Cargando…

Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19

PURPOSE: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Ting Martin, Parikh, Neil R., Philipson, Rebecca G., van Dams, Ritchell, Chang, Eric M., Hegde, John V., Kishan, Amar U., Kaprealian, Tania B., Steinberg, Michael L., Raldow, Ann C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100924
_version_ 1784848865987395584
author Ma, Ting Martin
Parikh, Neil R.
Philipson, Rebecca G.
van Dams, Ritchell
Chang, Eric M.
Hegde, John V.
Kishan, Amar U.
Kaprealian, Tania B.
Steinberg, Michael L.
Raldow, Ann C.
author_facet Ma, Ting Martin
Parikh, Neil R.
Philipson, Rebecca G.
van Dams, Ritchell
Chang, Eric M.
Hegde, John V.
Kishan, Amar U.
Kaprealian, Tania B.
Steinberg, Michael L.
Raldow, Ann C.
author_sort Ma, Ting Martin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on-treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow-up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine will likely remain part of the radiation oncology workflow in most clinics after the pandemic. It should be used in conjunction with in-person visits, and may be best used for conducting follow-up visits in certain disease sites such as genitourinary and thoracic malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9744187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97441872022-12-13 Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19 Ma, Ting Martin Parikh, Neil R. Philipson, Rebecca G. van Dams, Ritchell Chang, Eric M. Hegde, John V. Kishan, Amar U. Kaprealian, Tania B. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on-treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow-up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine will likely remain part of the radiation oncology workflow in most clinics after the pandemic. It should be used in conjunction with in-person visits, and may be best used for conducting follow-up visits in certain disease sites such as genitourinary and thoracic malignancies. Elsevier 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9744187/ /pubmed/36532603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100924 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Ma, Ting Martin
Parikh, Neil R.
Philipson, Rebecca G.
van Dams, Ritchell
Chang, Eric M.
Hegde, John V.
Kishan, Amar U.
Kaprealian, Tania B.
Steinberg, Michael L.
Raldow, Ann C.
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
title Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
title_full Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
title_fullStr Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
title_short Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
title_sort experience of telemedicine visits in radiation oncology during the covid-19 pandemic: a us national survey and lessons learned for incorporating telemedicine post-covid-19
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100924
work_keys_str_mv AT matingmartin experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT parikhneilr experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT philipsonrebeccag experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT vandamsritchell experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT changericm experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT hegdejohnv experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT kishanamaru experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT kaprealiantaniab experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT steinbergmichaell experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19
AT raldowannc experienceoftelemedicinevisitsinradiationoncologyduringthecovid19pandemicausnationalsurveyandlessonslearnedforincorporatingtelemedicinepostcovid19