Cargando…

Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a simple, safe, and effective treatment for contained cervical herniated intervertebral disc (CHIVD). However, few studies have compared the actual benefits of PCN against conservative treatment (CT), either clinically or radiographically. PURP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chien-Hua, Chiu, You-Pen, Ji, Hui-Ru, Wu, Chin-Ying, Guo, Jeng-Hung, Jaw, Fu-Shan, Chiu, Cheng-Di
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278883
_version_ 1784848898284584960
author Chen, Chien-Hua
Chiu, You-Pen
Ji, Hui-Ru
Wu, Chin-Ying
Guo, Jeng-Hung
Jaw, Fu-Shan
Chiu, Cheng-Di
author_facet Chen, Chien-Hua
Chiu, You-Pen
Ji, Hui-Ru
Wu, Chin-Ying
Guo, Jeng-Hung
Jaw, Fu-Shan
Chiu, Cheng-Di
author_sort Chen, Chien-Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a simple, safe, and effective treatment for contained cervical herniated intervertebral disc (CHIVD). However, few studies have compared the actual benefits of PCN against conservative treatment (CT), either clinically or radiographically. PURPOSE: The present study sought to analyze and to compare the outcomes of symptomatic contained CHIVD treated with PCN or CT. METHODS: The present study was designed as a case–control comparative study. Patients who indicated for PCN after a failed CT for more than 6 months were recruited. After the exclusion of some patients who did not meet the selection criteria of the study, we finally enrolled 71 patients treated with PCN. In addition, another 21 patients who indicated for PCN but finally chose to receive CT continuously were also enrolled and categorized as the control group. All patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Pain levels and functional outcomes were evaluated pre- and post-operatively by assessing the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiographic images of 72 of 104 intervened segments were collected to measure disc height and other cervical spinal alignments, such as range of motion, C2–7 Cobb’s angle, and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis. RESULTS: Compared with the CT group, the PCN group showed significantly better outcomes on VAS, ODI, and NDI at the 1-month post-operative follow-up, which continued through at least the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.01 for VAS and P < 0.05 for ODI and NDI). The mean disc height significantly decreased, from 6.04 ± 0.85 mm to 5.76 ± 1.02 mm, 3 months after PCN treatment (P = 0.003). However, the degree of disc height decrease did not correlate with the changes of the substantial VAS improvement. CONCLUSIONS: To provide therapeutic benefits for symptomatic contained CHIVD patients after an invalid CT for 6 months, PCN seems to be a better option than CT. The reduced disc heights did not alter the clinical outcomes of PCN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9744319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97443192022-12-13 Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study Chen, Chien-Hua Chiu, You-Pen Ji, Hui-Ru Wu, Chin-Ying Guo, Jeng-Hung Jaw, Fu-Shan Chiu, Cheng-Di PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a simple, safe, and effective treatment for contained cervical herniated intervertebral disc (CHIVD). However, few studies have compared the actual benefits of PCN against conservative treatment (CT), either clinically or radiographically. PURPOSE: The present study sought to analyze and to compare the outcomes of symptomatic contained CHIVD treated with PCN or CT. METHODS: The present study was designed as a case–control comparative study. Patients who indicated for PCN after a failed CT for more than 6 months were recruited. After the exclusion of some patients who did not meet the selection criteria of the study, we finally enrolled 71 patients treated with PCN. In addition, another 21 patients who indicated for PCN but finally chose to receive CT continuously were also enrolled and categorized as the control group. All patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Pain levels and functional outcomes were evaluated pre- and post-operatively by assessing the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiographic images of 72 of 104 intervened segments were collected to measure disc height and other cervical spinal alignments, such as range of motion, C2–7 Cobb’s angle, and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis. RESULTS: Compared with the CT group, the PCN group showed significantly better outcomes on VAS, ODI, and NDI at the 1-month post-operative follow-up, which continued through at least the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.01 for VAS and P < 0.05 for ODI and NDI). The mean disc height significantly decreased, from 6.04 ± 0.85 mm to 5.76 ± 1.02 mm, 3 months after PCN treatment (P = 0.003). However, the degree of disc height decrease did not correlate with the changes of the substantial VAS improvement. CONCLUSIONS: To provide therapeutic benefits for symptomatic contained CHIVD patients after an invalid CT for 6 months, PCN seems to be a better option than CT. The reduced disc heights did not alter the clinical outcomes of PCN. Public Library of Science 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9744319/ /pubmed/36508407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278883 Text en © 2022 Chen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Chien-Hua
Chiu, You-Pen
Ji, Hui-Ru
Wu, Chin-Ying
Guo, Jeng-Hung
Jaw, Fu-Shan
Chiu, Cheng-Di
Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study
title Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study
title_full Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study
title_fullStr Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study
title_short Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case–control study
title_sort analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: a case–control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278883
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchienhua analysisoftheclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyacasecontrolstudy
AT chiuyoupen analysisoftheclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyacasecontrolstudy
AT jihuiru analysisoftheclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyacasecontrolstudy
AT wuchinying analysisoftheclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyacasecontrolstudy
AT guojenghung analysisoftheclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyacasecontrolstudy
AT jawfushan analysisoftheclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyacasecontrolstudy
AT chiuchengdi analysisoftheclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyacasecontrolstudy