Cargando…
Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population
To analyze the morphology of paired fibula and mandible aiming to choose optimal fibular segments for mandibular reconstruction in a Chinses population. A total of 118 cases of paired mandible and fibula was collected. All patients were received preoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) scans for mandibular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36509968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26033-0 |
_version_ | 1784849010878578688 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Xiaojie Wang, Zhuo Wan, Jinbo Xu, Jiamin Wang, Haoran Bian, Yifeng Wan, Linzhong Du, Yifei Wang, Yuli Yuan, Hua |
author_facet | Ma, Xiaojie Wang, Zhuo Wan, Jinbo Xu, Jiamin Wang, Haoran Bian, Yifeng Wan, Linzhong Du, Yifei Wang, Yuli Yuan, Hua |
author_sort | Ma, Xiaojie |
collection | PubMed |
description | To analyze the morphology of paired fibula and mandible aiming to choose optimal fibular segments for mandibular reconstruction in a Chinses population. A total of 118 cases of paired mandible and fibula was collected. All patients were received preoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) scans for mandibular evaluation and CT-angiographical (CTA) examination of the bilateral lower legs, respectively. The cross-sectional morphological differences between proximal (Side P), middle (Side M) and distal (Side D) segments of fibula and anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible were compared. The most frequent cross-sectional shape at Side D, Side M and Side P portion of fibula was circular (75.4%), triangular (67.8%) and circular (49.2%), respectively. In anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible, the most of the cross-section was s-shape (90.82%), straight (83.64%) and oblique (91.89%), respectively. The height and width of upper one third (W1) at Side M were significantly larger than those of Side D and Side P (p < 0.0001). There was significantly difference of width of lower one third (W2) among three groups (p < 0.0001). As for the height and widths of mandible, there was significant difference among anterior, premolar and molar regions (p < 0.0001). The rate of height between Side M of fibula and mandible (H (Side M/area)) was significantly larger than H (Side D/area) and H (Side P/area) (p < 0.01). The ratio of W1 between Side D of fibula and mandible (W1 (Side D/area)) was significantly larger than that of W1 (Side M/area) and W1 (side P/area) (p < 0.05). As for the ratio of W2 between fibula and mandible (W2 (plane/area)), there was significant difference among groups (p < 0.01). The distal and middle segments of fibula were suitable for reconstructing the anterior area of mandible and the proximal segment of fibula was more compatible with the premolar and molar areas of mandible. Clinical Relevance Presurgical morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible aids for optimal fibular-based mandibular reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9744824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97448242022-12-14 Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population Ma, Xiaojie Wang, Zhuo Wan, Jinbo Xu, Jiamin Wang, Haoran Bian, Yifeng Wan, Linzhong Du, Yifei Wang, Yuli Yuan, Hua Sci Rep Article To analyze the morphology of paired fibula and mandible aiming to choose optimal fibular segments for mandibular reconstruction in a Chinses population. A total of 118 cases of paired mandible and fibula was collected. All patients were received preoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) scans for mandibular evaluation and CT-angiographical (CTA) examination of the bilateral lower legs, respectively. The cross-sectional morphological differences between proximal (Side P), middle (Side M) and distal (Side D) segments of fibula and anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible were compared. The most frequent cross-sectional shape at Side D, Side M and Side P portion of fibula was circular (75.4%), triangular (67.8%) and circular (49.2%), respectively. In anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible, the most of the cross-section was s-shape (90.82%), straight (83.64%) and oblique (91.89%), respectively. The height and width of upper one third (W1) at Side M were significantly larger than those of Side D and Side P (p < 0.0001). There was significantly difference of width of lower one third (W2) among three groups (p < 0.0001). As for the height and widths of mandible, there was significant difference among anterior, premolar and molar regions (p < 0.0001). The rate of height between Side M of fibula and mandible (H (Side M/area)) was significantly larger than H (Side D/area) and H (Side P/area) (p < 0.01). The ratio of W1 between Side D of fibula and mandible (W1 (Side D/area)) was significantly larger than that of W1 (Side M/area) and W1 (side P/area) (p < 0.05). As for the ratio of W2 between fibula and mandible (W2 (plane/area)), there was significant difference among groups (p < 0.01). The distal and middle segments of fibula were suitable for reconstructing the anterior area of mandible and the proximal segment of fibula was more compatible with the premolar and molar areas of mandible. Clinical Relevance Presurgical morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible aids for optimal fibular-based mandibular reconstruction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9744824/ /pubmed/36509968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26033-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ma, Xiaojie Wang, Zhuo Wan, Jinbo Xu, Jiamin Wang, Haoran Bian, Yifeng Wan, Linzhong Du, Yifei Wang, Yuli Yuan, Hua Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population |
title | Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population |
title_full | Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population |
title_fullStr | Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population |
title_short | Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population |
title_sort | morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a chinese population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36509968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26033-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maxiaojie morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT wangzhuo morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT wanjinbo morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT xujiamin morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT wanghaoran morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT bianyifeng morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT wanlinzhong morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT duyifei morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT wangyuli morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation AT yuanhua morphometricanalysisofpairedfibulaandmandibleforoptimalfibularmandibularreconstructioninachinesepopulation |