Cargando…

Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib is a switch-control TKI approved for advanced GIST after prior treatment with three or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared efficacy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, Sebastian, Jones, Robin L., Blay, Jean-Yves, Gelderblom, Hans, George, Suzanne, Schöffski, Patrick, von Mehren, Margaret, Zalcberg, John R., Kang, Yoon-Koo, Razak, Albiruni Abdul, Trent, Jonathan, Attia, Steven, Le Cesne, Axel, Su, Ying, Meade, Julie, Wang, Tao, Sherman, Matthew L., Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo, Heinrich, Michael C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00294
_version_ 1784849438627332096
author Bauer, Sebastian
Jones, Robin L.
Blay, Jean-Yves
Gelderblom, Hans
George, Suzanne
Schöffski, Patrick
von Mehren, Margaret
Zalcberg, John R.
Kang, Yoon-Koo
Razak, Albiruni Abdul
Trent, Jonathan
Attia, Steven
Le Cesne, Axel
Su, Ying
Meade, Julie
Wang, Tao
Sherman, Matthew L.
Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo
Heinrich, Michael C.
author_facet Bauer, Sebastian
Jones, Robin L.
Blay, Jean-Yves
Gelderblom, Hans
George, Suzanne
Schöffski, Patrick
von Mehren, Margaret
Zalcberg, John R.
Kang, Yoon-Koo
Razak, Albiruni Abdul
Trent, Jonathan
Attia, Steven
Le Cesne, Axel
Su, Ying
Meade, Julie
Wang, Tao
Sherman, Matthew L.
Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo
Heinrich, Michael C.
author_sort Bauer, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib is a switch-control TKI approved for advanced GIST after prior treatment with three or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST who were previously treated with imatinib (INTRIGUE, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Random assignment was 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and stratified by KIT/platelet-derived growth factor α mutation and imatinib intolerance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included objective response rate by independent radiologic review, safety, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Overall, 453 patients were randomly assigned to ripretinib (intention-to-treat [ITT], n = 226; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 163) or sunitinib (ITT, n = 227; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 164). Median PFS for ripretinib and sunitinib (KIT exon 11 ITT) was 8.3 and 7.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.16; P = .36); median PFS (ITT) was 8.0 and 8.3 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; nominal P = .72). Neither was statistically significant. Objective response rate was higher for ripretinib versus sunitinib in the KIT exon 11 ITT population (23.9% v 14.6%, nominal P = .03). Ripretinib was associated with a more favorable safety profile, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (41.3% v 65.6%, nominal P < .0001), and better scores on patient-reported outcome measures of tolerability. CONCLUSION: Ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of PFS. However, meaningful clinical activity, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, and improved tolerability were observed with ripretinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9746771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97467712022-12-14 Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial Bauer, Sebastian Jones, Robin L. Blay, Jean-Yves Gelderblom, Hans George, Suzanne Schöffski, Patrick von Mehren, Margaret Zalcberg, John R. Kang, Yoon-Koo Razak, Albiruni Abdul Trent, Jonathan Attia, Steven Le Cesne, Axel Su, Ying Meade, Julie Wang, Tao Sherman, Matthew L. Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo Heinrich, Michael C. J Clin Oncol Original Reports Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib is a switch-control TKI approved for advanced GIST after prior treatment with three or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST who were previously treated with imatinib (INTRIGUE, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Random assignment was 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and stratified by KIT/platelet-derived growth factor α mutation and imatinib intolerance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included objective response rate by independent radiologic review, safety, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Overall, 453 patients were randomly assigned to ripretinib (intention-to-treat [ITT], n = 226; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 163) or sunitinib (ITT, n = 227; KIT exon 11 ITT, n = 164). Median PFS for ripretinib and sunitinib (KIT exon 11 ITT) was 8.3 and 7.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.16; P = .36); median PFS (ITT) was 8.0 and 8.3 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; nominal P = .72). Neither was statistically significant. Objective response rate was higher for ripretinib versus sunitinib in the KIT exon 11 ITT population (23.9% v 14.6%, nominal P = .03). Ripretinib was associated with a more favorable safety profile, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (41.3% v 65.6%, nominal P < .0001), and better scores on patient-reported outcome measures of tolerability. CONCLUSION: Ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of PFS. However, meaningful clinical activity, fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, and improved tolerability were observed with ripretinib. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-12-01 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9746771/ /pubmed/35947817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00294 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Reports
Bauer, Sebastian
Jones, Robin L.
Blay, Jean-Yves
Gelderblom, Hans
George, Suzanne
Schöffski, Patrick
von Mehren, Margaret
Zalcberg, John R.
Kang, Yoon-Koo
Razak, Albiruni Abdul
Trent, Jonathan
Attia, Steven
Le Cesne, Axel
Su, Ying
Meade, Julie
Wang, Tao
Sherman, Matthew L.
Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo
Heinrich, Michael C.
Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
title Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
title_full Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
title_fullStr Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
title_full_unstemmed Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
title_short Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
title_sort ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after treatment with imatinib (intrigue): a randomized, open-label, phase iii trial
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00294
work_keys_str_mv AT bauersebastian ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT jonesrobinl ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT blayjeanyves ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT gelderblomhans ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT georgesuzanne ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT schoffskipatrick ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT vonmehrenmargaret ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT zalcbergjohnr ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT kangyoonkoo ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT razakalbiruniabdul ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT trentjonathan ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT attiasteven ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT lecesneaxel ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT suying ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT meadejulie ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT wangtao ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT shermanmatthewl ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT ruizsotorodrigo ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial
AT heinrichmichaelc ripretinibversussunitinibinpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalstromaltumoraftertreatmentwithimatinibintriguearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrial