Cargando…

Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence suggests that diabetes stigma and negative emotions associated with it may impair the quality of life of people with diabetes. Among these psychological distresses, shame is considered the most distressing of all human emotional experiences and may be a condition to w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inagaki, Satoshi, Matsuda, Tomokazu, Muramae, Naokazu, Abe, Kozue, Kato, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36593661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003001
_version_ 1784849939483852800
author Inagaki, Satoshi
Matsuda, Tomokazu
Muramae, Naokazu
Abe, Kozue
Kato, Kenji
author_facet Inagaki, Satoshi
Matsuda, Tomokazu
Muramae, Naokazu
Abe, Kozue
Kato, Kenji
author_sort Inagaki, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence suggests that diabetes stigma and negative emotions associated with it may impair the quality of life of people with diabetes. Among these psychological distresses, shame is considered the most distressing of all human emotional experiences and may be a condition to which diabetes clinicians should pay attention. This epidemiological study focused on diabetes-related shame and aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetes-related shame, its factors, and its association with psychological indicators. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among people with type 2 diabetes preregistered with a research firm. The questionnaire included experience of diabetes-related shame and demographic data such as age, clinical characteristic measures such as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and psychological indicators, including the WHO Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and Problem Areas In Diabetes-5 (PAID-5). Differences in each indicator between people with diabetes who experienced shame and those who did not were analyzed with the unpaired t-test. As supplemental analysis, binomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the prevalence of diabetes-related shame. RESULTS: Of the 510 participants, 32.9% experienced diabetes-related shame and 17.5% concealed their disease from colleagues or friends. Those who had experienced diabetes-related shame showed significantly lower WHO-5 and higher PAID-5 scores (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was found in HbA1c (p=0.36). Binomial logistic regression revealed that women, young adults, those without a college degree, those with low self-efficacy, and those with a strong sense of financial burden or external pressure were at higher risk of experiencing diabetes-related shame. CONCLUSIONS: Among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetes-related shame was associated with diabetes-specific emotional distress and low psychological well-being. Further research and care development are needed to address diabetes-related shame and improve the quality of life of people with diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9748962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97489622022-12-15 Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study Inagaki, Satoshi Matsuda, Tomokazu Muramae, Naokazu Abe, Kozue Kato, Kenji BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Psychosocial Research INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence suggests that diabetes stigma and negative emotions associated with it may impair the quality of life of people with diabetes. Among these psychological distresses, shame is considered the most distressing of all human emotional experiences and may be a condition to which diabetes clinicians should pay attention. This epidemiological study focused on diabetes-related shame and aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetes-related shame, its factors, and its association with psychological indicators. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among people with type 2 diabetes preregistered with a research firm. The questionnaire included experience of diabetes-related shame and demographic data such as age, clinical characteristic measures such as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and psychological indicators, including the WHO Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and Problem Areas In Diabetes-5 (PAID-5). Differences in each indicator between people with diabetes who experienced shame and those who did not were analyzed with the unpaired t-test. As supplemental analysis, binomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the prevalence of diabetes-related shame. RESULTS: Of the 510 participants, 32.9% experienced diabetes-related shame and 17.5% concealed their disease from colleagues or friends. Those who had experienced diabetes-related shame showed significantly lower WHO-5 and higher PAID-5 scores (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was found in HbA1c (p=0.36). Binomial logistic regression revealed that women, young adults, those without a college degree, those with low self-efficacy, and those with a strong sense of financial burden or external pressure were at higher risk of experiencing diabetes-related shame. CONCLUSIONS: Among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetes-related shame was associated with diabetes-specific emotional distress and low psychological well-being. Further research and care development are needed to address diabetes-related shame and improve the quality of life of people with diabetes. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9748962/ /pubmed/36593661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003001 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Psychosocial Research
Inagaki, Satoshi
Matsuda, Tomokazu
Muramae, Naokazu
Abe, Kozue
Kato, Kenji
Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study
title Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study
title_full Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study
title_short Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study
title_sort diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study
topic Psychosocial Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36593661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003001
work_keys_str_mv AT inagakisatoshi diabetesrelatedshameamongpeoplewithtype2diabetesaninternetbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT matsudatomokazu diabetesrelatedshameamongpeoplewithtype2diabetesaninternetbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT muramaenaokazu diabetesrelatedshameamongpeoplewithtype2diabetesaninternetbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT abekozue diabetesrelatedshameamongpeoplewithtype2diabetesaninternetbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT katokenji diabetesrelatedshameamongpeoplewithtype2diabetesaninternetbasedcrosssectionalstudy