Cargando…

The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) effectively discriminates between MCI and dementia within the clinical spectrum of neurochemically confirmed Alzheimer’s disease

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at testing the ability of the frontal assessment battery (FAB) to differentiate between patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as well as comparing its discriminative power to that of the Mini-Mental State Examination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aiello, Edoardo Nicolò, Verde, Federico, Milone, Ilaria, Giacopuzzi Grigoli, Eleonora, Dubini, Antonella, Carelli, Laura, Ferrucci, Roberta, Priori, Alberto, Ratti, Antonia, Torresani, Erminio, Ticozzi, Nicola, Silani, Vincenzo, Poletti, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054321
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed at testing the ability of the frontal assessment battery (FAB) to differentiate between patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as well as comparing its discriminative power to that of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). METHODS: The present retrospective cohort included N = 107 Aβ-positive patients diagnosed with either MCI due to AD (N = 40) or probable AD dementia (ADD; N = 67). A two-step multiple logistic regression (MLR) was run to predict an MCI vs. ADD diagnosis based on FAB scores. Within the baseline step, demographics, disease duration, MMSE scores, and information on cognitive phenotypes were entered, with the FAB being added within the second step. Receiver-operating characteristics analyses were also run to derive intrinsic and post-test diagnostics. RESULTS: Within the baseline MLR step, only lower MMSE scores predicted the occurrence of ADD; by adding the FAB, which likewise was able to discriminate between MCI and ADD (p = 0.016), a significant increase in model fit was detected (p = 0.007). The diagnostic efficiency of the FAB (AUC = 0.85) was comparable (p = 0.583) to that of the MMSE (AUC = 0.82), also yielding good intrinsic and post-test diagnostics, which were comparable to those of the MMSE. DISCUSSION: The FAB is a diagnostically sound screener to discriminate between MCI and ADD, independently of patients’ overall cognitive profile. In doing so, the FAB is comparable to the MMSE, and the complementation of the latter with the former is advisable in order to increase the accuracy in differentiating between MCI and ADD within screening sessions.