomes is unclear. We aimed to clarify this impact by comparing com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polhemus, Ashley, Haag, Christina, Sieber, Chloé, Sylvester, Ramona, Kool, Jan, Gonzenbach, Roman, von Wyl, Viktor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.989658
_version_ 1784848483723771904
author Polhemus, Ashley
Haag, Christina
Sieber, Chloé
Sylvester, Ramona
Kool, Jan
Gonzenbach, Roman
von Wyl, Viktor
author_facet Polhemus, Ashley
Haag, Christina
Sieber, Chloé
Sylvester, Ramona
Kool, Jan
Gonzenbach, Roman
von Wyl, Viktor
author_sort Polhemus, Ashley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is reduced in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), though it is known to aid in symptom and fatigue management. Methods for measuring PA are diverse and the impact of this heterogeneity on study outcomes is unclear. We aimed to clarify this impact by comparing common methods for deriving PA metrics in MS populations. METHODS: First, a rapid review of existing literature identified methods for calculating PA in studies which used the Actigraph GT3X in populations with MS. We then compared methods in a prospective study on 42 persons with MS [EDSS 4.5 (3.5–6)] during a voluntary course of inpatient neurorehabilitation. Mixed-effects linear regression identified methodological factors which influenced PA measurements. Non-parametric hypothesis tests, correlations, and agreement statistics assessed overall and pairwise differences between methods. RESULTS: In the rapid review, searches identified 421 unique records. Sixty-nine records representing 51 eligible studies exhibited substantial heterogeneity in methodology and reporting practices. In a subsequent comparative study, multiple methods for deriving six PA metrics (step count, activity counts, total time in PA, sedentary time, time in light PA, time in moderate to vigorous PA), were identified and directly compared. All metrics were sensitive to methodological factors such as the selected preprocessing filter, data source (vertical vs. vector magnitude counts), and cutpoint. Additionally, sedentary time was sensitive to wear time definitions. Pairwise correlation and agreement between methods varied from weak (minimum correlation: 0.15, minimum agreement: 0.03) to perfect (maximum correlation: 1.00, maximum agreement: 1.00). Methodological factors biased both point estimates of PA and correlations between PA and clinical assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological heterogeneity of existing literature is high, and this heterogeneity may confound studies which use the Actigraph GT3X. Step counts were highly sensitive to the filter used to process raw accelerometer data. Sedentary time was particularly sensitive to methodology, and we recommend using total time in PA instead. Several, though not all, methods for deriving light PA and moderate to vigorous PA yielded nearly identical results. PA metrics based on vertical axis counts tended to outperform those based on vector magnitude counts. Additional research is needed to establish the relative validity of existing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9742246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97422462022-12-13 Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study Polhemus, Ashley Haag, Christina Sieber, Chloé Sylvester, Ramona Kool, Jan Gonzenbach, Roman von Wyl, Viktor Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is reduced in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), though it is known to aid in symptom and fatigue management. Methods for measuring PA are diverse and the impact of this heterogeneity on study outcomes is unclear. We aimed to clarify this impact by comparing common methods for deriving PA metrics in MS populations. METHODS: First, a rapid review of existing literature identified methods for calculating PA in studies which used the Actigraph GT3X in populations with MS. We then compared methods in a prospective study on 42 persons with MS [EDSS 4.5 (3.5–6)] during a voluntary course of inpatient neurorehabilitation. Mixed-effects linear regression identified methodological factors which influenced PA measurements. Non-parametric hypothesis tests, correlations, and agreement statistics assessed overall and pairwise differences between methods. RESULTS: In the rapid review, searches identified 421 unique records. Sixty-nine records representing 51 eligible studies exhibited substantial heterogeneity in methodology and reporting practices. In a subsequent comparative study, multiple methods for deriving six PA metrics (step count, activity counts, total time in PA, sedentary time, time in light PA, time in moderate to vigorous PA), were identified and directly compared. All metrics were sensitive to methodological factors such as the selected preprocessing filter, data source (vertical vs. vector magnitude counts), and cutpoint. Additionally, sedentary time was sensitive to wear time definitions. Pairwise correlation and agreement between methods varied from weak (minimum correlation: 0.15, minimum agreement: 0.03) to perfect (maximum correlation: 1.00, maximum agreement: 1.00). Methodological factors biased both point estimates of PA and correlations between PA and clinical assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological heterogeneity of existing literature is high, and this heterogeneity may confound studies which use the Actigraph GT3X. Step counts were highly sensitive to the filter used to process raw accelerometer data. Sedentary time was particularly sensitive to methodology, and we recommend using total time in PA instead. Several, though not all, methods for deriving light PA and moderate to vigorous PA yielded nearly identical results. PA metrics based on vertical axis counts tended to outperform those based on vector magnitude counts. Additional research is needed to establish the relative validity of existing methods. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9742246/ /pubmed/36518351 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.989658 Text en © 2022 Polhemus, Haag, Sieber, Sylvester, Kool, Gonzenbach and von Wyl. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Sciences
Polhemus, Ashley
Haag, Christina
Sieber, Chloé
Sylvester, Ramona
Kool, Jan
Gonzenbach, Roman
von Wyl, Viktor
Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study
title Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study
title_full Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study
title_fullStr Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study
title_short Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study
title_sort methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the actigraph gt3x in multiple sclerosis: a rapid review and comparative study
topic Rehabilitation Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.989658
work_keys_str_mv AT polhemusashley methodologicalheterogeneitybiasesphysicalactivitymetricsderivedfromtheactigraphgt3xinmultiplesclerosisarapidreviewandcomparativestudy
AT haagchristina methodologicalheterogeneitybiasesphysicalactivitymetricsderivedfromtheactigraphgt3xinmultiplesclerosisarapidreviewandcomparativestudy
AT sieberchloe methodologicalheterogeneitybiasesphysicalactivitymetricsderivedfromtheactigraphgt3xinmultiplesclerosisarapidreviewandcomparativestudy
AT sylvesterramona methodologicalheterogeneitybiasesphysicalactivitymetricsderivedfromtheactigraphgt3xinmultiplesclerosisarapidreviewandcomparativestudy
AT kooljan methodologicalheterogeneitybiasesphysicalactivitymetricsderivedfromtheactigraphgt3xinmultiplesclerosisarapidreviewandcomparativestudy
AT gonzenbachroman methodologicalheterogeneitybiasesphysicalactivitymetricsderivedfromtheactigraphgt3xinmultiplesclerosisarapidreviewandcomparativestudy
AT vonwylviktor methodologicalheterogeneitybiasesphysicalactivitymetricsderivedfromtheactigraphgt3xinmultiplesclerosisarapidreviewandcomparativestudy