Cargando…

The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study

Widely endorsed screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC) include structural visualization (e.g. colonoscopy) and stool-based tests including multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), or high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT). However, CRC scre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann, Limburg, Paul, Helmueller, Leah, João Janeiro, Maria, Hartlaub, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36531100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102045
_version_ 1784849651129647104
author Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann
Limburg, Paul
Helmueller, Leah
João Janeiro, Maria
Hartlaub, Paul
author_facet Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann
Limburg, Paul
Helmueller, Leah
João Janeiro, Maria
Hartlaub, Paul
author_sort Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann
collection PubMed
description Widely endorsed screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC) include structural visualization (e.g. colonoscopy) and stool-based tests including multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), or high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT). However, CRC screenings are underutilized, hence understanding the screening utilization trends is important, particularly with respect to the newest guideline-endorsed option (mt-sDNA). The objective of this study was to assess patterns in overall CRC screenings following clinical availability of the mt-sDNA test among average-risk individuals in the Ascension Wisconsin healthcare system focusing primarily on individuals aged 50–75 years old. We also reported CRC screening behaviors among individuals < 50 and > 75 years old. Electronic medical records of individuals aged ≥ 40 years from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed to identify average-risk and screen-eligible members. For those with screening data available, we determined the proportion who were up-to-date with any United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening strategy; the number of screening tests performed in the measurement year; and the distribution of screening modalities. Temporal trends were assessed using regression analysis, including subgroup analyses across age groups and screening modalities. A total of 172,045 unique patients aged ≥ 40 years were included, of which 115,708 individuals aged 50–75 years. When considering all individuals up-to-date and screened in the measurement year, overall adherence increased significantly over the 4-year study period, from 39,105 to 49,698 patients or 47 % to 59 % (p < 0.0001). The screening incidence between 2015 and 2018 increased from 19.44 to 23.66 tests per 1,000 persons for gFOBT and FIT, a 1.2-fold increase, and from 6.54 to 29.78 tests per 1,000 persons for mt-sDNA (p < 0.05), a 4.6-fold increase. During the same time period, the screening incidence of colonoscopy decreased from 119.99 to 110.58 tests per 1,000 persons, corresponding to a decrease of 8 %. Similar patterns in screening incidence rates were observed among those aged < 50 and > 75 years old. Growing adoption, higher preference, and the broad availability of mt-sDNA testing may be associated with an increase in overall CRC screening rates in the average-risk population, in parallel with a slight increase in the use of other non-invasive CRC screening tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9747652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97476522022-12-15 The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann Limburg, Paul Helmueller, Leah João Janeiro, Maria Hartlaub, Paul Prev Med Rep Regular Article Widely endorsed screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC) include structural visualization (e.g. colonoscopy) and stool-based tests including multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), or high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT). However, CRC screenings are underutilized, hence understanding the screening utilization trends is important, particularly with respect to the newest guideline-endorsed option (mt-sDNA). The objective of this study was to assess patterns in overall CRC screenings following clinical availability of the mt-sDNA test among average-risk individuals in the Ascension Wisconsin healthcare system focusing primarily on individuals aged 50–75 years old. We also reported CRC screening behaviors among individuals < 50 and > 75 years old. Electronic medical records of individuals aged ≥ 40 years from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed to identify average-risk and screen-eligible members. For those with screening data available, we determined the proportion who were up-to-date with any United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening strategy; the number of screening tests performed in the measurement year; and the distribution of screening modalities. Temporal trends were assessed using regression analysis, including subgroup analyses across age groups and screening modalities. A total of 172,045 unique patients aged ≥ 40 years were included, of which 115,708 individuals aged 50–75 years. When considering all individuals up-to-date and screened in the measurement year, overall adherence increased significantly over the 4-year study period, from 39,105 to 49,698 patients or 47 % to 59 % (p < 0.0001). The screening incidence between 2015 and 2018 increased from 19.44 to 23.66 tests per 1,000 persons for gFOBT and FIT, a 1.2-fold increase, and from 6.54 to 29.78 tests per 1,000 persons for mt-sDNA (p < 0.05), a 4.6-fold increase. During the same time period, the screening incidence of colonoscopy decreased from 119.99 to 110.58 tests per 1,000 persons, corresponding to a decrease of 8 %. Similar patterns in screening incidence rates were observed among those aged < 50 and > 75 years old. Growing adoption, higher preference, and the broad availability of mt-sDNA testing may be associated with an increase in overall CRC screening rates in the average-risk population, in parallel with a slight increase in the use of other non-invasive CRC screening tests. 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9747652/ /pubmed/36531100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102045 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann
Limburg, Paul
Helmueller, Leah
João Janeiro, Maria
Hartlaub, Paul
The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study
title The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study
title_full The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study
title_fullStr The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study
title_short The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study
title_sort impact of multi-target stool dna testing in clinical practice in the united states: a real-world evidence retrospective study
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36531100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102045
work_keys_str_mv AT millerwilsonlesleyann theimpactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT limburgpaul theimpactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT helmuellerleah theimpactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT joaojaneiromaria theimpactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT hartlaubpaul theimpactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT millerwilsonlesleyann impactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT limburgpaul impactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT helmuellerleah impactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT joaojaneiromaria impactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy
AT hartlaubpaul impactofmultitargetstooldnatestinginclinicalpracticeintheunitedstatesarealworldevidenceretrospectivestudy