Cargando…
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
PURPOSE: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100924 |
_version_ | 1784848865987395584 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Ting Martin Parikh, Neil R. Philipson, Rebecca G. van Dams, Ritchell Chang, Eric M. Hegde, John V. Kishan, Amar U. Kaprealian, Tania B. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. |
author_facet | Ma, Ting Martin Parikh, Neil R. Philipson, Rebecca G. van Dams, Ritchell Chang, Eric M. Hegde, John V. Kishan, Amar U. Kaprealian, Tania B. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. |
author_sort | Ma, Ting Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on-treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow-up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine will likely remain part of the radiation oncology workflow in most clinics after the pandemic. It should be used in conjunction with in-person visits, and may be best used for conducting follow-up visits in certain disease sites such as genitourinary and thoracic malignancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9744187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97441872022-12-13 Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 Ma, Ting Martin Parikh, Neil R. Philipson, Rebecca G. van Dams, Ritchell Chang, Eric M. Hegde, John V. Kishan, Amar U. Kaprealian, Tania B. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on-treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow-up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine will likely remain part of the radiation oncology workflow in most clinics after the pandemic. It should be used in conjunction with in-person visits, and may be best used for conducting follow-up visits in certain disease sites such as genitourinary and thoracic malignancies. Elsevier 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9744187/ /pubmed/36532603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100924 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Ma, Ting Martin Parikh, Neil R. Philipson, Rebecca G. van Dams, Ritchell Chang, Eric M. Hegde, John V. Kishan, Amar U. Kaprealian, Tania B. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 |
title | Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 |
title_full | Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 |
title_short | Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 |
title_sort | experience of telemedicine visits in radiation oncology during the covid-19 pandemic: a us national survey and lessons learned for incorporating telemedicine post-covid-19 |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matingmartin experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT parikhneilr experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT philipsonrebeccag experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT vandamsritchell experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT changericm experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT hegdejohnv experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT kishanamaru experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT kaprealiantaniab experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT steinbergmichaell experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 AT raldowannc experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19 |