Cargando…
The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to some of the most drastic changes in clinical care delivery ever seen in the United States. Almost overnight, providers of prenatal care adopted virtual visits and reduced visit schedules. These changes stood in stark contrast to the 12 to 14 in-person pre...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016 |
_version_ | 1784849249307983872 |
---|---|
author | Peahl, Alex F. Howell, Joel D. |
author_facet | Peahl, Alex F. Howell, Joel D. |
author_sort | Peahl, Alex F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to some of the most drastic changes in clinical care delivery ever seen in the United States. Almost overnight, providers of prenatal care adopted virtual visits and reduced visit schedules. These changes stood in stark contrast to the 12 to 14 in-person prenatal visit schedule that had been previously recommended for almost a century. As maternity care providers consider what prenatal care delivery changes we should maintain following the acute pandemic, we may gain insight from understanding the evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines. In this paper, we start by sketching out the relatively unstructured beginnings of prenatal care in the 19th century. Most medical care fell within the domain of laypeople, and childbirth was a central feature of female domestic culture. We explore how early discoveries about “toxemia” created the groundwork for future prenatal care interventions, including screening of urine and blood pressure—which in turn created a need for routine prenatal care visits. We then discuss the organization of the medical profession, including the field of obstetrics and gynecology. In the early 20th century, new data increasingly revealed high rates of both infant and maternal mortalities, leading to a greater emphasis on prenatal care. These discoveries culminated in the first codification of a prenatal visit schedule in 1930 by the Children’s Bureau. Surprisingly, this schedule remained essentially unchanged for almost a century. Through the founding of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, significant technological advancements in laboratory testing and ultrasonography, and calls of the National Institutes of Health Task Force for changes in prenatal care delivery in 1989, prenatal care recommendations continued to be the same as they had been in 1930—monthly visits until 28 weeks’ gestation, bimonthly visits until 36 weeks’ gestation, and weekly visits until delivery. However, coronavirus disease 2019 forced us to change, to reconsider both the need for in-person visits and frequency of visits. Currently, as we transition from the acute pandemic, we should consider how to use what we have learned in this unprecedented time to shape future prenatal care. Lessons from a century of prenatal care provide valuable insights to inform the next generation of prenatal care delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9745905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97459052022-12-13 The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States Peahl, Alex F. Howell, Joel D. Am J Obstet Gynecol Expert Reviews The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to some of the most drastic changes in clinical care delivery ever seen in the United States. Almost overnight, providers of prenatal care adopted virtual visits and reduced visit schedules. These changes stood in stark contrast to the 12 to 14 in-person prenatal visit schedule that had been previously recommended for almost a century. As maternity care providers consider what prenatal care delivery changes we should maintain following the acute pandemic, we may gain insight from understanding the evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines. In this paper, we start by sketching out the relatively unstructured beginnings of prenatal care in the 19th century. Most medical care fell within the domain of laypeople, and childbirth was a central feature of female domestic culture. We explore how early discoveries about “toxemia” created the groundwork for future prenatal care interventions, including screening of urine and blood pressure—which in turn created a need for routine prenatal care visits. We then discuss the organization of the medical profession, including the field of obstetrics and gynecology. In the early 20th century, new data increasingly revealed high rates of both infant and maternal mortalities, leading to a greater emphasis on prenatal care. These discoveries culminated in the first codification of a prenatal visit schedule in 1930 by the Children’s Bureau. Surprisingly, this schedule remained essentially unchanged for almost a century. Through the founding of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, significant technological advancements in laboratory testing and ultrasonography, and calls of the National Institutes of Health Task Force for changes in prenatal care delivery in 1989, prenatal care recommendations continued to be the same as they had been in 1930—monthly visits until 28 weeks’ gestation, bimonthly visits until 36 weeks’ gestation, and weekly visits until delivery. However, coronavirus disease 2019 forced us to change, to reconsider both the need for in-person visits and frequency of visits. Currently, as we transition from the acute pandemic, we should consider how to use what we have learned in this unprecedented time to shape future prenatal care. Lessons from a century of prenatal care provide valuable insights to inform the next generation of prenatal care delivery. Elsevier Inc. 2021-04 2020-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9745905/ /pubmed/33316276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Expert Reviews Peahl, Alex F. Howell, Joel D. The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States |
title | The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States |
title_full | The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States |
title_fullStr | The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States |
title_short | The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States |
title_sort | evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the united states |
topic | Expert Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peahlalexf theevolutionofprenatalcaredeliveryguidelinesintheunitedstates AT howelljoeld theevolutionofprenatalcaredeliveryguidelinesintheunitedstates AT peahlalexf evolutionofprenatalcaredeliveryguidelinesintheunitedstates AT howelljoeld evolutionofprenatalcaredeliveryguidelinesintheunitedstates |