Cargando…

Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas are benign tumours for which various treatments are available. We performed a systematic review of prospective controlled trials comparing the patient-relevant benefits and harms of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sfSRS) with microsurgical resection (MR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakubeit, Thomas, Sturtz, Sibylle, Sow, Dorothea, Groß, Wolfram, Mosch, Christoph, Patt, Mattea, Weingärtner, Vera, Boström, Jan, Goldbrunner, Roland, Markes, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9743510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36503553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02118-9
_version_ 1784848738171224064
author Jakubeit, Thomas
Sturtz, Sibylle
Sow, Dorothea
Groß, Wolfram
Mosch, Christoph
Patt, Mattea
Weingärtner, Vera
Boström, Jan
Goldbrunner, Roland
Markes, Martina
author_facet Jakubeit, Thomas
Sturtz, Sibylle
Sow, Dorothea
Groß, Wolfram
Mosch, Christoph
Patt, Mattea
Weingärtner, Vera
Boström, Jan
Goldbrunner, Roland
Markes, Martina
author_sort Jakubeit, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas are benign tumours for which various treatments are available. We performed a systematic review of prospective controlled trials comparing the patient-relevant benefits and harms of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sfSRS) with microsurgical resection (MR) in patients with vestibular schwannoma. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective controlled trials in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and study registries (last search: 09/2021) and also screened reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Manufacturers were asked to provide unpublished data. Eligible studies investigated at least one patient-relevant outcome. We assessed the risk of bias (high or low) at the study and outcome level. If feasible, meta-analyses were performed. We graded the results into different categories (hint, indication, or proof of greater benefit or harm). RESULTS: We identified three non-randomized prospective controlled trials of generally low quality with evaluable data on 339 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. There was an indication of greater benefit of sfSRS compared with MR for facial palsy (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02–0.21, p < 0.001, 2 studies), hearing function (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies), and length of hospital stay (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies). We found no clinically relevant differences for mortality, vertigo, headaches, tinnitus, balance function, work disability, adverse events, and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review indicates that sfSRS has greater benefits than MR in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. However, it is unclear whether this conclusion still holds after 2 years, as long-term studies are lacking. It is also unclear whether the effects of sfSRS are similar in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Long-term prospective studies including patients with this condition would therefore be useful. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The full (German language) protocol and report (Commission No. N20-03) are available on the institute’s website: www.iqwig.de/en/projects/n20-03.html SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02118-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9743510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97435102022-12-13 Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Jakubeit, Thomas Sturtz, Sibylle Sow, Dorothea Groß, Wolfram Mosch, Christoph Patt, Mattea Weingärtner, Vera Boström, Jan Goldbrunner, Roland Markes, Martina Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas are benign tumours for which various treatments are available. We performed a systematic review of prospective controlled trials comparing the patient-relevant benefits and harms of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sfSRS) with microsurgical resection (MR) in patients with vestibular schwannoma. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective controlled trials in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and study registries (last search: 09/2021) and also screened reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Manufacturers were asked to provide unpublished data. Eligible studies investigated at least one patient-relevant outcome. We assessed the risk of bias (high or low) at the study and outcome level. If feasible, meta-analyses were performed. We graded the results into different categories (hint, indication, or proof of greater benefit or harm). RESULTS: We identified three non-randomized prospective controlled trials of generally low quality with evaluable data on 339 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. There was an indication of greater benefit of sfSRS compared with MR for facial palsy (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02–0.21, p < 0.001, 2 studies), hearing function (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies), and length of hospital stay (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies). We found no clinically relevant differences for mortality, vertigo, headaches, tinnitus, balance function, work disability, adverse events, and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review indicates that sfSRS has greater benefits than MR in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. However, it is unclear whether this conclusion still holds after 2 years, as long-term studies are lacking. It is also unclear whether the effects of sfSRS are similar in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Long-term prospective studies including patients with this condition would therefore be useful. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The full (German language) protocol and report (Commission No. N20-03) are available on the institute’s website: www.iqwig.de/en/projects/n20-03.html SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02118-9. BioMed Central 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9743510/ /pubmed/36503553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02118-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jakubeit, Thomas
Sturtz, Sibylle
Sow, Dorothea
Groß, Wolfram
Mosch, Christoph
Patt, Mattea
Weingärtner, Vera
Boström, Jan
Goldbrunner, Roland
Markes, Martina
Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery versus microsurgical resection for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9743510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36503553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02118-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jakubeitthomas singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sturtzsibylle singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sowdorothea singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT großwolfram singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moschchristoph singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pattmattea singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weingartnervera singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bostromjan singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goldbrunnerroland singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT markesmartina singlefractionstereotacticradiosurgeryversusmicrosurgicalresectionforthetreatmentofvestibularschwannomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis