Cargando…
Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus
Assessment Tools have become the de facto method to address sustainability issues within the built environment. They provide a measurable third-party approach to ensuring sustainability design and directives are met through the use of indictors, criteria’s and credit system. A key challenge is that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36531629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11864 |
_version_ | 1784849636383522816 |
---|---|
author | Dawodu, Ayotunde Dai, Haoyue Zou, Tong Zhou, Hongjie Lian, Wenhan Oladejo, Jumoke Osebor, Felix |
author_facet | Dawodu, Ayotunde Dai, Haoyue Zou, Tong Zhou, Hongjie Lian, Wenhan Oladejo, Jumoke Osebor, Felix |
author_sort | Dawodu, Ayotunde |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assessment Tools have become the de facto method to address sustainability issues within the built environment. They provide a measurable third-party approach to ensuring sustainability design and directives are met through the use of indictors, criteria’s and credit system. A key challenge is that the existing tools such as BREEAM Communities and LEED Neighbourhood Development address a wider community but cannot efficiently address the more nuanced and context specific sustainability requirements of campuses. However, the approach of utilizing credits, indicator and criteria systems is a tactic that campus planners have slowly began to imbibe. This is even more critical to sustainable development cities due to the huge amounts of land and human resources consumed on campuses; However, gaps exist within the currently existing Campus Sustainability Assessment Tools (CSAT) that have been developed. Generally. Though studies have identified trends and gaps in neighbourhood and building assessment tools, no comprehensive study has investigated the potential gaps from the newly emerging CSATs. Using bibliometric analysis, this study reviews over 1000 articles on campus sustainability and assessment tools with the aim of determining the gaps, trends and focus area of campus sustainability via CSAT. The result draw out 15 dimensions that govern the design of sustainable campuses, and the most predominant dimensions were environmental, educational and governance dimension. The results also highlight the importance of context in implementing and developing CSATs and showed numerous overlooked campus sustainability issues, which have considerable impact on the determining the claims that makes campuses sustainable. Finally, results demonstrated a need to enhance inclusivity in decision making on campus via different survey techniques in both education and implementation of campus sustainability initiatives. In sum this study enhances the development of new CSAT and campus sustainability initiative and the modification existing initiatives to effectively meet the required sustainability standards within the built environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9747594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97475942022-12-15 Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus Dawodu, Ayotunde Dai, Haoyue Zou, Tong Zhou, Hongjie Lian, Wenhan Oladejo, Jumoke Osebor, Felix Heliyon Review Article Assessment Tools have become the de facto method to address sustainability issues within the built environment. They provide a measurable third-party approach to ensuring sustainability design and directives are met through the use of indictors, criteria’s and credit system. A key challenge is that the existing tools such as BREEAM Communities and LEED Neighbourhood Development address a wider community but cannot efficiently address the more nuanced and context specific sustainability requirements of campuses. However, the approach of utilizing credits, indicator and criteria systems is a tactic that campus planners have slowly began to imbibe. This is even more critical to sustainable development cities due to the huge amounts of land and human resources consumed on campuses; However, gaps exist within the currently existing Campus Sustainability Assessment Tools (CSAT) that have been developed. Generally. Though studies have identified trends and gaps in neighbourhood and building assessment tools, no comprehensive study has investigated the potential gaps from the newly emerging CSATs. Using bibliometric analysis, this study reviews over 1000 articles on campus sustainability and assessment tools with the aim of determining the gaps, trends and focus area of campus sustainability via CSAT. The result draw out 15 dimensions that govern the design of sustainable campuses, and the most predominant dimensions were environmental, educational and governance dimension. The results also highlight the importance of context in implementing and developing CSATs and showed numerous overlooked campus sustainability issues, which have considerable impact on the determining the claims that makes campuses sustainable. Finally, results demonstrated a need to enhance inclusivity in decision making on campus via different survey techniques in both education and implementation of campus sustainability initiatives. In sum this study enhances the development of new CSAT and campus sustainability initiative and the modification existing initiatives to effectively meet the required sustainability standards within the built environment. Elsevier 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9747594/ /pubmed/36531629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11864 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Dawodu, Ayotunde Dai, Haoyue Zou, Tong Zhou, Hongjie Lian, Wenhan Oladejo, Jumoke Osebor, Felix Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus |
title | Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus |
title_full | Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus |
title_fullStr | Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus |
title_full_unstemmed | Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus |
title_short | Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus |
title_sort | campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36531629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dawoduayotunde campussustainabilityresearchindicatorsanddimensionstoconsiderforthedesignandassessmentofasustainablecampus AT daihaoyue campussustainabilityresearchindicatorsanddimensionstoconsiderforthedesignandassessmentofasustainablecampus AT zoutong campussustainabilityresearchindicatorsanddimensionstoconsiderforthedesignandassessmentofasustainablecampus AT zhouhongjie campussustainabilityresearchindicatorsanddimensionstoconsiderforthedesignandassessmentofasustainablecampus AT lianwenhan campussustainabilityresearchindicatorsanddimensionstoconsiderforthedesignandassessmentofasustainablecampus AT oladejojumoke campussustainabilityresearchindicatorsanddimensionstoconsiderforthedesignandassessmentofasustainablecampus AT oseborfelix campussustainabilityresearchindicatorsanddimensionstoconsiderforthedesignandassessmentofasustainablecampus |