Cargando…

Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey

OBJECTIVES: To quantify and characterise non-household contact and to identify the effect of shielding and isolating on contact patterns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Anyone living in the UK was eligible to take part in the study. We recorded 5143 responses to the online...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bridgen, Jessica RE, Jewell, Chris, Read, Jonathan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059231
_version_ 1784849840972234752
author Bridgen, Jessica RE
Jewell, Chris
Read, Jonathan M
author_facet Bridgen, Jessica RE
Jewell, Chris
Read, Jonathan M
author_sort Bridgen, Jessica RE
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To quantify and characterise non-household contact and to identify the effect of shielding and isolating on contact patterns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Anyone living in the UK was eligible to take part in the study. We recorded 5143 responses to the online questionnaire between 28 July 2020 and 14 August 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was the daily non-household contact rate of participants. Secondary outcomes were propensity to leave home over a 7 day period, whether contacts had occurred indoors or outdoors locations visited, the furthest distance travelled from home, ability to socially distance and membership of support bubble. RESULTS: The mean rate of non-household contacts per person was 2.9 d(-1). Participants attending a workplace (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 3.33, 95% CI 3.02 to 3.66), self-employed (aIRR 1.63, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.87) or working in healthcare (aIRR 5.10, 95% CI 4.29 to 6.10) reported significantly higher non-household contact rates than those working from home. Participants self-isolating as a precaution or following Test and Trace instructions had a lower non-household contact rate than those not self-isolating (aIRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79). We found limited evidence that those shielding had reduced non-household contacts compared with non-shielders. CONCLUSION: The daily rate of non-household interactions remained lower than prepandemic levels measured by other studies, suggesting continued adherence to social distancing guidelines. Individuals attending a workplace in-person or employed as healthcare professionals were less likely to maintain social distance and had a higher non-household contact rate, possibly increasing their infection risk. Shielding and self-isolating individuals required greater support to enable them to follow the government guidelines and reduce non-household contact and therefore their risk of infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9748508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97485082022-12-14 Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey Bridgen, Jessica RE Jewell, Chris Read, Jonathan M BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To quantify and characterise non-household contact and to identify the effect of shielding and isolating on contact patterns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Anyone living in the UK was eligible to take part in the study. We recorded 5143 responses to the online questionnaire between 28 July 2020 and 14 August 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was the daily non-household contact rate of participants. Secondary outcomes were propensity to leave home over a 7 day period, whether contacts had occurred indoors or outdoors locations visited, the furthest distance travelled from home, ability to socially distance and membership of support bubble. RESULTS: The mean rate of non-household contacts per person was 2.9 d(-1). Participants attending a workplace (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 3.33, 95% CI 3.02 to 3.66), self-employed (aIRR 1.63, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.87) or working in healthcare (aIRR 5.10, 95% CI 4.29 to 6.10) reported significantly higher non-household contact rates than those working from home. Participants self-isolating as a precaution or following Test and Trace instructions had a lower non-household contact rate than those not self-isolating (aIRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79). We found limited evidence that those shielding had reduced non-household contacts compared with non-shielders. CONCLUSION: The daily rate of non-household interactions remained lower than prepandemic levels measured by other studies, suggesting continued adherence to social distancing guidelines. Individuals attending a workplace in-person or employed as healthcare professionals were less likely to maintain social distance and had a higher non-household contact rate, possibly increasing their infection risk. Shielding and self-isolating individuals required greater support to enable them to follow the government guidelines and reduce non-household contact and therefore their risk of infection. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9748508/ /pubmed/36523221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059231 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Bridgen, Jessica RE
Jewell, Chris
Read, Jonathan M
Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey
title Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey
title_full Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey
title_fullStr Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey
title_full_unstemmed Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey
title_short Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross-sectional online survey
title_sort social mixing patterns in the uk following the relaxation of covid-19 pandemic restrictions, july–august 2020: a cross-sectional online survey
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059231
work_keys_str_mv AT bridgenjessicare socialmixingpatternsintheukfollowingtherelaxationofcovid19pandemicrestrictionsjulyaugust2020acrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT jewellchris socialmixingpatternsintheukfollowingtherelaxationofcovid19pandemicrestrictionsjulyaugust2020acrosssectionalonlinesurvey
AT readjonathanm socialmixingpatternsintheukfollowingtherelaxationofcovid19pandemicrestrictionsjulyaugust2020acrosssectionalonlinesurvey