Cargando…
Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
BACKGROUND: Clinical staging proposes that youth-onset mental disorders develop progressively, and that active treatment of earlier stages should prevent progression to more severe disorders. This retrospective cohort study examined the longitudinal relationships between clinical stages and multiple...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w |
_version_ | 1784849991962984448 |
---|---|
author | Capon, William Hickie, Ian B. Varidel, Mathew Prodan, Ante Crouse, Jacob J. Carpenter, Joanne S. Cross, Shane P. Nichles, Alissa Zmicerevska, Natalia Guastella, Adam J. Scott, Elizabeth M. Scott, Jan Shah, Jai Iorfino, Frank |
author_facet | Capon, William Hickie, Ian B. Varidel, Mathew Prodan, Ante Crouse, Jacob J. Carpenter, Joanne S. Cross, Shane P. Nichles, Alissa Zmicerevska, Natalia Guastella, Adam J. Scott, Elizabeth M. Scott, Jan Shah, Jai Iorfino, Frank |
author_sort | Capon, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical staging proposes that youth-onset mental disorders develop progressively, and that active treatment of earlier stages should prevent progression to more severe disorders. This retrospective cohort study examined the longitudinal relationships between clinical stages and multiple clinical and functional outcomes within the first 12 months of care. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information of 2901 young people who accessed mental health care at age 12–25 years was collected at predetermined timepoints (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). Initial clinical stage was used to define three fixed groups for analyses (stage 1a: ‘non-specific anxious or depressive symptoms’, 1b: ‘attenuated mood or psychotic syndromes’, 2+: ‘full-threshold mood or psychotic syndromes’). Logistic regression models, which controlled for age and follow-up time, were used to compare clinical and functional outcomes (role and social function, suicidal ideation, alcohol and substance misuse, physical health comorbidity, circadian disturbances) between staging groups within the initial 12 months of care. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 2093 young people aged 12–25 years were followed up at least once over the first 12 months of care, with 60.4% female and a baseline mean age of 18.16 years. Longitudinally, young people at stage 2+ were more likely to develop circadian disturbances (odds ratio [OR]=2.58; CI 1.60–4.17), compared with individuals at stage 1b. Additionally, stage 1b individuals were more likely to become disengaged from education/employment (OR=2.11, CI 1.36–3.28), develop suicidal ideations (OR=1.92; CI 1.30–2.84) and circadian disturbances (OR=1.94, CI 1.31–2.86), compared to stage 1a. By contrast, we found no relationship between clinical stage and the emergence of alcohol or substance misuse and physical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The differential rates of emergence of poor clinical and functional outcomes between early versus late clinical stages support the clinical staging model's assumptions about illness trajectories for mood and psychotic syndromes. The greater risk of progression to poor outcomes in those who present with more severe syndromes may be used to guide specific intervention packages. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9749194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97491942022-12-15 Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care Capon, William Hickie, Ian B. Varidel, Mathew Prodan, Ante Crouse, Jacob J. Carpenter, Joanne S. Cross, Shane P. Nichles, Alissa Zmicerevska, Natalia Guastella, Adam J. Scott, Elizabeth M. Scott, Jan Shah, Jai Iorfino, Frank BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical staging proposes that youth-onset mental disorders develop progressively, and that active treatment of earlier stages should prevent progression to more severe disorders. This retrospective cohort study examined the longitudinal relationships between clinical stages and multiple clinical and functional outcomes within the first 12 months of care. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information of 2901 young people who accessed mental health care at age 12–25 years was collected at predetermined timepoints (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). Initial clinical stage was used to define three fixed groups for analyses (stage 1a: ‘non-specific anxious or depressive symptoms’, 1b: ‘attenuated mood or psychotic syndromes’, 2+: ‘full-threshold mood or psychotic syndromes’). Logistic regression models, which controlled for age and follow-up time, were used to compare clinical and functional outcomes (role and social function, suicidal ideation, alcohol and substance misuse, physical health comorbidity, circadian disturbances) between staging groups within the initial 12 months of care. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 2093 young people aged 12–25 years were followed up at least once over the first 12 months of care, with 60.4% female and a baseline mean age of 18.16 years. Longitudinally, young people at stage 2+ were more likely to develop circadian disturbances (odds ratio [OR]=2.58; CI 1.60–4.17), compared with individuals at stage 1b. Additionally, stage 1b individuals were more likely to become disengaged from education/employment (OR=2.11, CI 1.36–3.28), develop suicidal ideations (OR=1.92; CI 1.30–2.84) and circadian disturbances (OR=1.94, CI 1.31–2.86), compared to stage 1a. By contrast, we found no relationship between clinical stage and the emergence of alcohol or substance misuse and physical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The differential rates of emergence of poor clinical and functional outcomes between early versus late clinical stages support the clinical staging model's assumptions about illness trajectories for mood and psychotic syndromes. The greater risk of progression to poor outcomes in those who present with more severe syndromes may be used to guide specific intervention packages. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w. BioMed Central 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9749194/ /pubmed/36514113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Capon, William Hickie, Ian B. Varidel, Mathew Prodan, Ante Crouse, Jacob J. Carpenter, Joanne S. Cross, Shane P. Nichles, Alissa Zmicerevska, Natalia Guastella, Adam J. Scott, Elizabeth M. Scott, Jan Shah, Jai Iorfino, Frank Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care |
title | Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care |
title_full | Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care |
title_fullStr | Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care |
title_short | Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care |
title_sort | clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caponwilliam clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT hickieianb clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT varidelmathew clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT prodanante clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT crousejacobj clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT carpenterjoannes clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT crossshanep clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT nichlesalissa clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT zmicerevskanatalia clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT guastellaadamj clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT scottelizabethm clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT scottjan clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT shahjai clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare AT iorfinofrank clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare |