Cargando…

Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients

OBJECTIVE: To identify magnetic resonance imaging findings of the prostate in young adults, including symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the main aspects of prostate imaging in young patients. METHODS: A total of 102 patients under 40 years of age, who underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suguino, Renan Kinoshita, Mussi, Thaís Caldara, Coelho, Fernando Morbeck Almeida, Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477522
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO0024
_version_ 1784848924160294912
author Suguino, Renan Kinoshita
Mussi, Thaís Caldara
Coelho, Fernando Morbeck Almeida
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
author_facet Suguino, Renan Kinoshita
Mussi, Thaís Caldara
Coelho, Fernando Morbeck Almeida
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
author_sort Suguino, Renan Kinoshita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify magnetic resonance imaging findings of the prostate in young adults, including symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the main aspects of prostate imaging in young patients. METHODS: A total of 102 patients under 40 years of age, who underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging between January 2016 and January 2019, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic for prostatitis (Group 1) and asymptomatic (Group 2). Magnetic resonance imaging scans were anonymized and interpreted by a radiologist blinded for clinical information. The study evaluated peripheral zone signal in T2-weighted sequences, diffusion and apparent diffusion coefficient map; peripheral zone enhancement pattern; seminal vesicles and periprostatic fat. RESULTS: All evaluated criteria did not present statistically significant differences between the two groups. The most common pattern was heterogeneous hyposignal on T2 (57.9% in Group 1 and 57.8% in Group 2; p=0.506), mild diffuse / wedge-shaped areas of hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficient map (61.4% in Group 1 and 64.4% in Group 2; p=0.931) and early post-contrast enhancement (73.7% in Group 1 and 68.9% in Group 2, p=0719). CONCLUSION: The magnetic resonance imaging aspect of young patients showed no differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9744424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97444242022-12-16 Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients Suguino, Renan Kinoshita Mussi, Thaís Caldara Coelho, Fernando Morbeck Almeida Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To identify magnetic resonance imaging findings of the prostate in young adults, including symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the main aspects of prostate imaging in young patients. METHODS: A total of 102 patients under 40 years of age, who underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging between January 2016 and January 2019, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic for prostatitis (Group 1) and asymptomatic (Group 2). Magnetic resonance imaging scans were anonymized and interpreted by a radiologist blinded for clinical information. The study evaluated peripheral zone signal in T2-weighted sequences, diffusion and apparent diffusion coefficient map; peripheral zone enhancement pattern; seminal vesicles and periprostatic fat. RESULTS: All evaluated criteria did not present statistically significant differences between the two groups. The most common pattern was heterogeneous hyposignal on T2 (57.9% in Group 1 and 57.8% in Group 2; p=0.506), mild diffuse / wedge-shaped areas of hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficient map (61.4% in Group 1 and 64.4% in Group 2; p=0.931) and early post-contrast enhancement (73.7% in Group 1 and 68.9% in Group 2, p=0719). CONCLUSION: The magnetic resonance imaging aspect of young patients showed no differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9744424/ /pubmed/36477522 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO0024 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Suguino, Renan Kinoshita
Mussi, Thaís Caldara
Coelho, Fernando Morbeck Almeida
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients
title Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients
title_full Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients
title_fullStr Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients
title_full_unstemmed Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients
title_short Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients
title_sort prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477522
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO0024
work_keys_str_mv AT suguinorenankinoshita prostateimagingfeaturesonmagneticresonanceimagingofyoungpatients
AT mussithaiscaldara prostateimagingfeaturesonmagneticresonanceimagingofyoungpatients
AT coelhofernandomorbeckalmeida prostateimagingfeaturesonmagneticresonanceimagingofyoungpatients
AT baronironaldohueb prostateimagingfeaturesonmagneticresonanceimagingofyoungpatients