Cargando…

Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease that is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall treatment paradigm for esophageal cancer has changed considerably over the past decade. This narrative review aims to summarize the current landscape of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jason, Ladbury, Colton, Tam, Andrew, Chao, Joseph, Kim, Jae, McGee, Heather M., Williams, Terence M., Amini, Arya, Chen, Yi-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36524066
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-939
_version_ 1784849165556121600
author Liu, Jason
Ladbury, Colton
Tam, Andrew
Chao, Joseph
Kim, Jae
McGee, Heather M.
Williams, Terence M.
Amini, Arya
Chen, Yi-Jen
author_facet Liu, Jason
Ladbury, Colton
Tam, Andrew
Chao, Joseph
Kim, Jae
McGee, Heather M.
Williams, Terence M.
Amini, Arya
Chen, Yi-Jen
author_sort Liu, Jason
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease that is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall treatment paradigm for esophageal cancer has changed considerably over the past decade. This narrative review aims to summarize the current landscape of radiation oncology for esophageal cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed, focusing on studies published within the last 10 years. Our search queried “esophageal cancer [AND] neoadjuvant radiation” as well as “locally advanced esophageal cancer [AND] definitive radiation”. Our search resulted in 298 total references. These were manually reviewed, and only 58 references were within our scope of interest ranging from 2012–2022. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: For resectable esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has been defined as the standard of care over the past decade. In patients with incomplete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the benefit of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting has recently been established. Ongoing studies are examining whether perioperative chemotherapy may be equivalent to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. For locally advanced esophageal cancer, recent studies have failed to show a benefit with radiation dose escalation in an unselected population, although the use of early positron emission tomography (PET) response to guide dose escalation is currently being studied. Other ongoing studies aiming to improve outcomes in locally advanced esophageal cancer involve using proton beam therapy to reduce toxicity and combining immunotherapy or targeted therapies with chemoradiation to amplify response. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in radiation oncology may continue to improve outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9745503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97455032022-12-14 Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review Liu, Jason Ladbury, Colton Tam, Andrew Chao, Joseph Kim, Jae McGee, Heather M. Williams, Terence M. Amini, Arya Chen, Yi-Jen J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease that is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall treatment paradigm for esophageal cancer has changed considerably over the past decade. This narrative review aims to summarize the current landscape of radiation oncology for esophageal cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed, focusing on studies published within the last 10 years. Our search queried “esophageal cancer [AND] neoadjuvant radiation” as well as “locally advanced esophageal cancer [AND] definitive radiation”. Our search resulted in 298 total references. These were manually reviewed, and only 58 references were within our scope of interest ranging from 2012–2022. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: For resectable esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has been defined as the standard of care over the past decade. In patients with incomplete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the benefit of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting has recently been established. Ongoing studies are examining whether perioperative chemotherapy may be equivalent to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. For locally advanced esophageal cancer, recent studies have failed to show a benefit with radiation dose escalation in an unselected population, although the use of early positron emission tomography (PET) response to guide dose escalation is currently being studied. Other ongoing studies aiming to improve outcomes in locally advanced esophageal cancer involve using proton beam therapy to reduce toxicity and combining immunotherapy or targeted therapies with chemoradiation to amplify response. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in radiation oncology may continue to improve outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9745503/ /pubmed/36524066 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-939 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Liu, Jason
Ladbury, Colton
Tam, Andrew
Chao, Joseph
Kim, Jae
McGee, Heather M.
Williams, Terence M.
Amini, Arya
Chen, Yi-Jen
Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review
title Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review
title_full Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review
title_fullStr Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review
title_short Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review
title_sort current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36524066
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-939
work_keys_str_mv AT liujason currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT ladburycolton currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT tamandrew currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT chaojoseph currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT kimjae currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT mcgeeheatherm currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT williamsterencem currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT aminiarya currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview
AT chenyijen currentlandscapeofradiationoncologyinesophagealcanceranarrativereview