Cargando…

The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis

Novel messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have proven to be effective tools against coronavirus disease 2019, and they have changed the course of the pandemic. However, early reports of mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis resulted in public alarm, contributing toward vaccine hesitancy. Although initial repor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalid, Muhammad Bilal, Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, Pamela A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacig.2022.10.003
_version_ 1784849287113342976
author Khalid, Muhammad Bilal
Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, Pamela A.
author_facet Khalid, Muhammad Bilal
Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, Pamela A.
author_sort Khalid, Muhammad Bilal
collection PubMed
description Novel messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have proven to be effective tools against coronavirus disease 2019, and they have changed the course of the pandemic. However, early reports of mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis resulted in public alarm, contributing toward vaccine hesitancy. Although initial reports were concerning for an unusually high rate of anaphylaxis to the mRNA vaccines, the true incidence is likely comparable with other vaccines. These reactions occurred predominantly in young to middle-aged females, and many had a history of allergies. Although initially thought to be triggered by polyethylene glycol (PEG), lack of reproducibility of these reactions with subsequent dosing and absent PEG sensitization point away from an IgE-mediated PEG allergy in most. PEG skin testing has poor posttest probability and should be reserved for evaluating non–vaccine-related PEG allergy without influencing decisions for subsequent mRNA vaccination. Immunization stress–related response can closely mimic vaccine-induced anaphylaxis and warrants consideration as a potential etiology. Current evidence suggests that many individuals who developed anaphylaxis to the first dose of an mRNA vaccine can likely receive a subsequent dose after careful evaluation. The need to understand these reactions mechanistically remains critical because the mRNA platform is rapidly finding its way into other vaccinations and therapeutics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9746073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97460732022-12-13 The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis Khalid, Muhammad Bilal Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, Pamela A. J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob Review Article Novel messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have proven to be effective tools against coronavirus disease 2019, and they have changed the course of the pandemic. However, early reports of mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis resulted in public alarm, contributing toward vaccine hesitancy. Although initial reports were concerning for an unusually high rate of anaphylaxis to the mRNA vaccines, the true incidence is likely comparable with other vaccines. These reactions occurred predominantly in young to middle-aged females, and many had a history of allergies. Although initially thought to be triggered by polyethylene glycol (PEG), lack of reproducibility of these reactions with subsequent dosing and absent PEG sensitization point away from an IgE-mediated PEG allergy in most. PEG skin testing has poor posttest probability and should be reserved for evaluating non–vaccine-related PEG allergy without influencing decisions for subsequent mRNA vaccination. Immunization stress–related response can closely mimic vaccine-induced anaphylaxis and warrants consideration as a potential etiology. Current evidence suggests that many individuals who developed anaphylaxis to the first dose of an mRNA vaccine can likely receive a subsequent dose after careful evaluation. The need to understand these reactions mechanistically remains critical because the mRNA platform is rapidly finding its way into other vaccinations and therapeutics. Elsevier 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9746073/ /pubmed/36532656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacig.2022.10.003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Khalid, Muhammad Bilal
Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, Pamela A.
The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis
title The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis
title_full The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis
title_fullStr The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis
title_full_unstemmed The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis
title_short The conundrum of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine–induced anaphylaxis
title_sort conundrum of covid-19 mrna vaccine–induced anaphylaxis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacig.2022.10.003
work_keys_str_mv AT khalidmuhammadbilal theconundrumofcovid19mrnavaccineinducedanaphylaxis
AT frischmeyerguerreriopamelaa theconundrumofcovid19mrnavaccineinducedanaphylaxis
AT khalidmuhammadbilal conundrumofcovid19mrnavaccineinducedanaphylaxis
AT frischmeyerguerreriopamelaa conundrumofcovid19mrnavaccineinducedanaphylaxis