Cargando…
Reply to: Higher PEEP in intubated COVID-19-associated ARDS patients? We are not sure
Autores principales: | Somhorst, Peter, van der Zee, Philip, Endeman, Henrik, Gommers, Diederik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04262-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to van den Berg and van der Hoeven: In Patients with ARDS, Optimal PEEP Should Not Be Determined Using the Intersection of Relative Collapse and Relative Overdistention
por: van der Zee, Philip, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
PEEP-FiO(2) table versus EIT to titrate PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS
por: Somhorst, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Higher PEEP in intubated COVID-19-associated ARDS patients? We are not sure
por: Yaroshetskiy, Andrey I., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Electrical Impedance Tomography for Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration in COVID-19–related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
por: van der Zee, Philip, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Recruitment Maneuvers and Higher PEEP, the So-Called Open Lung Concept, in Patients with ARDS
por: van der Zee, Philip, et al.
Publicado: (2019)