Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
Background: Phenylephrine is the first-line drug used to maintain blood pressure in cesarean delivery. However, it poses a high risk of bradycardia and depression of cardiac activity in pregnant women. Consequently, norepinephrine has gained popularity over the recent years, as an alternative to Phe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325 |
_version_ | 1784848499950485504 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Peng He, Hong Zhang, Shan-Shan Liang, Yun Gao, Zi-Jun Yuan, Hui Dong, Bu-Huai |
author_facet | Liu, Peng He, Hong Zhang, Shan-Shan Liang, Yun Gao, Zi-Jun Yuan, Hui Dong, Bu-Huai |
author_sort | Liu, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Phenylephrine is the first-line drug used to maintain blood pressure in cesarean delivery. However, it poses a high risk of bradycardia and depression of cardiac activity in pregnant women. Consequently, norepinephrine has gained popularity over the recent years, as an alternative to Phenylephrine because it is thought that prophylactic use of vasopressors may reduce the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. This systematic review compared the efficacy of both treatments. Methods: We searched the following databases; CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Web of science, clinicaltrials.gov, Medline and Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials comparing the prophylactic efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The search period was from inception to July 2022, and the primary outcome indicator was incidence of bradycardia. Statistical analysis was conducted on Rev manager 5.4, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence from each main finding. Results: A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis. The incidence of bradycardia (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.49, p < 0.00001) and reactive hypertension (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83, p = 0.003) was significantly lower in the norepinephrine (NE) group compared with the phenylephrine (PE) category. In contrast, there were no statistical differences in the umbilical cord blood gas analysis pH values between the groups (arterial: MD = 0.00, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.01, p = 0.22, vein: MD = 0.01, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.02, p = 0.06). The incidence of hypotension, nausea, and vomiting did not differ significantly between the NE and PE groups (hypotension: 23% vs. 18%; nausea: 14% vs. 18%; vomiting: 5% vs. 7%, respectively). Conclusion: Prophylactic use of norepinephrine is safe and effective in maintaining maternal hemodynamics without causing adverse events to either the pregnant woman or fetus. Systematic Review Registration: website https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022347095 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9742368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97423682022-12-13 Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis Liu, Peng He, Hong Zhang, Shan-Shan Liang, Yun Gao, Zi-Jun Yuan, Hui Dong, Bu-Huai Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Phenylephrine is the first-line drug used to maintain blood pressure in cesarean delivery. However, it poses a high risk of bradycardia and depression of cardiac activity in pregnant women. Consequently, norepinephrine has gained popularity over the recent years, as an alternative to Phenylephrine because it is thought that prophylactic use of vasopressors may reduce the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. This systematic review compared the efficacy of both treatments. Methods: We searched the following databases; CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Web of science, clinicaltrials.gov, Medline and Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials comparing the prophylactic efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The search period was from inception to July 2022, and the primary outcome indicator was incidence of bradycardia. Statistical analysis was conducted on Rev manager 5.4, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence from each main finding. Results: A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis. The incidence of bradycardia (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.49, p < 0.00001) and reactive hypertension (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83, p = 0.003) was significantly lower in the norepinephrine (NE) group compared with the phenylephrine (PE) category. In contrast, there were no statistical differences in the umbilical cord blood gas analysis pH values between the groups (arterial: MD = 0.00, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.01, p = 0.22, vein: MD = 0.01, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.02, p = 0.06). The incidence of hypotension, nausea, and vomiting did not differ significantly between the NE and PE groups (hypotension: 23% vs. 18%; nausea: 14% vs. 18%; vomiting: 5% vs. 7%, respectively). Conclusion: Prophylactic use of norepinephrine is safe and effective in maintaining maternal hemodynamics without causing adverse events to either the pregnant woman or fetus. Systematic Review Registration: website https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022347095 Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9742368/ /pubmed/36518675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, He, Zhang, Liang, Gao, Yuan and Dong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Liu, Peng He, Hong Zhang, Shan-Shan Liang, Yun Gao, Zi-Jun Yuan, Hui Dong, Bu-Huai Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liupeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT hehong comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT zhangshanshan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liangyun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT gaozijun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT yuanhui comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT dongbuhuai comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis |