Cargando…

Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality

BACKGROUND: Artifacts from surrounding bony structures, especially from the petrous bones, regularly impair soft tissue computed tomography (CT) imaging of the middle and posterior fossa. This affects flat-panel CT in particular. Sinusoidal movement of the C‑arm during acquisition (i.e. craniocaudal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luecking, Hannes, Hoelter, Philip, Lang, Stefan, Schmidt, Manuel, Eisenhut, Felix, Doerfler, Arnd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01172-z
_version_ 1784848979420250112
author Luecking, Hannes
Hoelter, Philip
Lang, Stefan
Schmidt, Manuel
Eisenhut, Felix
Doerfler, Arnd
author_facet Luecking, Hannes
Hoelter, Philip
Lang, Stefan
Schmidt, Manuel
Eisenhut, Felix
Doerfler, Arnd
author_sort Luecking, Hannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artifacts from surrounding bony structures, especially from the petrous bones, regularly impair soft tissue computed tomography (CT) imaging of the middle and posterior fossa. This affects flat-panel CT in particular. Sinusoidal movement of the C‑arm during acquisition (i.e. craniocaudal tilting along with semicircular rotation) is supposed to reduce artifacts, thus enhancing soft tissue imaging quality. METHODS: In the work-up of ischemic stroke or subarachnoid hemorrhage 40 patients underwent multi-slice CT (MS-CT) and either plain circular (cFP-CT; n = 20) or sinusoidal (sFP-CT; n = 20) flat-panel CT within a short interval. Two independent readers analyzed MS-CT and FP-CT datasets for recognizability of eight different brain structures and three typical types of artifacts according to a predetermined score. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was moderate for cFP-CT (κ = 0.575) and good to very good for ratings of MS-CT and sFP-CT (κ = 0.651 to κ = 1). MS-CT was rated to be significantly better than cFP-CT and sFP-CT (p < 0.0001) in the overall score. Yet, sFP-CT was rated to be significantly superior to cFP-CT (overall p < 0.0001) regarding most anatomical regions and petrous bone artifacts. CONCLUSION: Compared to a standard circular protocol, sinusoidal C‑arm movement in cranial FP-CT can significantly reduce artifacts in the posterior fossa and, moreover, can improve visualization of most supratentorial and infratentorial anatomical structures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-022-01172-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9744702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97447022022-12-14 Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality Luecking, Hannes Hoelter, Philip Lang, Stefan Schmidt, Manuel Eisenhut, Felix Doerfler, Arnd Clin Neuroradiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Artifacts from surrounding bony structures, especially from the petrous bones, regularly impair soft tissue computed tomography (CT) imaging of the middle and posterior fossa. This affects flat-panel CT in particular. Sinusoidal movement of the C‑arm during acquisition (i.e. craniocaudal tilting along with semicircular rotation) is supposed to reduce artifacts, thus enhancing soft tissue imaging quality. METHODS: In the work-up of ischemic stroke or subarachnoid hemorrhage 40 patients underwent multi-slice CT (MS-CT) and either plain circular (cFP-CT; n = 20) or sinusoidal (sFP-CT; n = 20) flat-panel CT within a short interval. Two independent readers analyzed MS-CT and FP-CT datasets for recognizability of eight different brain structures and three typical types of artifacts according to a predetermined score. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was moderate for cFP-CT (κ = 0.575) and good to very good for ratings of MS-CT and sFP-CT (κ = 0.651 to κ = 1). MS-CT was rated to be significantly better than cFP-CT and sFP-CT (p < 0.0001) in the overall score. Yet, sFP-CT was rated to be significantly superior to cFP-CT (overall p < 0.0001) regarding most anatomical regions and petrous bone artifacts. CONCLUSION: Compared to a standard circular protocol, sinusoidal C‑arm movement in cranial FP-CT can significantly reduce artifacts in the posterior fossa and, moreover, can improve visualization of most supratentorial and infratentorial anatomical structures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-022-01172-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9744702/ /pubmed/35513553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01172-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Luecking, Hannes
Hoelter, Philip
Lang, Stefan
Schmidt, Manuel
Eisenhut, Felix
Doerfler, Arnd
Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality
title Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality
title_full Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality
title_fullStr Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality
title_full_unstemmed Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality
title_short Change your Angle of View: Sinusoidal C-Arm Movement in Cranial Flat-panel CT to Improve Image Quality
title_sort change your angle of view: sinusoidal c-arm movement in cranial flat-panel ct to improve image quality
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01172-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lueckinghannes changeyourangleofviewsinusoidalcarmmovementincranialflatpanelcttoimproveimagequality
AT hoelterphilip changeyourangleofviewsinusoidalcarmmovementincranialflatpanelcttoimproveimagequality
AT langstefan changeyourangleofviewsinusoidalcarmmovementincranialflatpanelcttoimproveimagequality
AT schmidtmanuel changeyourangleofviewsinusoidalcarmmovementincranialflatpanelcttoimproveimagequality
AT eisenhutfelix changeyourangleofviewsinusoidalcarmmovementincranialflatpanelcttoimproveimagequality
AT doerflerarnd changeyourangleofviewsinusoidalcarmmovementincranialflatpanelcttoimproveimagequality