Cargando…
Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib is a switch-control TKI approved for advanced GIST after prior treatment with three or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared efficacy and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00294 |
_version_ | 1784849438627332096 |
---|---|
author | Bauer, Sebastian Jones, Robin L. Blay, Jean-Yves Gelderblom, Hans George, Suzanne Schöffski, Patrick von Mehren, Margaret Zalcberg, John R. Kang, Yoon-Koo Razak, Albiruni Abdul Trent, Jonathan Attia, Steven Le Cesne, Axel Su, Ying Meade, Julie Wang, Tao Sherman, Matthew L. Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo Heinrich, Michael C. |
author_facet | Bauer, Sebastian Jones, Robin L. Blay, Jean-Yves Gelderblom, Hans George, Suzanne Schöffski, Patrick von Mehren, Margaret Zalcberg, John R. Kang, Yoon-Koo Razak, Albiruni Abdul Trent, Jonathan Attia, Steven Le Cesne, Axel Su, Ying Meade, Julie Wang, Tao Sherman, Matthew L. Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo Heinrich, Michael C. |
author_sort | Bauer, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib is a switch-control TKI approved for advanced GIST after prior treatment with three or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST who were previously treated with imatinib (INTRIGUE, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Random assignment was 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and stratified by KIT/platelet-derived growth factor α mutation and imatinib intolerance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included objective response rate by independent radiologic review, safety, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Overall, 453 patients were randomly assigned to ripretinib (intention-to-treat [ITT], n = 226; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 163) or sunitinib (ITT, n = 227; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 164). Median PFS for ripretinib and sunitinib (KIT exon 11 ITT) was 8.3 and 7.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.16; P = .36); median PFS (ITT) was 8.0 and 8.3 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; nominal P = .72). Neither was statistically significant. Objective response rate was higher for ripretinib versus sunitinib in the KIT exon 11 ITT population (23.9% v 14.6%, nominal P = .03). Ripretinib was associated with a more favorable safety profile, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (41.3% v 65.6%, nominal P < .0001), and better scores on patient-reported outcome measures of tolerability. CONCLUSION: Ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of PFS. However, meaningful clinical activity, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, and improved tolerability were observed with ripretinib. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9746771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97467712022-12-14 Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial Bauer, Sebastian Jones, Robin L. Blay, Jean-Yves Gelderblom, Hans George, Suzanne Schöffski, Patrick von Mehren, Margaret Zalcberg, John R. Kang, Yoon-Koo Razak, Albiruni Abdul Trent, Jonathan Attia, Steven Le Cesne, Axel Su, Ying Meade, Julie Wang, Tao Sherman, Matthew L. Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo Heinrich, Michael C. J Clin Oncol Original Reports Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib is a switch-control TKI approved for advanced GIST after prior treatment with three or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST who were previously treated with imatinib (INTRIGUE, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Random assignment was 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and stratified by KIT/platelet-derived growth factor α mutation and imatinib intolerance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included objective response rate by independent radiologic review, safety, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Overall, 453 patients were randomly assigned to ripretinib (intention-to-treat [ITT], n = 226; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 163) or sunitinib (ITT, n = 227; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 164). Median PFS for ripretinib and sunitinib (KIT exon 11 ITT) was 8.3 and 7.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.16; P = .36); median PFS (ITT) was 8.0 and 8.3 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; nominal P = .72). Neither was statistically significant. Objective response rate was higher for ripretinib versus sunitinib in the KIT exon 11 ITT population (23.9% v 14.6%, nominal P = .03). Ripretinib was associated with a more favorable safety profile, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (41.3% v 65.6%, nominal P < .0001), and better scores on patient-reported outcome measures of tolerability. CONCLUSION: Ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of PFS. However, meaningful clinical activity, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, and improved tolerability were observed with ripretinib. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-12-01 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9746771/ /pubmed/35947817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00294 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Reports Bauer, Sebastian Jones, Robin L. Blay, Jean-Yves Gelderblom, Hans George, Suzanne Schöffski, Patrick von Mehren, Margaret Zalcberg, John R. Kang, Yoon-Koo Razak, Albiruni Abdul Trent, Jonathan Attia, Steven Le Cesne, Axel Su, Ying Meade, Julie Wang, Tao Sherman, Matthew L. Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo Heinrich, Michael C. Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial |
title | Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial |
title_full | Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial |
title_fullStr | Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial |
title_short | Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial |
title_sort | ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after treatment with imatinib (intrigue): a randomized, open-label, phase iii trial |
topic | Original Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bauersebastian ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT jonesrobinl ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT blayjeanyves ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT gelderblomhans ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT georgesuzanne ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT schoffskipatrick ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT vonmehrenmargaret ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT zalcbergjohnr ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT kangyoonkoo ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT razakalbiruniabdul ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT trentjonathan ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT attiasteven ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT lecesneaxel ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT suying ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT meadejulie ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT wangtao ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT shermanmatthewl ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT ruizsotorodrigo ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial AT heinrichmichaelc ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial |