Cargando…

Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: It is challenging to identify sepsis in the emergency department, in part due to the non-specific presentation of septic patients. Current clinical sepsis screening tools rely on vital signs but many patients present with near normal vital signs and are therefore not identified as septic....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsson, Eric A., Wallgren, Ulrika M., Su, Anna, Short, Jennifer, Kurland, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00759-6
_version_ 1784849987398533120
author Larsson, Eric A.
Wallgren, Ulrika M.
Su, Anna
Short, Jennifer
Kurland, Lisa
author_facet Larsson, Eric A.
Wallgren, Ulrika M.
Su, Anna
Short, Jennifer
Kurland, Lisa
author_sort Larsson, Eric A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is challenging to identify sepsis in the emergency department, in part due to the non-specific presentation of septic patients. Current clinical sepsis screening tools rely on vital signs but many patients present with near normal vital signs and are therefore not identified as septic. This suggests that variables, e.g. signs and symptoms, need to be included to improve sepsis detection in the emergency department. Our hypothesis was that the presentation of sepsis differs based age and sex. The potential differences in presentation could be used to apply to future sepsis screening tools. The aim was to analyze the prevalence of keywords reflecting the presentation of septic patients in the emergency department in relation to age and sex. METHOD: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Keywords reflecting sepsis presentation to the emergency department were quantified and compared between age categories and the sex. 479 patients admitted to the emergency department of Södersjukhuset, Stockholm during 2013 and discharged with an ICD-10 code consistent with sepsis were included. We adjusted for multiple comparisons by applying Bonferroni-adjusted significance levels for all comparisons. RESULT: “Pain” and “risk factors for sepsis” were significantly more common among patients younger than 65 years as compared with those 75 years and older: (n = 87/137; 63.5% vs n = 99/240; 41.3%, P-value < 0.000) and (n = 74/137; 54.0% vs 55/240; 22.9%, P-value < 0.000) respectively. “Risk factors for sepsis” was also significantly more common among patients between 65 and 74 years as compared with those 75 years and older: (n = 43/102; 42.2% vs 55/240; 22.9%, P-value < 0.000). “Pain” and “gastrointestinal symptoms” were significantly more common among women as compared with men: (n = 128/224; 57.1% vs n = 102/255; 40.0%, P-value < 0.000) and (n = 82/244; 36.6% vs n = 55/255; 21.6%, P-value < 0.000) respectively. CONCLUSION: The keywords “pain” and “risk factors for sepsis” were more common among younger patients and “pain” and “gastrointestinal symptoms” were more common among women. However, most keywords had a similar prevalence irrespective of age and sex. The results could potentially be used to augment sepsis screening tools or clinical decision tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00759-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9749171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97491712022-12-15 Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study Larsson, Eric A. Wallgren, Ulrika M. Su, Anna Short, Jennifer Kurland, Lisa BMC Emerg Med Research OBJECTIVE: It is challenging to identify sepsis in the emergency department, in part due to the non-specific presentation of septic patients. Current clinical sepsis screening tools rely on vital signs but many patients present with near normal vital signs and are therefore not identified as septic. This suggests that variables, e.g. signs and symptoms, need to be included to improve sepsis detection in the emergency department. Our hypothesis was that the presentation of sepsis differs based age and sex. The potential differences in presentation could be used to apply to future sepsis screening tools. The aim was to analyze the prevalence of keywords reflecting the presentation of septic patients in the emergency department in relation to age and sex. METHOD: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Keywords reflecting sepsis presentation to the emergency department were quantified and compared between age categories and the sex. 479 patients admitted to the emergency department of Södersjukhuset, Stockholm during 2013 and discharged with an ICD-10 code consistent with sepsis were included. We adjusted for multiple comparisons by applying Bonferroni-adjusted significance levels for all comparisons. RESULT: “Pain” and “risk factors for sepsis” were significantly more common among patients younger than 65 years as compared with those 75 years and older: (n = 87/137; 63.5% vs n = 99/240; 41.3%, P-value < 0.000) and (n = 74/137; 54.0% vs 55/240; 22.9%, P-value < 0.000) respectively. “Risk factors for sepsis” was also significantly more common among patients between 65 and 74 years as compared with those 75 years and older: (n = 43/102; 42.2% vs 55/240; 22.9%, P-value < 0.000). “Pain” and “gastrointestinal symptoms” were significantly more common among women as compared with men: (n = 128/224; 57.1% vs n = 102/255; 40.0%, P-value < 0.000) and (n = 82/244; 36.6% vs n = 55/255; 21.6%, P-value < 0.000) respectively. CONCLUSION: The keywords “pain” and “risk factors for sepsis” were more common among younger patients and “pain” and “gastrointestinal symptoms” were more common among women. However, most keywords had a similar prevalence irrespective of age and sex. The results could potentially be used to augment sepsis screening tools or clinical decision tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00759-6. BioMed Central 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9749171/ /pubmed/36513984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00759-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Larsson, Eric A.
Wallgren, Ulrika M.
Su, Anna
Short, Jennifer
Kurland, Lisa
Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study
title Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_short Presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_sort presentation of the septic patient to the emergency department with respect to age and sex – a retrospective cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00759-6
work_keys_str_mv AT larssonerica presentationofthesepticpatienttotheemergencydepartmentwithrespecttoageandsexaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT wallgrenulrikam presentationofthesepticpatienttotheemergencydepartmentwithrespecttoageandsexaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT suanna presentationofthesepticpatienttotheemergencydepartmentwithrespecttoageandsexaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT shortjennifer presentationofthesepticpatienttotheemergencydepartmentwithrespecttoageandsexaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT kurlandlisa presentationofthesepticpatienttotheemergencydepartmentwithrespecttoageandsexaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy