Assessing public–private procurement practices for medical commodities in Dar Es Salaam: a situation analysis

BACKGROUND: In Tanzania, the Medical Stores Department is the principal pharmaceutical provider to public health facilities throughout the country. However, growing demand from health facilities has proved difficult to satisfy and stock-outs at health facilities are frequent. The aim of the current study was to conduct a situation analysis of the procedures and practices of procuring medicines and medical supplies from private suppliers in the Dar es Salaam region when those commodities are unavailable at the Medical Stores Department. METHODS: A mixed-method approach including qualitative and quantitative methods was applied to understand procurement procedures and practices and private suppliers’ performance at district level. Qualitative interviews with suppliers and district authorities, and a review of inventory documents at store level was conducted between February and March 2018. The quantitative approach included a review and analyses of relevant procurement documents from the 2016/2017 financial year to explore the funds used to procure health commodities from the private sector. The ten most frequently mandated private suppliers were assessed in more detail focusing on cost, quality and availability of medicines and lead times and delivery. RESULTS: A lack of consistency and written guidelines for procuring medicines and medical supplies from the private sector was observed. The procurement process was bureaucratic and lengthy requiring multiple steps between health facilities, suppliers and district authorities. A significant number of people were involved requiring a minimum of 13 signatures and 16 steps from order preparation to approval. Only 17 of 77 prequalified private suppliers received orders from public health facilities. The criteria for choosing which supplier to use were unclear. Completed orders amounted to USD 663,491. The bureaucratic process drove councils and healthcare facilities towards alternative ways to procure health commodities when Medical Stores Department stock-outs occurred. CONCLUSION: The procurement procedure outside the Medical Stores Department is inefficient and cumbersome, often circumventing government regulations. General lack of accountability renders the process susceptible to leakage of funds and medicines. Increasing the transparency and efficiency of procurement procedures from the private sector with a prime vendor system would help to better manage Medical Stores Department stock-outs and help improve health care services overall.