Cargando…

Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) (i.e. genetic counseling prior to genetic testing) for women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Less than one-half of eligible women obtain CGRA, leaving thousands of women and their famil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Compte, Circe Gray, Lu, Shou-En, Ani, Julianne, McDougall, Jean, Walters, Scott T., Toppmeyer, Deborah, Boyce, Tawny W., Stroup, Antoinette, Paddock, Lisa, Grumet, Sherry, Lin, Yong, Heidt, Emily, Kinney, Anita Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623
_version_ 1784848874079256576
author Le Compte, Circe Gray
Lu, Shou-En
Ani, Julianne
McDougall, Jean
Walters, Scott T.
Toppmeyer, Deborah
Boyce, Tawny W.
Stroup, Antoinette
Paddock, Lisa
Grumet, Sherry
Lin, Yong
Heidt, Emily
Kinney, Anita Y.
author_facet Le Compte, Circe Gray
Lu, Shou-En
Ani, Julianne
McDougall, Jean
Walters, Scott T.
Toppmeyer, Deborah
Boyce, Tawny W.
Stroup, Antoinette
Paddock, Lisa
Grumet, Sherry
Lin, Yong
Heidt, Emily
Kinney, Anita Y.
author_sort Le Compte, Circe Gray
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) (i.e. genetic counseling prior to genetic testing) for women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Less than one-half of eligible women obtain CGRA, leaving thousands of women and their family members without access to potentially life-saving cancer prevention interventions. PURPOSE: The Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment Project (GRACE) addressed this translational gap, testing the efficacy of a tailored counseling and navigation (TCN) intervention vs. a targeted print brochure vs. usual care on CGRA intentions. Selected behavioral variables were theorized to mediate CGRA intentions. METHODS: Breast and ovarian cancer survivors meeting criteria for guideline-based CGRA were recruited from three state cancer registries (N = 654), completed a baseline survey, and were randomized. TCN and targeted print arms received the brochure; TCN also participated in a tailored, telephone-based decision coaching and navigation session grounded in the Extended Parallel Process Model and Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Participants completed a one-month assessment. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of CGRA intentions. CGRA intentions and theorized mediator scores (continuous level variables) were calculated using mixed model analysis. RESULTS: CGRA intentions increased for TCN (53.2%) vs. targeted print (26.7%) (OR = 3.129; 95% CI: 2.028, 4.827, p < .0001) and TCN vs. usual care (23.1%) (OR = 3.778, CI: 2.422, 5.894, p < .0001). Perceived risk (p = 0.023) and self-efficacy (p = 0.035) mediated CGRA intentions in TCN. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in CGRA intentions and theorized mediators support the use of a tailored communication intervention among women at increased HBOC risk. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03326713.) Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03326713.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9744218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97442182022-12-13 Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial Le Compte, Circe Gray Lu, Shou-En Ani, Julianne McDougall, Jean Walters, Scott T. Toppmeyer, Deborah Boyce, Tawny W. Stroup, Antoinette Paddock, Lisa Grumet, Sherry Lin, Yong Heidt, Emily Kinney, Anita Y. Health Psychol Behav Med Research Article BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) (i.e. genetic counseling prior to genetic testing) for women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Less than one-half of eligible women obtain CGRA, leaving thousands of women and their family members without access to potentially life-saving cancer prevention interventions. PURPOSE: The Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment Project (GRACE) addressed this translational gap, testing the efficacy of a tailored counseling and navigation (TCN) intervention vs. a targeted print brochure vs. usual care on CGRA intentions. Selected behavioral variables were theorized to mediate CGRA intentions. METHODS: Breast and ovarian cancer survivors meeting criteria for guideline-based CGRA were recruited from three state cancer registries (N = 654), completed a baseline survey, and were randomized. TCN and targeted print arms received the brochure; TCN also participated in a tailored, telephone-based decision coaching and navigation session grounded in the Extended Parallel Process Model and Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Participants completed a one-month assessment. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of CGRA intentions. CGRA intentions and theorized mediator scores (continuous level variables) were calculated using mixed model analysis. RESULTS: CGRA intentions increased for TCN (53.2%) vs. targeted print (26.7%) (OR = 3.129; 95% CI: 2.028, 4.827, p < .0001) and TCN vs. usual care (23.1%) (OR = 3.778, CI: 2.422, 5.894, p < .0001). Perceived risk (p = 0.023) and self-efficacy (p = 0.035) mediated CGRA intentions in TCN. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in CGRA intentions and theorized mediators support the use of a tailored communication intervention among women at increased HBOC risk. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03326713.) Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03326713. Routledge 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9744218/ /pubmed/36518606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le Compte, Circe Gray
Lu, Shou-En
Ani, Julianne
McDougall, Jean
Walters, Scott T.
Toppmeyer, Deborah
Boyce, Tawny W.
Stroup, Antoinette
Paddock, Lisa
Grumet, Sherry
Lin, Yong
Heidt, Emily
Kinney, Anita Y.
Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
title Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
title_full Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
title_short Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
title_sort understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623
work_keys_str_mv AT lecomptecircegray understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lushouen understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT anijulianne understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcdougalljean understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT waltersscottt understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT toppmeyerdeborah understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boycetawnyw understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stroupantoinette understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paddocklisa understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grumetsherry understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linyong understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heidtemily understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kinneyanitay understandingcancergeneticriskassessmentmotivationsinaremotetailoredriskcommunicationandnavigationinterventionrandomizedcontrolledtrial