Cargando…
Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis
High levels of occupational sitting is an emerging health concern. As working from home has become a common practice as a result of COVID-19, it is imperative to validate an appropriate self-report measure to assess sitting in this setting. This secondary analysis study aimed to validate the occupat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103551 |
_version_ | 1784849472516259840 |
---|---|
author | Dillon, Kirsten Hiemstra, Madison Mitchell, Marc Bartmann, Nina Rollo, Scott Gardiner, Paul A. Prapavessis, Harry |
author_facet | Dillon, Kirsten Hiemstra, Madison Mitchell, Marc Bartmann, Nina Rollo, Scott Gardiner, Paul A. Prapavessis, Harry |
author_sort | Dillon, Kirsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | High levels of occupational sitting is an emerging health concern. As working from home has become a common practice as a result of COVID-19, it is imperative to validate an appropriate self-report measure to assess sitting in this setting. This secondary analysis study aimed to validate the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) against an activPAL4™ in full-time home-based ‘office’ workers (n = 148; mean age = 44.90). Participants completed a modified version of the OSPAQ and wore an activPAL4™ for a full work week. The findings suggest that the modified OSPAQ has fair levels of validity in terms of correlation for sitting and standing (ρ = 0.35–0.43, all p < 0.05) and agreement (bias = 2–12%) at the group level; however, estimates were poor at an individual level, as suggested by wide limits of agreement (±22–30%). Overall, the OSPAQ showed to be an easily administered and valid questionnaire to measure group level sitting and standing in this sample of adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9746924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97469242022-12-14 Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis Dillon, Kirsten Hiemstra, Madison Mitchell, Marc Bartmann, Nina Rollo, Scott Gardiner, Paul A. Prapavessis, Harry Appl Ergon Article High levels of occupational sitting is an emerging health concern. As working from home has become a common practice as a result of COVID-19, it is imperative to validate an appropriate self-report measure to assess sitting in this setting. This secondary analysis study aimed to validate the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) against an activPAL4™ in full-time home-based ‘office’ workers (n = 148; mean age = 44.90). Participants completed a modified version of the OSPAQ and wore an activPAL4™ for a full work week. The findings suggest that the modified OSPAQ has fair levels of validity in terms of correlation for sitting and standing (ρ = 0.35–0.43, all p < 0.05) and agreement (bias = 2–12%) at the group level; however, estimates were poor at an individual level, as suggested by wide limits of agreement (±22–30%). Overall, the OSPAQ showed to be an easily administered and valid questionnaire to measure group level sitting and standing in this sample of adults. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9746924/ /pubmed/34403840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103551 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Dillon, Kirsten Hiemstra, Madison Mitchell, Marc Bartmann, Nina Rollo, Scott Gardiner, Paul A. Prapavessis, Harry Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis |
title | Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis |
title_full | Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis |
title_fullStr | Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis |
title_short | Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis |
title_sort | validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (ospaq) for home-based office workers during the covid-19 global pandemic: a secondary analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9746924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dillonkirsten validityoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqforhomebasedofficeworkersduringthecovid19globalpandemicasecondaryanalysis AT hiemstramadison validityoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqforhomebasedofficeworkersduringthecovid19globalpandemicasecondaryanalysis AT mitchellmarc validityoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqforhomebasedofficeworkersduringthecovid19globalpandemicasecondaryanalysis AT bartmannnina validityoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqforhomebasedofficeworkersduringthecovid19globalpandemicasecondaryanalysis AT rolloscott validityoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqforhomebasedofficeworkersduringthecovid19globalpandemicasecondaryanalysis AT gardinerpaula validityoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqforhomebasedofficeworkersduringthecovid19globalpandemicasecondaryanalysis AT prapavessisharry validityoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqforhomebasedofficeworkersduringthecovid19globalpandemicasecondaryanalysis |