Cargando…
A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer
In this review, we aim to evaluate the current literature on reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA1-IB1). This is a systematic review of the existing literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9743349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36482657 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-9-7 |
_version_ | 1784848706245230592 |
---|---|
author | Nezhat, Farr Erfani, Hadi Nezhat, Camran |
author_facet | Nezhat, Farr Erfani, Hadi Nezhat, Camran |
author_sort | Nezhat, Farr |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this review, we aim to evaluate the current literature on reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA1-IB1). This is a systematic review of the existing literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist to report on fertility-sparing surgery and its outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. Outcomes of interest were subsequent clinical pregnancy rate, reproductive outcomes, and cancer recurrence outcomes. Included in this systematic review were 68 studies encompassing 3,592 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Of these, reproductive outcomes were reported in 1096 pregnancies. The mean clinical pregnancy rate was 53.2%. Those who underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy had the highest clinical pregnancy rate (67.5%). The mean live birth rate was 67.8% in our study. Twenty-one percent of pregnancies after fertility-sparing surgery required assisted reproductive technology. The mean cancer recurrence rate was 3.2%, and the cancer death rate was 0.6% after a median follow-up period of 40.1 months with no statistically significant difference across surgical approaches. Offering fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer is reasonable. Highest clinical pregnancy rate is associated with vaginal radical trachelectomy. Moreover oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive approaches were comparable with abdominal approaches. We encourage detailed preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approach to achieve best outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9743349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97433492022-12-20 A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer Nezhat, Farr Erfani, Hadi Nezhat, Camran J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Review In this review, we aim to evaluate the current literature on reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA1-IB1). This is a systematic review of the existing literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist to report on fertility-sparing surgery and its outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. Outcomes of interest were subsequent clinical pregnancy rate, reproductive outcomes, and cancer recurrence outcomes. Included in this systematic review were 68 studies encompassing 3,592 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Of these, reproductive outcomes were reported in 1096 pregnancies. The mean clinical pregnancy rate was 53.2%. Those who underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy had the highest clinical pregnancy rate (67.5%). The mean live birth rate was 67.8% in our study. Twenty-one percent of pregnancies after fertility-sparing surgery required assisted reproductive technology. The mean cancer recurrence rate was 3.2%, and the cancer death rate was 0.6% after a median follow-up period of 40.1 months with no statistically significant difference across surgical approaches. Offering fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer is reasonable. Highest clinical pregnancy rate is associated with vaginal radical trachelectomy. Moreover oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive approaches were comparable with abdominal approaches. We encourage detailed preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approach to achieve best outcomes. Galenos Publishing 2022-12 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9743349/ /pubmed/36482657 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-9-7 Text en © Copyright 2022 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association published by Galenos Publishing House. |
spellingShingle | Review Nezhat, Farr Erfani, Hadi Nezhat, Camran A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer |
title | A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer |
title_full | A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer |
title_short | A systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer |
title_sort | systematic review of the reproductive and oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9743349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36482657 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-9-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nezhatfarr asystematicreviewofthereproductiveandoncologicoutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryforearlystagecervicalcancer AT erfanihadi asystematicreviewofthereproductiveandoncologicoutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryforearlystagecervicalcancer AT nezhatcamran asystematicreviewofthereproductiveandoncologicoutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryforearlystagecervicalcancer AT nezhatfarr systematicreviewofthereproductiveandoncologicoutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryforearlystagecervicalcancer AT erfanihadi systematicreviewofthereproductiveandoncologicoutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryforearlystagecervicalcancer AT nezhatcamran systematicreviewofthereproductiveandoncologicoutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryforearlystagecervicalcancer |