Cargando…

Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact

BACKGROUND: Helical tomotherapy (HT), a unique rotational dose delivery machine, has been updated from Hi-ART to Radixact. We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using HT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compared the dosimetric details of H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Sun Hyun, Cho, Kwang Hwan, Jung, Jae Hong, Kim, Young Seok, Kim, Sang Gyune, Yoo, Jeong-Ju, Lee, Jae Myung, Lee, Min Hee, Lim, Sung Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523318
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-1565
_version_ 1784849140303265792
author Bae, Sun Hyun
Cho, Kwang Hwan
Jung, Jae Hong
Kim, Young Seok
Kim, Sang Gyune
Yoo, Jeong-Ju
Lee, Jae Myung
Lee, Min Hee
Jung, Jae Hong
Lim, Sung Hee
author_facet Bae, Sun Hyun
Cho, Kwang Hwan
Jung, Jae Hong
Kim, Young Seok
Kim, Sang Gyune
Yoo, Jeong-Ju
Lee, Jae Myung
Lee, Min Hee
Jung, Jae Hong
Lim, Sung Hee
author_sort Bae, Sun Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Helical tomotherapy (HT), a unique rotational dose delivery machine, has been updated from Hi-ART to Radixact. We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using HT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compared the dosimetric details of Hi-ART and Radixact. METHODS: Between April 2014 and November 2020, 28 patients with HCC were treated with SBRT using HT for a cure at Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, 9 patients had stage 0 disease, 12 had stage A, 4 had stage B, and 3 had stage C. The tumor size ranged from 1 cm to 8 cm (median, 2 cm). The SBRT dose ranged from 40 to 60 Gy (median, 48 Gy) with 4 fractions. Twenty-three patients were treated with Hi-ART and 5 patients were treated with Radixact. To compare the dosimetric parameters between Hi-ART and Radixact, we created treatment plans with the same constraints, pitch, modulation factor, and field width for the same patient in pairs. RESULTS: The median follow-up time from the date of SBRT administration was 24 months (range, 3–67 months). The local failure-free survival and intrahepatic failure-free survival rates were 96% and 58% at 1 year, 84% and 36% at 2 years, and 76% and 18% at 3 years, respectively. The overall survival rate was 93% at 1 year, 93% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years, respectively. When the paired treatment plans were reviewed, the beam-on time and intermediate dose-spillage were found to be significantly reduced in Radixact than Hi-ART (P<0.001). With regard to normal organ sparing, the irradiated dose to the total liver, normal liver, heart, and kidney was significantly lower with Radixact (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT using HT for HCC showed favorable treatment outcomes. Radixact, the latest version, physically improved treatment efficiency by reducing treatment time and provided better organ sparing than Hi-ART.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9745378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97453782022-12-14 Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact Bae, Sun Hyun Cho, Kwang Hwan Jung, Jae Hong Kim, Young Seok Kim, Sang Gyune Yoo, Jeong-Ju Lee, Jae Myung Lee, Min Hee Jung, Jae Hong Lim, Sung Hee Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Helical tomotherapy (HT), a unique rotational dose delivery machine, has been updated from Hi-ART to Radixact. We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using HT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compared the dosimetric details of Hi-ART and Radixact. METHODS: Between April 2014 and November 2020, 28 patients with HCC were treated with SBRT using HT for a cure at Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, 9 patients had stage 0 disease, 12 had stage A, 4 had stage B, and 3 had stage C. The tumor size ranged from 1 cm to 8 cm (median, 2 cm). The SBRT dose ranged from 40 to 60 Gy (median, 48 Gy) with 4 fractions. Twenty-three patients were treated with Hi-ART and 5 patients were treated with Radixact. To compare the dosimetric parameters between Hi-ART and Radixact, we created treatment plans with the same constraints, pitch, modulation factor, and field width for the same patient in pairs. RESULTS: The median follow-up time from the date of SBRT administration was 24 months (range, 3–67 months). The local failure-free survival and intrahepatic failure-free survival rates were 96% and 58% at 1 year, 84% and 36% at 2 years, and 76% and 18% at 3 years, respectively. The overall survival rate was 93% at 1 year, 93% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years, respectively. When the paired treatment plans were reviewed, the beam-on time and intermediate dose-spillage were found to be significantly reduced in Radixact than Hi-ART (P<0.001). With regard to normal organ sparing, the irradiated dose to the total liver, normal liver, heart, and kidney was significantly lower with Radixact (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT using HT for HCC showed favorable treatment outcomes. Radixact, the latest version, physically improved treatment efficiency by reducing treatment time and provided better organ sparing than Hi-ART. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9745378/ /pubmed/36523318 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-1565 Text en 2022 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bae, Sun Hyun
Cho, Kwang Hwan
Jung, Jae Hong
Kim, Young Seok
Kim, Sang Gyune
Yoo, Jeong-Ju
Lee, Jae Myung
Lee, Min Hee
Jung, Jae Hong
Lim, Sung Hee
Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact
title Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact
title_full Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact
title_fullStr Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact
title_short Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact
title_sort stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of hi-art vs. radixact
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523318
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-1565
work_keys_str_mv AT baesunhyun stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT chokwanghwan stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT jungjaehong stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT kimyoungseok stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT kimsanggyune stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT yoojeongju stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT leejaemyung stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT leeminhee stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT jungjaehong stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact
AT limsunghee stereotacticbodyradiotherapyusinghelicaltomotherapyforhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicaloutcomeanddosimetriccomparisonofhiartvsradixact