Cargando…
Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox
Carcinogenesis is one of the leading health concerns afflicting presumably every single animal species, including humans. Currently, cancer research expands considerably beyond medicine, becoming a focus in other branches of natural science. Accumulating evidence suggests that a proportional scale o...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02096-5 |
_version_ | 1784849300992294912 |
---|---|
author | Maciak, Sebastian |
author_facet | Maciak, Sebastian |
author_sort | Maciak, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carcinogenesis is one of the leading health concerns afflicting presumably every single animal species, including humans. Currently, cancer research expands considerably beyond medicine, becoming a focus in other branches of natural science. Accumulating evidence suggests that a proportional scale of tumor deaths involves domestic and wild animals and poses economical or conservation threats to many species. Therefore, understanding the genetic and physiological mechanisms of cancer initiation and its progression is essential for our future action and contingent prevention. From this perspective, I used an evolutionary-based approach to re-evaluate the baseline for debate around Peto’s paradox. First, I review the background of information on which current understanding of Peto’s paradox and evolutionary concept of carcinogenesis have been founded. The weak points and limitations of theoretical modeling or indirect reasoning in studies based on intraspecific, comparative studies of carcinogenesis are highlighted. This is then followed by detail discussion of an effect of the body mass in cancer research and the importance of cell size in consideration of body architecture; also, I note to the ambiguity around cell size invariance hypothesis and hard data for variability of cell size across species are provided. Finally, I point to the new research area that is driving concepts to identify exact molecular mechanisms promoting the process of tumorigenesis, which in turn may provide a proximate explanation of Peto’s paradox. The novelty of the approach proposed therein lies in intraspecies testing of the effect of differentiation of cell size/number on the probability of carcinogenesis while controlling for the confounding effect of body mass/size. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-022-02096-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9746147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97461472022-12-14 Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox Maciak, Sebastian BMC Ecol Evol Review Carcinogenesis is one of the leading health concerns afflicting presumably every single animal species, including humans. Currently, cancer research expands considerably beyond medicine, becoming a focus in other branches of natural science. Accumulating evidence suggests that a proportional scale of tumor deaths involves domestic and wild animals and poses economical or conservation threats to many species. Therefore, understanding the genetic and physiological mechanisms of cancer initiation and its progression is essential for our future action and contingent prevention. From this perspective, I used an evolutionary-based approach to re-evaluate the baseline for debate around Peto’s paradox. First, I review the background of information on which current understanding of Peto’s paradox and evolutionary concept of carcinogenesis have been founded. The weak points and limitations of theoretical modeling or indirect reasoning in studies based on intraspecific, comparative studies of carcinogenesis are highlighted. This is then followed by detail discussion of an effect of the body mass in cancer research and the importance of cell size in consideration of body architecture; also, I note to the ambiguity around cell size invariance hypothesis and hard data for variability of cell size across species are provided. Finally, I point to the new research area that is driving concepts to identify exact molecular mechanisms promoting the process of tumorigenesis, which in turn may provide a proximate explanation of Peto’s paradox. The novelty of the approach proposed therein lies in intraspecies testing of the effect of differentiation of cell size/number on the probability of carcinogenesis while controlling for the confounding effect of body mass/size. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-022-02096-5. BioMed Central 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9746147/ /pubmed/36513976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02096-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Maciak, Sebastian Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox |
title | Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox |
title_full | Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox |
title_fullStr | Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox |
title_short | Cell size, body size and Peto’s paradox |
title_sort | cell size, body size and peto’s paradox |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02096-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maciaksebastian cellsizebodysizeandpetosparadox |