Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Background: Phenylephrine is the first-line drug used to maintain blood pressure in cesarean delivery. However, it poses a high risk of bradycardia and depression of cardiac activity in pregnant women. Consequently, norepinephrine has gained popularity over the recent years, as an alternative to Phe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Peng, He, Hong, Zhang, Shan-Shan, Liang, Yun, Gao, Zi-Jun, Yuan, Hui, Dong, Bu-Huai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518675
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325
_version_ 1784848499950485504
author Liu, Peng
He, Hong
Zhang, Shan-Shan
Liang, Yun
Gao, Zi-Jun
Yuan, Hui
Dong, Bu-Huai
author_facet Liu, Peng
He, Hong
Zhang, Shan-Shan
Liang, Yun
Gao, Zi-Jun
Yuan, Hui
Dong, Bu-Huai
author_sort Liu, Peng
collection PubMed
description Background: Phenylephrine is the first-line drug used to maintain blood pressure in cesarean delivery. However, it poses a high risk of bradycardia and depression of cardiac activity in pregnant women. Consequently, norepinephrine has gained popularity over the recent years, as an alternative to Phenylephrine because it is thought that prophylactic use of vasopressors may reduce the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. This systematic review compared the efficacy of both treatments. Methods: We searched the following databases; CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Web of science, clinicaltrials.gov, Medline and Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials comparing the prophylactic efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The search period was from inception to July 2022, and the primary outcome indicator was incidence of bradycardia. Statistical analysis was conducted on Rev manager 5.4, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence from each main finding. Results: A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis. The incidence of bradycardia (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.49, p < 0.00001) and reactive hypertension (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83, p = 0.003) was significantly lower in the norepinephrine (NE) group compared with the phenylephrine (PE) category. In contrast, there were no statistical differences in the umbilical cord blood gas analysis pH values between the groups (arterial: MD = 0.00, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.01, p = 0.22, vein: MD = 0.01, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.02, p = 0.06). The incidence of hypotension, nausea, and vomiting did not differ significantly between the NE and PE groups (hypotension: 23% vs. 18%; nausea: 14% vs. 18%; vomiting: 5% vs. 7%, respectively). Conclusion: Prophylactic use of norepinephrine is safe and effective in maintaining maternal hemodynamics without causing adverse events to either the pregnant woman or fetus. Systematic Review Registration: website https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022347095
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9742368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97423682022-12-13 Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis Liu, Peng He, Hong Zhang, Shan-Shan Liang, Yun Gao, Zi-Jun Yuan, Hui Dong, Bu-Huai Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Phenylephrine is the first-line drug used to maintain blood pressure in cesarean delivery. However, it poses a high risk of bradycardia and depression of cardiac activity in pregnant women. Consequently, norepinephrine has gained popularity over the recent years, as an alternative to Phenylephrine because it is thought that prophylactic use of vasopressors may reduce the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. This systematic review compared the efficacy of both treatments. Methods: We searched the following databases; CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Web of science, clinicaltrials.gov, Medline and Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials comparing the prophylactic efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The search period was from inception to July 2022, and the primary outcome indicator was incidence of bradycardia. Statistical analysis was conducted on Rev manager 5.4, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence from each main finding. Results: A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis. The incidence of bradycardia (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.49, p < 0.00001) and reactive hypertension (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83, p = 0.003) was significantly lower in the norepinephrine (NE) group compared with the phenylephrine (PE) category. In contrast, there were no statistical differences in the umbilical cord blood gas analysis pH values between the groups (arterial: MD = 0.00, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.01, p = 0.22, vein: MD = 0.01, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.02, p = 0.06). The incidence of hypotension, nausea, and vomiting did not differ significantly between the NE and PE groups (hypotension: 23% vs. 18%; nausea: 14% vs. 18%; vomiting: 5% vs. 7%, respectively). Conclusion: Prophylactic use of norepinephrine is safe and effective in maintaining maternal hemodynamics without causing adverse events to either the pregnant woman or fetus. Systematic Review Registration: website https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022347095 Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9742368/ /pubmed/36518675 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, He, Zhang, Liang, Gao, Yuan and Dong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Liu, Peng
He, Hong
Zhang, Shan-Shan
Liang, Yun
Gao, Zi-Jun
Yuan, Hui
Dong, Bu-Huai
Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518675
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325
work_keys_str_mv AT liupeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT hehong comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT zhangshanshan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT liangyun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT gaozijun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yuanhui comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT dongbuhuai comparativeefficacyandsafetyofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinspinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis