Cargando…
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B‐cell maturation antigen have shown positive responses in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 2 portion of the CARTITUDE‐1 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel) included a cohort of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15556 |
_version_ | 1784849277779968000 |
---|---|
author | Ri, Masaki Suzuki, Kenshi Ishida, Tadao Kuroda, Junya Tsukamoto, Taku Teshima, Takanori Goto, Hideki Jackson, Carolyn C. Sun, Huabin Pacaud, Lida Fujikawa, Ei Yeh, Tzu‐Min Hatayama, Tomoyoshi Aida, Kensuke Sunagawa, Yoshihiro Iida, Shinsuke |
author_facet | Ri, Masaki Suzuki, Kenshi Ishida, Tadao Kuroda, Junya Tsukamoto, Taku Teshima, Takanori Goto, Hideki Jackson, Carolyn C. Sun, Huabin Pacaud, Lida Fujikawa, Ei Yeh, Tzu‐Min Hatayama, Tomoyoshi Aida, Kensuke Sunagawa, Yoshihiro Iida, Shinsuke |
author_sort | Ri, Masaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B‐cell maturation antigen have shown positive responses in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 2 portion of the CARTITUDE‐1 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel) included a cohort of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Following a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m(2)) and fludarabine (30 mg/m(2)), patients received a single cilta‐cel infusion at a target dose of 0.75 × 10(6) (range, 0.5–1.0 × 10(6)CAR‐positive viable T cells/kg). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; defined as partial response or better) by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A key secondary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (defined as VGPR, complete response, stringent complete response). This first analysis was performed at 6 months after the last patient received cilta‐cel. Thirteen patients underwent apheresis, nine of whom received cilta‐cel infusion. Eight patients who received cilta‐cel at the target dose responded, yielding an ORR of 100%. Seven of eight (87.5%) patients achieved a VGPR or better. One additional patient who received a below‐target dose of cilta‐cel also achieved a best response of VGPR. MRD negativity (10(−5) threshold) was achieved in all six evaluable patients. Eight of nine (88.9%) patients who received cilta‐cel infusion experienced a grade 3 or 4 adverse event, and eight (88.9%) patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2). No CAR‐T cell neurotoxicity was reported. A positive benefit/risk profile for cilta‐cel was established for heavily pretreated Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory MM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9746030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97460302022-12-14 Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort Ri, Masaki Suzuki, Kenshi Ishida, Tadao Kuroda, Junya Tsukamoto, Taku Teshima, Takanori Goto, Hideki Jackson, Carolyn C. Sun, Huabin Pacaud, Lida Fujikawa, Ei Yeh, Tzu‐Min Hatayama, Tomoyoshi Aida, Kensuke Sunagawa, Yoshihiro Iida, Shinsuke Cancer Sci ORIGINAL ARTICLES Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B‐cell maturation antigen have shown positive responses in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 2 portion of the CARTITUDE‐1 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel) included a cohort of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Following a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m(2)) and fludarabine (30 mg/m(2)), patients received a single cilta‐cel infusion at a target dose of 0.75 × 10(6) (range, 0.5–1.0 × 10(6)CAR‐positive viable T cells/kg). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; defined as partial response or better) by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A key secondary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (defined as VGPR, complete response, stringent complete response). This first analysis was performed at 6 months after the last patient received cilta‐cel. Thirteen patients underwent apheresis, nine of whom received cilta‐cel infusion. Eight patients who received cilta‐cel at the target dose responded, yielding an ORR of 100%. Seven of eight (87.5%) patients achieved a VGPR or better. One additional patient who received a below‐target dose of cilta‐cel also achieved a best response of VGPR. MRD negativity (10(−5) threshold) was achieved in all six evaluable patients. Eight of nine (88.9%) patients who received cilta‐cel infusion experienced a grade 3 or 4 adverse event, and eight (88.9%) patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2). No CAR‐T cell neurotoxicity was reported. A positive benefit/risk profile for cilta‐cel was established for heavily pretreated Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory MM. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-07 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9746030/ /pubmed/36052883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15556 Text en © 2022 Janssen Research and Development, LLC. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLES Ri, Masaki Suzuki, Kenshi Ishida, Tadao Kuroda, Junya Tsukamoto, Taku Teshima, Takanori Goto, Hideki Jackson, Carolyn C. Sun, Huabin Pacaud, Lida Fujikawa, Ei Yeh, Tzu‐Min Hatayama, Tomoyoshi Aida, Kensuke Sunagawa, Yoshihiro Iida, Shinsuke Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort |
title | Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort |
title_full | Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort |
title_fullStr | Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort |
title_short | Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort |
title_sort | ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: cartitude‐1 (phase 2) japanese cohort |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rimasaki ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT suzukikenshi ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT ishidatadao ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT kurodajunya ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT tsukamototaku ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT teshimatakanori ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT gotohideki ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT jacksoncarolync ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT sunhuabin ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT pacaudlida ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT fujikawaei ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT yehtzumin ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT hatayamatomoyoshi ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT aidakensuke ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT sunagawayoshihiro ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort AT iidashinsuke ciltacabtageneautoleucelinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacartitude1phase2japanesecohort |