Cargando…

Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context

Evidence shows that participants performing a continuous visual categorization task respond slower following the presentation of a task-irrelevant sound deviating from an otherwise repetitive or predictable auditory context (deviant sound among standard sounds). Here, for the first time, we explored...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parmentier, Fabrice B. R., Gallego, Laura, Micucci, Antonia, Leiva, Alicia, Andrés, Pilar, Maybery, Murray T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36509791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25500-y
_version_ 1784849029027332096
author Parmentier, Fabrice B. R.
Gallego, Laura
Micucci, Antonia
Leiva, Alicia
Andrés, Pilar
Maybery, Murray T.
author_facet Parmentier, Fabrice B. R.
Gallego, Laura
Micucci, Antonia
Leiva, Alicia
Andrés, Pilar
Maybery, Murray T.
author_sort Parmentier, Fabrice B. R.
collection PubMed
description Evidence shows that participants performing a continuous visual categorization task respond slower following the presentation of a task-irrelevant sound deviating from an otherwise repetitive or predictable auditory context (deviant sound among standard sounds). Here, for the first time, we explored the role of the environmental context (instrumentalized as a task-irrelevant background picture) in this effect. In two experiments, participants categorized left/right arrows while ignoring irrelevant sounds and background pictures of forest and city scenes. While equiprobable across the task, sounds A and B were presented with probabilities of .882 and .118 in the forest context, respectively, and with the reversed probabilities in the city context. Hence, neither sound constituted a deviant sound at task-level, but each did within a specific context. In Experiment 1, where each environmental context (forest and city scene) consisted of a single picture each, participants were significantly slower in the visual task following the presentation of the sound that was unexpected within the current context (context-dependent distraction). Further analysis showed that the cognitive system reset its sensory predictions even for the first trial of a change in environmental context. In Experiment 2, the two contexts (forest and city) were implemented using sets of 32 pictures each, with the background picture changing on every trial. Here too, context-dependent deviance distraction was observed. However, participants took a trial to fully reset their sensory predictions upon a change in context. We conclude that irrelevant sounds are incidentally processed in association with the environmental context (even though these stimuli belong to different sensory modalities) and that sensory predictions are context-dependent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9744899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97448992022-12-14 Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context Parmentier, Fabrice B. R. Gallego, Laura Micucci, Antonia Leiva, Alicia Andrés, Pilar Maybery, Murray T. Sci Rep Article Evidence shows that participants performing a continuous visual categorization task respond slower following the presentation of a task-irrelevant sound deviating from an otherwise repetitive or predictable auditory context (deviant sound among standard sounds). Here, for the first time, we explored the role of the environmental context (instrumentalized as a task-irrelevant background picture) in this effect. In two experiments, participants categorized left/right arrows while ignoring irrelevant sounds and background pictures of forest and city scenes. While equiprobable across the task, sounds A and B were presented with probabilities of .882 and .118 in the forest context, respectively, and with the reversed probabilities in the city context. Hence, neither sound constituted a deviant sound at task-level, but each did within a specific context. In Experiment 1, where each environmental context (forest and city scene) consisted of a single picture each, participants were significantly slower in the visual task following the presentation of the sound that was unexpected within the current context (context-dependent distraction). Further analysis showed that the cognitive system reset its sensory predictions even for the first trial of a change in environmental context. In Experiment 2, the two contexts (forest and city) were implemented using sets of 32 pictures each, with the background picture changing on every trial. Here too, context-dependent deviance distraction was observed. However, participants took a trial to fully reset their sensory predictions upon a change in context. We conclude that irrelevant sounds are incidentally processed in association with the environmental context (even though these stimuli belong to different sensory modalities) and that sensory predictions are context-dependent. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9744899/ /pubmed/36509791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25500-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Parmentier, Fabrice B. R.
Gallego, Laura
Micucci, Antonia
Leiva, Alicia
Andrés, Pilar
Maybery, Murray T.
Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context
title Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context
title_full Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context
title_fullStr Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context
title_full_unstemmed Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context
title_short Distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context
title_sort distraction by deviant sounds is modulated by the environmental context
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9744899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36509791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25500-y
work_keys_str_mv AT parmentierfabricebr distractionbydeviantsoundsismodulatedbytheenvironmentalcontext
AT gallegolaura distractionbydeviantsoundsismodulatedbytheenvironmentalcontext
AT micucciantonia distractionbydeviantsoundsismodulatedbytheenvironmentalcontext
AT leivaalicia distractionbydeviantsoundsismodulatedbytheenvironmentalcontext
AT andrespilar distractionbydeviantsoundsismodulatedbytheenvironmentalcontext
AT mayberymurrayt distractionbydeviantsoundsismodulatedbytheenvironmentalcontext