Cargando…

Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis

Although the burden of diphtheria has declined greatly since the introduction of vaccines, sporadic outbreaks continue to be reported. WHO recommends booster doses after a primary series, but questions remain about the optimal interval between these doses. We conducted a systematic review and quanti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitamura, Noriko, Bahkali, Khawater, Chem, Elvis D, Quilty, Billy J, Edwards, Tansy, Toizumi, Michiko, Yoshida, Lay-Myint
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2099700
_version_ 1784849342144708608
author Kitamura, Noriko
Bahkali, Khawater
Chem, Elvis D
Quilty, Billy J
Edwards, Tansy
Toizumi, Michiko
Yoshida, Lay-Myint
author_facet Kitamura, Noriko
Bahkali, Khawater
Chem, Elvis D
Quilty, Billy J
Edwards, Tansy
Toizumi, Michiko
Yoshida, Lay-Myint
author_sort Kitamura, Noriko
collection PubMed
description Although the burden of diphtheria has declined greatly since the introduction of vaccines, sporadic outbreaks continue to be reported. WHO recommends booster doses after a primary series, but questions remain about the optimal interval between these doses. We conducted a systematic review and quantitative data analysis to quantify the duration of protective immunity after different numbers of doses. Fifteen cross-sectional seroprevalence studies provided data on geometric mean concentration (GMC). Single-year age-stratified GMCs were analyzed using a mixed-effect linear regression model with a random intercept incorporating the between-country variability. GMC was estimated to decline to 0.1 IU/ml in 2.5 years (95% CI: 0.9–4.0), 10.3 years (95% CI: 7.1–13.6), and 25.1 years (95% CI: 7.6–42.6) after receiving three, four and five doses, respectively. The results drawn from cross-sectional data collected in countries with different epidemiologies, vaccines, and schedules had several limitations. However, these analyses contribute to the discussion of optimal timing between booster doses of diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9746369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97463692022-12-14 Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis Kitamura, Noriko Bahkali, Khawater Chem, Elvis D Quilty, Billy J Edwards, Tansy Toizumi, Michiko Yoshida, Lay-Myint Hum Vaccin Immunother Licensed Vaccines – Review Although the burden of diphtheria has declined greatly since the introduction of vaccines, sporadic outbreaks continue to be reported. WHO recommends booster doses after a primary series, but questions remain about the optimal interval between these doses. We conducted a systematic review and quantitative data analysis to quantify the duration of protective immunity after different numbers of doses. Fifteen cross-sectional seroprevalence studies provided data on geometric mean concentration (GMC). Single-year age-stratified GMCs were analyzed using a mixed-effect linear regression model with a random intercept incorporating the between-country variability. GMC was estimated to decline to 0.1 IU/ml in 2.5 years (95% CI: 0.9–4.0), 10.3 years (95% CI: 7.1–13.6), and 25.1 years (95% CI: 7.6–42.6) after receiving three, four and five doses, respectively. The results drawn from cross-sectional data collected in countries with different epidemiologies, vaccines, and schedules had several limitations. However, these analyses contribute to the discussion of optimal timing between booster doses of diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine. Taylor & Francis 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9746369/ /pubmed/35862651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2099700 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Licensed Vaccines – Review
Kitamura, Noriko
Bahkali, Khawater
Chem, Elvis D
Quilty, Billy J
Edwards, Tansy
Toizumi, Michiko
Yoshida, Lay-Myint
Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis
title Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis
title_full Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis
title_fullStr Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis
title_short Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis
title_sort waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: systematic review and quantitative data analysis
topic Licensed Vaccines – Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2099700
work_keys_str_mv AT kitamuranoriko waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis
AT bahkalikhawater waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis
AT chemelvisd waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis
AT quiltybillyj waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis
AT edwardstansy waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis
AT toizumimichiko waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis
AT yoshidalaymyint waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis