Cargando…

Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screws (PSs) or lateral mass screws (LMSs) are used in posterior cervical spine fixation. The former are more firmly fixed but are associated with the risk of neurovascular injury and should be inserted using intraoperative imaging or navigation, which may prolong the surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inoue, Daisuke, Shigematsu, Hideki, Matsumori, Hiroaki, Ueda, Yurito, Tanaka, Yasuhito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561156
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0055
_version_ 1784849545767682048
author Inoue, Daisuke
Shigematsu, Hideki
Matsumori, Hiroaki
Ueda, Yurito
Tanaka, Yasuhito
author_facet Inoue, Daisuke
Shigematsu, Hideki
Matsumori, Hiroaki
Ueda, Yurito
Tanaka, Yasuhito
author_sort Inoue, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screws (PSs) or lateral mass screws (LMSs) are used in posterior cervical spine fixation. The former are more firmly fixed but are associated with the risk of neurovascular injury and should be inserted using intraoperative imaging or navigation, which may prolong the surgical duration and is not feasible in all hospitals. This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of LMS insertions without fluoroscopic guidance and screw loosening rates at 6 months postoperatively using computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We examined 38 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion using 206 LMSs in the C3-C6 range between January 2018 and July 2021. The direction of screw insertion followed the Magerl method, and we inserted screws as bicortically as possible without intraoperative imaging. The screw position was examined using CT at 1 week postoperatively. Screw insertion angles, bicortical insertion rate, facet violation, and neurovascular injury were evaluated. Screw loosening with unicortical and bicortical screws (US and BS, respectively) was investigated using CT at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The average LMS length was 14.1 mm. The average axial and sagittal angles were 33.9° and 29.2°, respectively. Among the 206 LMSs inserted, 167 were BS; of these, 94.6% had screw length protrusion of 0-2 mm. Facet violation was observed in 3.4% of all screws but without neurovascular injury. Six months postoperatively, loosening of 25 screws (12.1%) occurred, including 17 (18.3%) USs and 8 (8.39%) BSs. The screw loosening rate was significantly higher in US than for BS (43.6% [17/39] vs. 4.8% [8/167], P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Over 80% of LMSs were inserted bicortically without intraoperative imaging. By devising the screw length selection process, we inserted for screw loosening was more common in US and more likely at the fixed end.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9747216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97472162022-12-21 Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography Inoue, Daisuke Shigematsu, Hideki Matsumori, Hiroaki Ueda, Yurito Tanaka, Yasuhito Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screws (PSs) or lateral mass screws (LMSs) are used in posterior cervical spine fixation. The former are more firmly fixed but are associated with the risk of neurovascular injury and should be inserted using intraoperative imaging or navigation, which may prolong the surgical duration and is not feasible in all hospitals. This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of LMS insertions without fluoroscopic guidance and screw loosening rates at 6 months postoperatively using computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We examined 38 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion using 206 LMSs in the C3-C6 range between January 2018 and July 2021. The direction of screw insertion followed the Magerl method, and we inserted screws as bicortically as possible without intraoperative imaging. The screw position was examined using CT at 1 week postoperatively. Screw insertion angles, bicortical insertion rate, facet violation, and neurovascular injury were evaluated. Screw loosening with unicortical and bicortical screws (US and BS, respectively) was investigated using CT at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The average LMS length was 14.1 mm. The average axial and sagittal angles were 33.9° and 29.2°, respectively. Among the 206 LMSs inserted, 167 were BS; of these, 94.6% had screw length protrusion of 0-2 mm. Facet violation was observed in 3.4% of all screws but without neurovascular injury. Six months postoperatively, loosening of 25 screws (12.1%) occurred, including 17 (18.3%) USs and 8 (8.39%) BSs. The screw loosening rate was significantly higher in US than for BS (43.6% [17/39] vs. 4.8% [8/167], P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Over 80% of LMSs were inserted bicortically without intraoperative imaging. By devising the screw length selection process, we inserted for screw loosening was more common in US and more likely at the fixed end. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9747216/ /pubmed/36561156 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0055 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Inoue, Daisuke
Shigematsu, Hideki
Matsumori, Hiroaki
Ueda, Yurito
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography
title Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography
title_full Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography
title_short Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography
title_sort accuracy of lateral mass screw insertion during cervical spine surgery without fluoroscopic guidance and comparison of postoperative screw loosening rate among unicortical and bicortical screws using computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561156
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0055
work_keys_str_mv AT inouedaisuke accuracyoflateralmassscrewinsertionduringcervicalspinesurgerywithoutfluoroscopicguidanceandcomparisonofpostoperativescrewlooseningrateamongunicorticalandbicorticalscrewsusingcomputedtomography
AT shigematsuhideki accuracyoflateralmassscrewinsertionduringcervicalspinesurgerywithoutfluoroscopicguidanceandcomparisonofpostoperativescrewlooseningrateamongunicorticalandbicorticalscrewsusingcomputedtomography
AT matsumorihiroaki accuracyoflateralmassscrewinsertionduringcervicalspinesurgerywithoutfluoroscopicguidanceandcomparisonofpostoperativescrewlooseningrateamongunicorticalandbicorticalscrewsusingcomputedtomography
AT uedayurito accuracyoflateralmassscrewinsertionduringcervicalspinesurgerywithoutfluoroscopicguidanceandcomparisonofpostoperativescrewlooseningrateamongunicorticalandbicorticalscrewsusingcomputedtomography
AT tanakayasuhito accuracyoflateralmassscrewinsertionduringcervicalspinesurgerywithoutfluoroscopicguidanceandcomparisonofpostoperativescrewlooseningrateamongunicorticalandbicorticalscrewsusingcomputedtomography