Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: In the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), for those patients with negative PD-L1 expression, which treatment strategy has the better efficacy and safety between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is sti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jiaqi, Chen, Yingjie, Hu, Fan, Qiang, Huiping, Chang, Qing, Qian, Jialin, Shen, Yinchen, Cai, Yong, Chu, Tianqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001503
_version_ 1784849420633767936
author Li, Jiaqi
Chen, Yingjie
Hu, Fan
Qiang, Huiping
Chang, Qing
Qian, Jialin
Shen, Yinchen
Cai, Yong
Chu, Tianqing
author_facet Li, Jiaqi
Chen, Yingjie
Hu, Fan
Qiang, Huiping
Chang, Qing
Qian, Jialin
Shen, Yinchen
Cai, Yong
Chu, Tianqing
author_sort Li, Jiaqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), for those patients with negative PD-L1 expression, which treatment strategy has the better efficacy and safety between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still unclear due to the absence of head-to-head clinical trials. This study aims to answer the question by performing a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were systematically searched accordingly to extract eligible studies from inception to October 2022, as well as the abstracts from the most recent main oncology congresses (American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) of grades 3 to 5 were independently extracted and collected by two reviewers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We used Cochrane’s risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials through RevMan 5.3 to ascertain the quality of the included studies. NMA with a Bayesian random-effects model was performed by R (version 4.0.4). RESULTS: According to the ranking list from OS-NMA, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has the most effective ranking first (surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) = 0.809844) (pooled HR = 0.65 [0.51–0.83]). On PFS, the triple combination of nivolumab/bevacizumab/chemotherapy ranks first (NMA estimate: HR = 0.35 [0.28–0.43]). On safety, in combination with chemotherapy, sintilimab has minimal toxicity, followed by pembrolizumab+chemo. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced NSCLC patients with negative PD-L1 expression, pembrolizumab+chemo ranks first in the efficacy of OS and does not apparently increase the incidence of any grade ≥ 3 AE as compared with chemo alone. On PFS, pembrolizumab also has advantages, but for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, camrelizumab+chemo seems to be a better choice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021231441.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9746688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97466882022-12-14 Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis Li, Jiaqi Chen, Yingjie Hu, Fan Qiang, Huiping Chang, Qing Qian, Jialin Shen, Yinchen Cai, Yong Chu, Tianqing Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: In the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), for those patients with negative PD-L1 expression, which treatment strategy has the better efficacy and safety between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still unclear due to the absence of head-to-head clinical trials. This study aims to answer the question by performing a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were systematically searched accordingly to extract eligible studies from inception to October 2022, as well as the abstracts from the most recent main oncology congresses (American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) of grades 3 to 5 were independently extracted and collected by two reviewers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We used Cochrane’s risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials through RevMan 5.3 to ascertain the quality of the included studies. NMA with a Bayesian random-effects model was performed by R (version 4.0.4). RESULTS: According to the ranking list from OS-NMA, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has the most effective ranking first (surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) = 0.809844) (pooled HR = 0.65 [0.51–0.83]). On PFS, the triple combination of nivolumab/bevacizumab/chemotherapy ranks first (NMA estimate: HR = 0.35 [0.28–0.43]). On safety, in combination with chemotherapy, sintilimab has minimal toxicity, followed by pembrolizumab+chemo. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced NSCLC patients with negative PD-L1 expression, pembrolizumab+chemo ranks first in the efficacy of OS and does not apparently increase the incidence of any grade ≥ 3 AE as compared with chemo alone. On PFS, pembrolizumab also has advantages, but for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, camrelizumab+chemo seems to be a better choice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021231441. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9746688/ /pubmed/36523992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001503 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Chen, Hu, Qiang, Chang, Qian, Shen, Cai and Chu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Li, Jiaqi
Chen, Yingjie
Hu, Fan
Qiang, Huiping
Chang, Qing
Qian, Jialin
Shen, Yinchen
Cai, Yong
Chu, Tianqing
Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis
title Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative pd-l1 expression: a network meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001503
work_keys_str_mv AT lijiaqi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenyingjie comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT hufan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT qianghuiping comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT changqing comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT qianjialin comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT shenyinchen comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT caiyong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chutianqing comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyinthetreatmentstrategiesbetweenchemotherapycombinedwithantiangiogenicandwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswithnegativepdl1expressionanetworkmetaanalysis