Cargando…
Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) (i.e. genetic counseling prior to genetic testing) for women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Less than one-half of eligible women obtain CGRA, leaving thousands of women and their famil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623 |
_version_ | 1784848874079256576 |
---|---|
author | Le Compte, Circe Gray Lu, Shou-En Ani, Julianne McDougall, Jean Walters, Scott T. Toppmeyer, Deborah Boyce, Tawny W. Stroup, Antoinette Paddock, Lisa Grumet, Sherry Lin, Yong Heidt, Emily Kinney, Anita Y. |
author_facet | Le Compte, Circe Gray Lu, Shou-En Ani, Julianne McDougall, Jean Walters, Scott T. Toppmeyer, Deborah Boyce, Tawny W. Stroup, Antoinette Paddock, Lisa Grumet, Sherry Lin, Yong Heidt, Emily Kinney, Anita Y. |
author_sort | Le Compte, Circe Gray |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) (i.e. genetic counseling prior to genetic testing) for women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Less than one-half of eligible women obtain CGRA, leaving thousands of women and their family members without access to potentially life-saving cancer prevention interventions. PURPOSE: The Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment Project (GRACE) addressed this translational gap, testing the efficacy of a tailored counseling and navigation (TCN) intervention vs. a targeted print brochure vs. usual care on CGRA intentions. Selected behavioral variables were theorized to mediate CGRA intentions. METHODS: Breast and ovarian cancer survivors meeting criteria for guideline-based CGRA were recruited from three state cancer registries (N = 654), completed a baseline survey, and were randomized. TCN and targeted print arms received the brochure; TCN also participated in a tailored, telephone-based decision coaching and navigation session grounded in the Extended Parallel Process Model and Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Participants completed a one-month assessment. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of CGRA intentions. CGRA intentions and theorized mediator scores (continuous level variables) were calculated using mixed model analysis. RESULTS: CGRA intentions increased for TCN (53.2%) vs. targeted print (26.7%) (OR = 3.129; 95% CI: 2.028, 4.827, p < .0001) and TCN vs. usual care (23.1%) (OR = 3.778, CI: 2.422, 5.894, p < .0001). Perceived risk (p = 0.023) and self-efficacy (p = 0.035) mediated CGRA intentions in TCN. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in CGRA intentions and theorized mediators support the use of a tailored communication intervention among women at increased HBOC risk. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03326713.) Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03326713. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9744218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97442182022-12-13 Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial Le Compte, Circe Gray Lu, Shou-En Ani, Julianne McDougall, Jean Walters, Scott T. Toppmeyer, Deborah Boyce, Tawny W. Stroup, Antoinette Paddock, Lisa Grumet, Sherry Lin, Yong Heidt, Emily Kinney, Anita Y. Health Psychol Behav Med Research Article BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) (i.e. genetic counseling prior to genetic testing) for women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Less than one-half of eligible women obtain CGRA, leaving thousands of women and their family members without access to potentially life-saving cancer prevention interventions. PURPOSE: The Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment Project (GRACE) addressed this translational gap, testing the efficacy of a tailored counseling and navigation (TCN) intervention vs. a targeted print brochure vs. usual care on CGRA intentions. Selected behavioral variables were theorized to mediate CGRA intentions. METHODS: Breast and ovarian cancer survivors meeting criteria for guideline-based CGRA were recruited from three state cancer registries (N = 654), completed a baseline survey, and were randomized. TCN and targeted print arms received the brochure; TCN also participated in a tailored, telephone-based decision coaching and navigation session grounded in the Extended Parallel Process Model and Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Participants completed a one-month assessment. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of CGRA intentions. CGRA intentions and theorized mediator scores (continuous level variables) were calculated using mixed model analysis. RESULTS: CGRA intentions increased for TCN (53.2%) vs. targeted print (26.7%) (OR = 3.129; 95% CI: 2.028, 4.827, p < .0001) and TCN vs. usual care (23.1%) (OR = 3.778, CI: 2.422, 5.894, p < .0001). Perceived risk (p = 0.023) and self-efficacy (p = 0.035) mediated CGRA intentions in TCN. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in CGRA intentions and theorized mediators support the use of a tailored communication intervention among women at increased HBOC risk. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03326713.) Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03326713. Routledge 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9744218/ /pubmed/36518606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Le Compte, Circe Gray Lu, Shou-En Ani, Julianne McDougall, Jean Walters, Scott T. Toppmeyer, Deborah Boyce, Tawny W. Stroup, Antoinette Paddock, Lisa Grumet, Sherry Lin, Yong Heidt, Emily Kinney, Anita Y. Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial |
title | Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecomptecircegray understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lushouen understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT anijulianne understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcdougalljean understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT waltersscottt understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT toppmeyerdeborah understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT boycetawnyw understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stroupantoinette understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paddocklisa understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grumetsherry understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linyong understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT heidtemily understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kinneyanitay understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial |