Cargando…
Author-suggested reviewers rate manuscripts much more favorably: A cross-sectional analysis of the neuroscience section of PLOS ONE
Peer review is an important part of science, aimed at providing expert and objective assessment of a manuscript. Because of many factors, including time constraints, unique expertise needs, and deference, many journals ask authors to suggest peer reviewers for their own manuscript. Previous research...
Autores principales: | Acuna, Daniel E., Teplitskiy, Misha, Evans, James A., Kording, Konrad |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273994 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Introducing the PLOS ONE Collection on the neuroscience of reward and decision making
por: Groman, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The PLOS Computational Biology Software Section
por: Prlić, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Why Provide an Opinions Section in PLoS Pathogens?
por: Manchester, Marianne
Publicado: (2005) -
New Methods Section in PLOS Computational Biology
por: Lengauer, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The Development and Analysis of Integrated Neuroscience Data
por: Glaser, Joshua I., et al.
Publicado: (2016)