Cargando…
Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
INTRODUCTION: Oxygen is the most common drug used in critical care patients to correct episodes of hypoxaemia. The adoption of new technologies in clinical practice, such as closed-loop systems for an automatic oxygen titration, may improve outcomes and reduce the healthcare professionals’ workload...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062299 |
_version_ | 1784849937151819776 |
---|---|
author | Mol, Caroline Gomes Vieira, Aléxia Gabriela da Silva Garcia, Bianca Maria Schneider Pereira Pereira, Emanuel dos Santos Eid, Raquel Afonso Caserta Pinto, Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Nawa, Ricardo Kenji |
author_facet | Mol, Caroline Gomes Vieira, Aléxia Gabriela da Silva Garcia, Bianca Maria Schneider Pereira Pereira, Emanuel dos Santos Eid, Raquel Afonso Caserta Pinto, Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Nawa, Ricardo Kenji |
author_sort | Mol, Caroline Gomes |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Oxygen is the most common drug used in critical care patients to correct episodes of hypoxaemia. The adoption of new technologies in clinical practice, such as closed-loop systems for an automatic oxygen titration, may improve outcomes and reduce the healthcare professionals’ workload at the bedside; however, certainty of the evidence regarding the safety and benefits still remains low. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness, efficacy and safety of the closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during the hospitalisation period by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL and LOVE evidence databases will be searched. Randomised controlled trials and cross-over studies investigating the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome) framework will be included. The primary outcomes will be the time in the peripheral oxygen saturation target. Secondary outcomes will include time for oxygen weaning time; length of stay; costs; adverse events; mortality; healthcare professionals’ workload, and percentage of time with hypoxia and hyperoxia. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data and perform quality assessment of included studies. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess risk of bias. The RevMan V.5.4 software will be used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity will be analysed using I(2) statistics. Mean difference or standardised mean difference with 95% CI and p value will be used to calculate treatment effect for outcome variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required because this systematic review and meta-analysis is based on previously published data. Final results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences and events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022306033. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9748949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97489492022-12-15 Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol Mol, Caroline Gomes Vieira, Aléxia Gabriela da Silva Garcia, Bianca Maria Schneider Pereira Pereira, Emanuel dos Santos Eid, Raquel Afonso Caserta Pinto, Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Nawa, Ricardo Kenji BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Oxygen is the most common drug used in critical care patients to correct episodes of hypoxaemia. The adoption of new technologies in clinical practice, such as closed-loop systems for an automatic oxygen titration, may improve outcomes and reduce the healthcare professionals’ workload at the bedside; however, certainty of the evidence regarding the safety and benefits still remains low. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness, efficacy and safety of the closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during the hospitalisation period by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL and LOVE evidence databases will be searched. Randomised controlled trials and cross-over studies investigating the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome) framework will be included. The primary outcomes will be the time in the peripheral oxygen saturation target. Secondary outcomes will include time for oxygen weaning time; length of stay; costs; adverse events; mortality; healthcare professionals’ workload, and percentage of time with hypoxia and hyperoxia. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data and perform quality assessment of included studies. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess risk of bias. The RevMan V.5.4 software will be used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity will be analysed using I(2) statistics. Mean difference or standardised mean difference with 95% CI and p value will be used to calculate treatment effect for outcome variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required because this systematic review and meta-analysis is based on previously published data. Final results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences and events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022306033. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9748949/ /pubmed/36523244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062299 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Mol, Caroline Gomes Vieira, Aléxia Gabriela da Silva Garcia, Bianca Maria Schneider Pereira Pereira, Emanuel dos Santos Eid, Raquel Afonso Caserta Pinto, Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Nawa, Ricardo Kenji Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title | Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_full | Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_fullStr | Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_short | Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_sort | closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molcarolinegomes closedloopoxygencontrolforpatientswithhypoxaemiaduringhospitalisationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT vieiraalexiagabrieladasilva closedloopoxygencontrolforpatientswithhypoxaemiaduringhospitalisationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT garciabiancamariaschneiderpereira closedloopoxygencontrolforpatientswithhypoxaemiaduringhospitalisationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT pereiraemanueldossantos closedloopoxygencontrolforpatientswithhypoxaemiaduringhospitalisationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT eidraquelafonsocaserta closedloopoxygencontrolforpatientswithhypoxaemiaduringhospitalisationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT pintoanacarolinapereiranunes closedloopoxygencontrolforpatientswithhypoxaemiaduringhospitalisationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT nawaricardokenji closedloopoxygencontrolforpatientswithhypoxaemiaduringhospitalisationalivingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol |