Cargando…

Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices

BACKGROUND: Ambulation devices may differ in their utility, muscle activation patterns, and how they affect regional blood flow. This study aimed to evaluate popliteal blood flow and vessel dimensions in response to ambulation with a hands-free crutch (HFC), axillary crutches (AC), a medical kneelin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, Adam P., Roehl, Alexis S., McGrath, Ryan, Smith, Joseph, Hackney, Kyle J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114221142784
_version_ 1784849959302987776
author Bradley, Adam P.
Roehl, Alexis S.
McGrath, Ryan
Smith, Joseph
Hackney, Kyle J.
author_facet Bradley, Adam P.
Roehl, Alexis S.
McGrath, Ryan
Smith, Joseph
Hackney, Kyle J.
author_sort Bradley, Adam P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ambulation devices may differ in their utility, muscle activation patterns, and how they affect regional blood flow. This study aimed to evaluate popliteal blood flow and vessel dimensions in response to ambulation with a hands-free crutch (HFC), axillary crutches (AC), a medical kneeling scooter (MKS), and regular walking in healthy adults. METHODS: HFC, AC, MKS, and regular walking were completed in a random order by 40 adults aged 18-45 years. Participants ambulated at a comfortable pace for 10 minutes with each device. At baseline and immediately following each trial, a trained operator used diagnostic ultrasonography to capture popliteal vein and artery dimensional and flow characteristics. RESULTS: Significant increases were observed from baseline (0.65 ± 0.23 cm) in venous diameter following walking (0.71 ± 0.21 cm, P = .012) and MKS (0.73 ± 0.21 cm, P = .003). Venous blood flow was also significantly different between conditions (P = .009) but was only greater following walking (124 ± 79 mL/min) compared to MKS (90 ± 64 mL/min, P = .021). No differences were observed in arterial dimensions between ambulation conditions. Significant increases were found in arterial blood flow from baseline (107 ± 69 mL/min) following walking (184 ± 97 mL/min, P < .001) and HFC (163 ± 86 mL/min, P < .001). Arterial blood flow following walking was greater than AC (132 ± 72 mL/min, P = .016) and MKS (128 ± 74 mL/min, P = .003). CONCLUSION: We found an average decrease in venous time-averaged mean velocity between walking and use of the MKS, but no such decrease with either HFCs or use of ACs in this healthy experimental cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic comparative study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9749042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97490422022-12-15 Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices Bradley, Adam P. Roehl, Alexis S. McGrath, Ryan Smith, Joseph Hackney, Kyle J. Foot Ankle Orthop Article BACKGROUND: Ambulation devices may differ in their utility, muscle activation patterns, and how they affect regional blood flow. This study aimed to evaluate popliteal blood flow and vessel dimensions in response to ambulation with a hands-free crutch (HFC), axillary crutches (AC), a medical kneeling scooter (MKS), and regular walking in healthy adults. METHODS: HFC, AC, MKS, and regular walking were completed in a random order by 40 adults aged 18-45 years. Participants ambulated at a comfortable pace for 10 minutes with each device. At baseline and immediately following each trial, a trained operator used diagnostic ultrasonography to capture popliteal vein and artery dimensional and flow characteristics. RESULTS: Significant increases were observed from baseline (0.65 ± 0.23 cm) in venous diameter following walking (0.71 ± 0.21 cm, P = .012) and MKS (0.73 ± 0.21 cm, P = .003). Venous blood flow was also significantly different between conditions (P = .009) but was only greater following walking (124 ± 79 mL/min) compared to MKS (90 ± 64 mL/min, P = .021). No differences were observed in arterial dimensions between ambulation conditions. Significant increases were found in arterial blood flow from baseline (107 ± 69 mL/min) following walking (184 ± 97 mL/min, P < .001) and HFC (163 ± 86 mL/min, P < .001). Arterial blood flow following walking was greater than AC (132 ± 72 mL/min, P = .016) and MKS (128 ± 74 mL/min, P = .003). CONCLUSION: We found an average decrease in venous time-averaged mean velocity between walking and use of the MKS, but no such decrease with either HFCs or use of ACs in this healthy experimental cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic comparative study. SAGE Publications 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9749042/ /pubmed/36533090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114221142784 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Bradley, Adam P.
Roehl, Alexis S.
McGrath, Ryan
Smith, Joseph
Hackney, Kyle J.
Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices
title Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices
title_full Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices
title_fullStr Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices
title_full_unstemmed Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices
title_short Popliteal Blood Flow With Lower-Extremity Injury Mobility Devices
title_sort popliteal blood flow with lower-extremity injury mobility devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114221142784
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleyadamp poplitealbloodflowwithlowerextremityinjurymobilitydevices
AT roehlalexiss poplitealbloodflowwithlowerextremityinjurymobilitydevices
AT mcgrathryan poplitealbloodflowwithlowerextremityinjurymobilitydevices
AT smithjoseph poplitealbloodflowwithlowerextremityinjurymobilitydevices
AT hackneykylej poplitealbloodflowwithlowerextremityinjurymobilitydevices