Cargando…

Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector

Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takamoto, Naohiro, Takazawa, Shinya, Yoshida, Yuki, Sasaki, Tamotsu, Nishi, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nagoya University 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544604
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.84.4.772
_version_ 1784849799028146176
author Takamoto, Naohiro
Takazawa, Shinya
Yoshida, Yuki
Sasaki, Tamotsu
Nishi, Akira
author_facet Takamoto, Naohiro
Takazawa, Shinya
Yoshida, Yuki
Sasaki, Tamotsu
Nishi, Akira
author_sort Takamoto, Naohiro
collection PubMed
description Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in length of time of NJT placement and dosage of radiation exposure using a portable imaging device with FPD versus fluoroscopy. Pediatric patients who underwent NJT placement between April 2016 and December 2018 were identified retrospectively from the clinical records. The age, sex, body weight, and height of each child at the time of the procedure as well as the procedure time, outcomes of the procedure, and dosage of radiation exposure was compared between the two groups. In 76 cases of NJT placement (41 patients), there was no significant difference in the success rate of NJT placement between the FPD (90%) and fluoroscopy groups (95%). However, the NJT placement time was significantly longer in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (488 s vs 291 s). According to our calculations, the radiation dosage was lower in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (136 μGy per procedure vs 2819 μGy per procedure). These results suggest that NJT placement using a portable imaging device with an FPD can be an effective method for children who are difficult to transport with an equal success rate and lower dosage of radiation exposure compared with conventional fluoroscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9748318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nagoya University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97483182022-12-20 Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector Takamoto, Naohiro Takazawa, Shinya Yoshida, Yuki Sasaki, Tamotsu Nishi, Akira Nagoya J Med Sci Original Paper Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in length of time of NJT placement and dosage of radiation exposure using a portable imaging device with FPD versus fluoroscopy. Pediatric patients who underwent NJT placement between April 2016 and December 2018 were identified retrospectively from the clinical records. The age, sex, body weight, and height of each child at the time of the procedure as well as the procedure time, outcomes of the procedure, and dosage of radiation exposure was compared between the two groups. In 76 cases of NJT placement (41 patients), there was no significant difference in the success rate of NJT placement between the FPD (90%) and fluoroscopy groups (95%). However, the NJT placement time was significantly longer in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (488 s vs 291 s). According to our calculations, the radiation dosage was lower in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (136 μGy per procedure vs 2819 μGy per procedure). These results suggest that NJT placement using a portable imaging device with an FPD can be an effective method for children who are difficult to transport with an equal success rate and lower dosage of radiation exposure compared with conventional fluoroscopy. Nagoya University 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9748318/ /pubmed/36544604 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.84.4.772 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Takamoto, Naohiro
Takazawa, Shinya
Yoshida, Yuki
Sasaki, Tamotsu
Nishi, Akira
Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
title Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
title_full Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
title_fullStr Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
title_full_unstemmed Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
title_short Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
title_sort examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544604
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.84.4.772
work_keys_str_mv AT takamotonaohiro examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector
AT takazawashinya examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector
AT yoshidayuki examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector
AT sasakitamotsu examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector
AT nishiakira examinationoftheeffectivenessofbedsidenasojejunaltubeplacementusingaportableimagingdevicewithaflatpaneldetector