Cargando…
What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study
INTRODUCTION: Given the rapid increase in novel treatments for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), this patient preference study aimed to establish which treatment attributes matter most to MM patients and evaluate discrete choice experiment (DCE) and swing weighting (SW) as two elicitation methods...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523996 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1027353 |
_version_ | 1784849229257113600 |
---|---|
author | Janssens, Rosanne Lang, Tamika Vallejo, Ana Galinsky, Jayne Morgan, Kate Plate, Ananda De Ronne, Chris Verschueren, Margaux Schoefs, Elise Vanhellemont, Anneleen Delforge, Michel Schjesvold, Fredrik Cabezudo, Elena Vandebroek, Martina Stevens, Hilde Simoens, Steven Huys, Isabelle |
author_facet | Janssens, Rosanne Lang, Tamika Vallejo, Ana Galinsky, Jayne Morgan, Kate Plate, Ananda De Ronne, Chris Verschueren, Margaux Schoefs, Elise Vanhellemont, Anneleen Delforge, Michel Schjesvold, Fredrik Cabezudo, Elena Vandebroek, Martina Stevens, Hilde Simoens, Steven Huys, Isabelle |
author_sort | Janssens, Rosanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Given the rapid increase in novel treatments for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), this patient preference study aimed to establish which treatment attributes matter most to MM patients and evaluate discrete choice experiment (DCE) and swing weighting (SW) as two elicitation methods for quantifying patients’ preferences. METHODS: A survey incorporating DCE and SW was disseminated among European MM patients. The survey included attributes and levels informed by a previous qualitative study with 24 MM patients. Latent class and mixed logit models were used to estimate the DCE attribute weights and descriptive analyses were performed to derive SW weights. MM patients and patient organisations provided extensive feedback during survey development. RESULTS: 393 MM patients across 21 countries completed the survey (M (years since diagnosis)=6; M (previous therapies)=3). Significant differences (p<.01) between participants’ attribute weights were revealed depending on participants’ prior therapy experience, and their experience with side-effects and symptoms. Multivariate analyses showed that participants across the three MM patient classes identified via the latent class model differed regarding their past number of therapies (F=4.772, p=.009). Patients with the most treatments (class 1) and those with the least treatments (class 3) attached more value to life expectancy versus quality of life-related attributes such as pain, mobility and thinking problems. Conversely, patients with intermediary treatment experience (class 2) attached more value to quality of life-related attributes versus life expectancy. Participants highlighted the difficulty of trading-off between life expectancy and quality of life and between physical and mental health. Participants expressed a need for greater psychological support to cope with their symptoms, treatment side-effects, and uncertainties. With respect to patients’ preferences for the DCE or SW questions, 42% had no preference, 32% preferred DCE, and 25% preferred SW. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life-related attributes affecting MM patients’ physical, mental and psychological health such as pain, mobility and thinking problems were considered very important to MM patients, next to life expectancy. This underscores a need to include such attributes in decision-making by healthcare stakeholders involved in MM drug development, evidence generation, evaluation, and clinical practice. This study highlights DCE as the preferred methodology for understanding relative attribute weights from a patient’s perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9745810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97458102022-12-14 What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study Janssens, Rosanne Lang, Tamika Vallejo, Ana Galinsky, Jayne Morgan, Kate Plate, Ananda De Ronne, Chris Verschueren, Margaux Schoefs, Elise Vanhellemont, Anneleen Delforge, Michel Schjesvold, Fredrik Cabezudo, Elena Vandebroek, Martina Stevens, Hilde Simoens, Steven Huys, Isabelle Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Given the rapid increase in novel treatments for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), this patient preference study aimed to establish which treatment attributes matter most to MM patients and evaluate discrete choice experiment (DCE) and swing weighting (SW) as two elicitation methods for quantifying patients’ preferences. METHODS: A survey incorporating DCE and SW was disseminated among European MM patients. The survey included attributes and levels informed by a previous qualitative study with 24 MM patients. Latent class and mixed logit models were used to estimate the DCE attribute weights and descriptive analyses were performed to derive SW weights. MM patients and patient organisations provided extensive feedback during survey development. RESULTS: 393 MM patients across 21 countries completed the survey (M (years since diagnosis)=6; M (previous therapies)=3). Significant differences (p<.01) between participants’ attribute weights were revealed depending on participants’ prior therapy experience, and their experience with side-effects and symptoms. Multivariate analyses showed that participants across the three MM patient classes identified via the latent class model differed regarding their past number of therapies (F=4.772, p=.009). Patients with the most treatments (class 1) and those with the least treatments (class 3) attached more value to life expectancy versus quality of life-related attributes such as pain, mobility and thinking problems. Conversely, patients with intermediary treatment experience (class 2) attached more value to quality of life-related attributes versus life expectancy. Participants highlighted the difficulty of trading-off between life expectancy and quality of life and between physical and mental health. Participants expressed a need for greater psychological support to cope with their symptoms, treatment side-effects, and uncertainties. With respect to patients’ preferences for the DCE or SW questions, 42% had no preference, 32% preferred DCE, and 25% preferred SW. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life-related attributes affecting MM patients’ physical, mental and psychological health such as pain, mobility and thinking problems were considered very important to MM patients, next to life expectancy. This underscores a need to include such attributes in decision-making by healthcare stakeholders involved in MM drug development, evidence generation, evaluation, and clinical practice. This study highlights DCE as the preferred methodology for understanding relative attribute weights from a patient’s perspective. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9745810/ /pubmed/36523996 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1027353 Text en Copyright © 2022 Janssens, Lang, Vallejo, Galinsky, Morgan, Plate, De Ronne, Verschueren, Schoefs, Vanhellemont, Delforge, Schjesvold, Cabezudo, Vandebroek, Stevens, Simoens and Huys https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Janssens, Rosanne Lang, Tamika Vallejo, Ana Galinsky, Jayne Morgan, Kate Plate, Ananda De Ronne, Chris Verschueren, Margaux Schoefs, Elise Vanhellemont, Anneleen Delforge, Michel Schjesvold, Fredrik Cabezudo, Elena Vandebroek, Martina Stevens, Hilde Simoens, Steven Huys, Isabelle What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study |
title | What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study |
title_full | What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study |
title_fullStr | What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study |
title_full_unstemmed | What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study |
title_short | What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study |
title_sort | what matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? a pan-european patient preference study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523996 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1027353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssensrosanne whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT langtamika whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT vallejoana whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT galinskyjayne whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT morgankate whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT plateananda whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT deronnechris whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT verschuerenmargaux whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT schoefselise whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT vanhellemontanneleen whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT delforgemichel whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT schjesvoldfredrik whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT cabezudoelena whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT vandebroekmartina whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT stevenshilde whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT simoenssteven whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy AT huysisabelle whatmattersmosttopatientswithmultiplemyelomaapaneuropeanpatientpreferencestudy |