Cargando…

Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sibanda, Vusumuzi, Raad, Marjan, Legg, Peter I, Chipperfield, Alex, Oliver, Matthew C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523668
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31431
_version_ 1784849141780709376
author Sibanda, Vusumuzi
Raad, Marjan
Legg, Peter I
Chipperfield, Alex
Oliver, Matthew C
author_facet Sibanda, Vusumuzi
Raad, Marjan
Legg, Peter I
Chipperfield, Alex
Oliver, Matthew C
author_sort Sibanda, Vusumuzi
collection PubMed
description Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed “pre-intervention”. Prospective “post-intervention” data were collected from April to October 2021. After “pre-intervention” data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with “no neurovascular documentation” pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9745387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97453872022-12-14 Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project Sibanda, Vusumuzi Raad, Marjan Legg, Peter I Chipperfield, Alex Oliver, Matthew C Cureus Emergency Medicine Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed “pre-intervention”. Prospective “post-intervention” data were collected from April to October 2021. After “pre-intervention” data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with “no neurovascular documentation” pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma. Cureus 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9745387/ /pubmed/36523668 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31431 Text en Copyright © 2022, Sibanda et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Sibanda, Vusumuzi
Raad, Marjan
Legg, Peter I
Chipperfield, Alex
Oliver, Matthew C
Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
title Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
title_fullStr Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
title_short Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
title_sort quality of documentation in paediatric supracondylar fractures: a quality improvement project
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523668
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31431
work_keys_str_mv AT sibandavusumuzi qualityofdocumentationinpaediatricsupracondylarfracturesaqualityimprovementproject
AT raadmarjan qualityofdocumentationinpaediatricsupracondylarfracturesaqualityimprovementproject
AT leggpeteri qualityofdocumentationinpaediatricsupracondylarfracturesaqualityimprovementproject
AT chipperfieldalex qualityofdocumentationinpaediatricsupracondylarfracturesaqualityimprovementproject
AT olivermatthewc qualityofdocumentationinpaediatricsupracondylarfracturesaqualityimprovementproject