Cargando…
Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are transforming the optimization of clinical and patient workflows in healthcare. There is a need for research to specify clinical requirements for AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling systems to improve human–AI interaction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36510176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08780-y |
_version_ | 1784849287585202176 |
---|---|
author | Jansson, Miia Ohtonen, Pasi Alalääkkölä, Timo Heikkinen, Juuso Mäkiniemi, Minna Lahtinen, Sanna Lahtela, Riikka Ahonen, Merja Jämsä, Sirpa Liisantti, Janne |
author_facet | Jansson, Miia Ohtonen, Pasi Alalääkkölä, Timo Heikkinen, Juuso Mäkiniemi, Minna Lahtinen, Sanna Lahtela, Riikka Ahonen, Merja Jämsä, Sirpa Liisantti, Janne |
author_sort | Jansson, Miia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are transforming the optimization of clinical and patient workflows in healthcare. There is a need for research to specify clinical requirements for AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling systems to improve human–AI interaction in machine learning applications. The aim of this study was to assess content validity and prioritize the most relevant functionalities of an AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system. METHODS: A prospective content validity assessment was conducted in five university hospitals in three different countries using an electronic survey. The content of the survey was formed from clinical requirements, which were formulated into generic statements of required AI functionalities. The relevancy of each statement was evaluated using a content validity index. In addition, weighted ranking points were calculated to prioritize the most relevant functionalities of an AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system. RESULTS: A total of 50 responses were received from clinical professionals from three European countries. An item-level content validity index ranged from 0.42 to 0.96. 45% of the generic statements were considered good. The highest ranked functionalities for an AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system were related to risk assessment, patient profiling, and resources. The highest ranked functionalities for the user interface were related to the explainability of machine learning models. CONCLUSION: This study provided a comprehensive list of functionalities that can be used to design future AI-enhanced solutions and evaluate the designed solutions against requirements. The relevance of statements concerning the AI functionalities were considered somewhat relevant, which might be due to the low level or organizational readiness for AI in healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9746075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97460752022-12-14 Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities Jansson, Miia Ohtonen, Pasi Alalääkkölä, Timo Heikkinen, Juuso Mäkiniemi, Minna Lahtinen, Sanna Lahtela, Riikka Ahonen, Merja Jämsä, Sirpa Liisantti, Janne BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are transforming the optimization of clinical and patient workflows in healthcare. There is a need for research to specify clinical requirements for AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling systems to improve human–AI interaction in machine learning applications. The aim of this study was to assess content validity and prioritize the most relevant functionalities of an AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system. METHODS: A prospective content validity assessment was conducted in five university hospitals in three different countries using an electronic survey. The content of the survey was formed from clinical requirements, which were formulated into generic statements of required AI functionalities. The relevancy of each statement was evaluated using a content validity index. In addition, weighted ranking points were calculated to prioritize the most relevant functionalities of an AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system. RESULTS: A total of 50 responses were received from clinical professionals from three European countries. An item-level content validity index ranged from 0.42 to 0.96. 45% of the generic statements were considered good. The highest ranked functionalities for an AI-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system were related to risk assessment, patient profiling, and resources. The highest ranked functionalities for the user interface were related to the explainability of machine learning models. CONCLUSION: This study provided a comprehensive list of functionalities that can be used to design future AI-enhanced solutions and evaluate the designed solutions against requirements. The relevance of statements concerning the AI functionalities were considered somewhat relevant, which might be due to the low level or organizational readiness for AI in healthcare. BioMed Central 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9746075/ /pubmed/36510176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08780-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jansson, Miia Ohtonen, Pasi Alalääkkölä, Timo Heikkinen, Juuso Mäkiniemi, Minna Lahtinen, Sanna Lahtela, Riikka Ahonen, Merja Jämsä, Sirpa Liisantti, Janne Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities |
title | Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities |
title_full | Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities |
title_short | Artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities |
title_sort | artificial intelligence-enhanced care pathway planning and scheduling system: content validity assessment of required functionalities |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36510176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08780-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssonmiia artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT ohtonenpasi artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT alalaakkolatimo artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT heikkinenjuuso artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT makiniemiminna artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT lahtinensanna artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT lahtelariikka artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT ahonenmerja artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT jamsasirpa artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities AT liisanttijanne artificialintelligenceenhancedcarepathwayplanningandschedulingsystemcontentvalidityassessmentofrequiredfunctionalities |