Cargando…

The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software

Digital Health Solutions (DHS) approved under the Medical Device Directive (MDD) in the European Union may be used until May 27, 2025. The regulation provides appropriate requirements for the products but lack the evaluation by an external independent organization. For many DHS, the company can make...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kyhlstedt, Mattias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523427
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1063622
_version_ 1784849048701763584
author Kyhlstedt, Mattias
author_facet Kyhlstedt, Mattias
author_sort Kyhlstedt, Mattias
collection PubMed
description Digital Health Solutions (DHS) approved under the Medical Device Directive (MDD) in the European Union may be used until May 27, 2025. The regulation provides appropriate requirements for the products but lack the evaluation by an external independent organization. For many DHS, the company can make a self-certification that the requirements have been fulfilled. As demonstrated in the evaluation of smartphone-based apps for skin cancer risk assessment such products may expose the public to undue risks. The new Medical Device Regulation provides adequate control of DHS through evaluation of independent organization prior to allowing the product on the market. HTA-evaluators and those who make decisions regarding the use of DHS need to understand the associated risks with the use of products approved according to the MDD and ensure appropriate risk mitigations to ensure that the public is not exposed to undue risk. This perspective aims to inform decisionmakers about the risks associated with the delayed requirement to transition to the new MDR regulation. There is a gap in the current guidance regarding the evolving use of machine learning and artificial intelligence. With the evolving use of DHS, it is important that industry, regulators and HTA evaluators work jointly to establish the safe and effective use of DHS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9745019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97450192022-12-14 The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software Kyhlstedt, Mattias Front Med Technol Medical Technology Digital Health Solutions (DHS) approved under the Medical Device Directive (MDD) in the European Union may be used until May 27, 2025. The regulation provides appropriate requirements for the products but lack the evaluation by an external independent organization. For many DHS, the company can make a self-certification that the requirements have been fulfilled. As demonstrated in the evaluation of smartphone-based apps for skin cancer risk assessment such products may expose the public to undue risks. The new Medical Device Regulation provides adequate control of DHS through evaluation of independent organization prior to allowing the product on the market. HTA-evaluators and those who make decisions regarding the use of DHS need to understand the associated risks with the use of products approved according to the MDD and ensure appropriate risk mitigations to ensure that the public is not exposed to undue risk. This perspective aims to inform decisionmakers about the risks associated with the delayed requirement to transition to the new MDR regulation. There is a gap in the current guidance regarding the evolving use of machine learning and artificial intelligence. With the evolving use of DHS, it is important that industry, regulators and HTA evaluators work jointly to establish the safe and effective use of DHS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9745019/ /pubmed/36523427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1063622 Text en © 2022 Kyhlstedt. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medical Technology
Kyhlstedt, Mattias
The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software
title The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software
title_full The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software
title_fullStr The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software
title_full_unstemmed The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software
title_short The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software
title_sort need for action by evaluators and decision makers in europe to ensure safe use of medical software
topic Medical Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523427
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1063622
work_keys_str_mv AT kyhlstedtmattias theneedforactionbyevaluatorsanddecisionmakersineuropetoensuresafeuseofmedicalsoftware
AT kyhlstedtmattias needforactionbyevaluatorsanddecisionmakersineuropetoensuresafeuseofmedicalsoftware