Cargando…
Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis
Although the burden of diphtheria has declined greatly since the introduction of vaccines, sporadic outbreaks continue to be reported. WHO recommends booster doses after a primary series, but questions remain about the optimal interval between these doses. We conducted a systematic review and quanti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2099700 |
_version_ | 1784849342144708608 |
---|---|
author | Kitamura, Noriko Bahkali, Khawater Chem, Elvis D Quilty, Billy J Edwards, Tansy Toizumi, Michiko Yoshida, Lay-Myint |
author_facet | Kitamura, Noriko Bahkali, Khawater Chem, Elvis D Quilty, Billy J Edwards, Tansy Toizumi, Michiko Yoshida, Lay-Myint |
author_sort | Kitamura, Noriko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the burden of diphtheria has declined greatly since the introduction of vaccines, sporadic outbreaks continue to be reported. WHO recommends booster doses after a primary series, but questions remain about the optimal interval between these doses. We conducted a systematic review and quantitative data analysis to quantify the duration of protective immunity after different numbers of doses. Fifteen cross-sectional seroprevalence studies provided data on geometric mean concentration (GMC). Single-year age-stratified GMCs were analyzed using a mixed-effect linear regression model with a random intercept incorporating the between-country variability. GMC was estimated to decline to 0.1 IU/ml in 2.5 years (95% CI: 0.9–4.0), 10.3 years (95% CI: 7.1–13.6), and 25.1 years (95% CI: 7.6–42.6) after receiving three, four and five doses, respectively. The results drawn from cross-sectional data collected in countries with different epidemiologies, vaccines, and schedules had several limitations. However, these analyses contribute to the discussion of optimal timing between booster doses of diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9746369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97463692022-12-14 Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis Kitamura, Noriko Bahkali, Khawater Chem, Elvis D Quilty, Billy J Edwards, Tansy Toizumi, Michiko Yoshida, Lay-Myint Hum Vaccin Immunother Licensed Vaccines – Review Although the burden of diphtheria has declined greatly since the introduction of vaccines, sporadic outbreaks continue to be reported. WHO recommends booster doses after a primary series, but questions remain about the optimal interval between these doses. We conducted a systematic review and quantitative data analysis to quantify the duration of protective immunity after different numbers of doses. Fifteen cross-sectional seroprevalence studies provided data on geometric mean concentration (GMC). Single-year age-stratified GMCs were analyzed using a mixed-effect linear regression model with a random intercept incorporating the between-country variability. GMC was estimated to decline to 0.1 IU/ml in 2.5 years (95% CI: 0.9–4.0), 10.3 years (95% CI: 7.1–13.6), and 25.1 years (95% CI: 7.6–42.6) after receiving three, four and five doses, respectively. The results drawn from cross-sectional data collected in countries with different epidemiologies, vaccines, and schedules had several limitations. However, these analyses contribute to the discussion of optimal timing between booster doses of diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine. Taylor & Francis 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9746369/ /pubmed/35862651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2099700 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Licensed Vaccines – Review Kitamura, Noriko Bahkali, Khawater Chem, Elvis D Quilty, Billy J Edwards, Tansy Toizumi, Michiko Yoshida, Lay-Myint Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis |
title | Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis |
title_full | Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis |
title_fullStr | Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis |
title_short | Waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: Systematic review and quantitative data analysis |
title_sort | waning rate of immunity and duration of protective immunity against diphtheria toxoid as a function of age and number of doses: systematic review and quantitative data analysis |
topic | Licensed Vaccines – Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2099700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitamuranoriko waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis AT bahkalikhawater waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis AT chemelvisd waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis AT quiltybillyj waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis AT edwardstansy waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis AT toizumimichiko waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis AT yoshidalaymyint waningrateofimmunityanddurationofprotectiveimmunityagainstdiphtheriatoxoidasafunctionofageandnumberofdosessystematicreviewandquantitativedataanalysis |