Cargando…
Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nagoya University
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544604 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.84.4.772 |
_version_ | 1784849799028146176 |
---|---|
author | Takamoto, Naohiro Takazawa, Shinya Yoshida, Yuki Sasaki, Tamotsu Nishi, Akira |
author_facet | Takamoto, Naohiro Takazawa, Shinya Yoshida, Yuki Sasaki, Tamotsu Nishi, Akira |
author_sort | Takamoto, Naohiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in length of time of NJT placement and dosage of radiation exposure using a portable imaging device with FPD versus fluoroscopy. Pediatric patients who underwent NJT placement between April 2016 and December 2018 were identified retrospectively from the clinical records. The age, sex, body weight, and height of each child at the time of the procedure as well as the procedure time, outcomes of the procedure, and dosage of radiation exposure was compared between the two groups. In 76 cases of NJT placement (41 patients), there was no significant difference in the success rate of NJT placement between the FPD (90%) and fluoroscopy groups (95%). However, the NJT placement time was significantly longer in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (488 s vs 291 s). According to our calculations, the radiation dosage was lower in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (136 μGy per procedure vs 2819 μGy per procedure). These results suggest that NJT placement using a portable imaging device with an FPD can be an effective method for children who are difficult to transport with an equal success rate and lower dosage of radiation exposure compared with conventional fluoroscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9748318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nagoya University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97483182022-12-20 Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector Takamoto, Naohiro Takazawa, Shinya Yoshida, Yuki Sasaki, Tamotsu Nishi, Akira Nagoya J Med Sci Original Paper Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in length of time of NJT placement and dosage of radiation exposure using a portable imaging device with FPD versus fluoroscopy. Pediatric patients who underwent NJT placement between April 2016 and December 2018 were identified retrospectively from the clinical records. The age, sex, body weight, and height of each child at the time of the procedure as well as the procedure time, outcomes of the procedure, and dosage of radiation exposure was compared between the two groups. In 76 cases of NJT placement (41 patients), there was no significant difference in the success rate of NJT placement between the FPD (90%) and fluoroscopy groups (95%). However, the NJT placement time was significantly longer in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (488 s vs 291 s). According to our calculations, the radiation dosage was lower in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (136 μGy per procedure vs 2819 μGy per procedure). These results suggest that NJT placement using a portable imaging device with an FPD can be an effective method for children who are difficult to transport with an equal success rate and lower dosage of radiation exposure compared with conventional fluoroscopy. Nagoya University 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9748318/ /pubmed/36544604 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.84.4.772 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Takamoto, Naohiro Takazawa, Shinya Yoshida, Yuki Sasaki, Tamotsu Nishi, Akira Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector |
title | Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector |
title_full | Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector |
title_fullStr | Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector |
title_full_unstemmed | Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector |
title_short | Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector |
title_sort | examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544604 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.84.4.772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takamotonaohiro examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector AT takazawashinya examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector AT yoshidayuki examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector AT sasakitamotsu examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector AT nishiakira examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector |