Cargando…
Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment
Maximum diameter and volume of the tumour provide important clinical information and are decision-making parameters for patients suspected with prostate cancer (PCa). The objectives of this study were to develop an automated method for 3D tumour measurement and compare it with the radiologist’s manu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26065-6 |
_version_ | 1784849734064668672 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Dharmesh Das, Chandan J. Kumar, Virendra Singh, Anup Mehndiratta, Amit |
author_facet | Singh, Dharmesh Das, Chandan J. Kumar, Virendra Singh, Anup Mehndiratta, Amit |
author_sort | Singh, Dharmesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Maximum diameter and volume of the tumour provide important clinical information and are decision-making parameters for patients suspected with prostate cancer (PCa). The objectives of this study were to develop an automated method for 3D tumour measurement and compare it with the radiologist’s manual assessment, as well as to investigate the impact of 3D tumour measurement on Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version-2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) scoring of prostate cancer. Tumour maximum diameter and volume were calculated using automated ellipsoid-fit method. For all PI-RADS scores, mean ± standard deviation range of tumour maximum diameter and volume measured using ellipsoid-fit method were 1.36 ± 0.28 to 1.97 ± 0.67 cm and 0.49 ± 0.31 to 1.05 ± 0.78 cc and manual assessment were in range of 0.73 ± 0.12 to 1.14 ± 0.25 cm and 0.36 ± 0.21 to 0.93 ± 0.39 cc, respectively. Ellipsoid-fit method showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher values for maximum diameter and volume than manual assessment. 3D measurement of tumour using ellipsoid-fit method was found to have higher maximum diameter and volume values (in 40–61% patients) compared to conventional assessment by radiologist, which may have an impact on PI-RADS v2.1 scoring system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9748032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97480322022-12-15 Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment Singh, Dharmesh Das, Chandan J. Kumar, Virendra Singh, Anup Mehndiratta, Amit Sci Rep Article Maximum diameter and volume of the tumour provide important clinical information and are decision-making parameters for patients suspected with prostate cancer (PCa). The objectives of this study were to develop an automated method for 3D tumour measurement and compare it with the radiologist’s manual assessment, as well as to investigate the impact of 3D tumour measurement on Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version-2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) scoring of prostate cancer. Tumour maximum diameter and volume were calculated using automated ellipsoid-fit method. For all PI-RADS scores, mean ± standard deviation range of tumour maximum diameter and volume measured using ellipsoid-fit method were 1.36 ± 0.28 to 1.97 ± 0.67 cm and 0.49 ± 0.31 to 1.05 ± 0.78 cc and manual assessment were in range of 0.73 ± 0.12 to 1.14 ± 0.25 cm and 0.36 ± 0.21 to 0.93 ± 0.39 cc, respectively. Ellipsoid-fit method showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher values for maximum diameter and volume than manual assessment. 3D measurement of tumour using ellipsoid-fit method was found to have higher maximum diameter and volume values (in 40–61% patients) compared to conventional assessment by radiologist, which may have an impact on PI-RADS v2.1 scoring system. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9748032/ /pubmed/36513800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26065-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Singh, Dharmesh Das, Chandan J. Kumar, Virendra Singh, Anup Mehndiratta, Amit Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment |
title | Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment |
title_full | Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment |
title_fullStr | Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment |
title_short | Quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from MR images using 3D ellipsoid model and its impact on PI-RADS v2.1 assessment |
title_sort | quantification of prostate tumour diameter and volume from mr images using 3d ellipsoid model and its impact on pi-rads v2.1 assessment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26065-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhdharmesh quantificationofprostatetumourdiameterandvolumefrommrimagesusing3dellipsoidmodelanditsimpactonpiradsv21assessment AT daschandanj quantificationofprostatetumourdiameterandvolumefrommrimagesusing3dellipsoidmodelanditsimpactonpiradsv21assessment AT kumarvirendra quantificationofprostatetumourdiameterandvolumefrommrimagesusing3dellipsoidmodelanditsimpactonpiradsv21assessment AT singhanup quantificationofprostatetumourdiameterandvolumefrommrimagesusing3dellipsoidmodelanditsimpactonpiradsv21assessment AT mehndirattaamit quantificationofprostatetumourdiameterandvolumefrommrimagesusing3dellipsoidmodelanditsimpactonpiradsv21assessment |