Cargando…

Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care

BACKGROUND: Clinical staging proposes that youth-onset mental disorders develop progressively, and that active treatment of earlier stages should prevent progression to more severe disorders. This retrospective cohort study examined the longitudinal relationships between clinical stages and multiple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capon, William, Hickie, Ian B., Varidel, Mathew, Prodan, Ante, Crouse, Jacob J., Carpenter, Joanne S., Cross, Shane P., Nichles, Alissa, Zmicerevska, Natalia, Guastella, Adam J., Scott, Elizabeth M., Scott, Jan, Shah, Jai, Iorfino, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w
_version_ 1784849991962984448
author Capon, William
Hickie, Ian B.
Varidel, Mathew
Prodan, Ante
Crouse, Jacob J.
Carpenter, Joanne S.
Cross, Shane P.
Nichles, Alissa
Zmicerevska, Natalia
Guastella, Adam J.
Scott, Elizabeth M.
Scott, Jan
Shah, Jai
Iorfino, Frank
author_facet Capon, William
Hickie, Ian B.
Varidel, Mathew
Prodan, Ante
Crouse, Jacob J.
Carpenter, Joanne S.
Cross, Shane P.
Nichles, Alissa
Zmicerevska, Natalia
Guastella, Adam J.
Scott, Elizabeth M.
Scott, Jan
Shah, Jai
Iorfino, Frank
author_sort Capon, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical staging proposes that youth-onset mental disorders develop progressively, and that active treatment of earlier stages should prevent progression to more severe disorders. This retrospective cohort study examined the longitudinal relationships between clinical stages and multiple clinical and functional outcomes within the first 12 months of care. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information of 2901 young people who accessed mental health care at age 12–25 years was collected at predetermined timepoints (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). Initial clinical stage was used to define three fixed groups for analyses (stage 1a: ‘non-specific anxious or depressive symptoms’, 1b: ‘attenuated mood or psychotic syndromes’, 2+: ‘full-threshold mood or psychotic syndromes’). Logistic regression models, which controlled for age and follow-up time, were used to compare clinical and functional outcomes (role and social function, suicidal ideation, alcohol and substance misuse, physical health comorbidity, circadian disturbances) between staging groups within the initial 12 months of care. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 2093 young people aged 12–25 years were followed up at least once over the first 12 months of care, with 60.4% female and a baseline mean age of 18.16 years. Longitudinally, young people at stage 2+ were more likely to develop circadian disturbances (odds ratio [OR]=2.58; CI 1.60–4.17), compared with individuals at stage 1b. Additionally, stage 1b individuals were more likely to become disengaged from education/employment (OR=2.11, CI 1.36–3.28), develop suicidal ideations (OR=1.92; CI 1.30–2.84) and circadian disturbances (OR=1.94, CI 1.31–2.86), compared to stage 1a. By contrast, we found no relationship between clinical stage and the emergence of alcohol or substance misuse and physical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The differential rates of emergence of poor clinical and functional outcomes between early versus late clinical stages support the clinical staging model's assumptions about illness trajectories for mood and psychotic syndromes. The greater risk of progression to poor outcomes in those who present with more severe syndromes may be used to guide specific intervention packages. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9749194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97491942022-12-15 Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care Capon, William Hickie, Ian B. Varidel, Mathew Prodan, Ante Crouse, Jacob J. Carpenter, Joanne S. Cross, Shane P. Nichles, Alissa Zmicerevska, Natalia Guastella, Adam J. Scott, Elizabeth M. Scott, Jan Shah, Jai Iorfino, Frank BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical staging proposes that youth-onset mental disorders develop progressively, and that active treatment of earlier stages should prevent progression to more severe disorders. This retrospective cohort study examined the longitudinal relationships between clinical stages and multiple clinical and functional outcomes within the first 12 months of care. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information of 2901 young people who accessed mental health care at age 12–25 years was collected at predetermined timepoints (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). Initial clinical stage was used to define three fixed groups for analyses (stage 1a: ‘non-specific anxious or depressive symptoms’, 1b: ‘attenuated mood or psychotic syndromes’, 2+: ‘full-threshold mood or psychotic syndromes’). Logistic regression models, which controlled for age and follow-up time, were used to compare clinical and functional outcomes (role and social function, suicidal ideation, alcohol and substance misuse, physical health comorbidity, circadian disturbances) between staging groups within the initial 12 months of care. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 2093 young people aged 12–25 years were followed up at least once over the first 12 months of care, with 60.4% female and a baseline mean age of 18.16 years. Longitudinally, young people at stage 2+ were more likely to develop circadian disturbances (odds ratio [OR]=2.58; CI 1.60–4.17), compared with individuals at stage 1b. Additionally, stage 1b individuals were more likely to become disengaged from education/employment (OR=2.11, CI 1.36–3.28), develop suicidal ideations (OR=1.92; CI 1.30–2.84) and circadian disturbances (OR=1.94, CI 1.31–2.86), compared to stage 1a. By contrast, we found no relationship between clinical stage and the emergence of alcohol or substance misuse and physical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The differential rates of emergence of poor clinical and functional outcomes between early versus late clinical stages support the clinical staging model's assumptions about illness trajectories for mood and psychotic syndromes. The greater risk of progression to poor outcomes in those who present with more severe syndromes may be used to guide specific intervention packages. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w. BioMed Central 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9749194/ /pubmed/36514113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Capon, William
Hickie, Ian B.
Varidel, Mathew
Prodan, Ante
Crouse, Jacob J.
Carpenter, Joanne S.
Cross, Shane P.
Nichles, Alissa
Zmicerevska, Natalia
Guastella, Adam J.
Scott, Elizabeth M.
Scott, Jan
Shah, Jai
Iorfino, Frank
Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
title Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
title_full Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
title_fullStr Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
title_full_unstemmed Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
title_short Clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
title_sort clinical staging and the differential risks for clinical and functional outcomes in young people presenting for youth mental health care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02666-w
work_keys_str_mv AT caponwilliam clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT hickieianb clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT varidelmathew clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT prodanante clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT crousejacobj clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT carpenterjoannes clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT crossshanep clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT nichlesalissa clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT zmicerevskanatalia clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT guastellaadamj clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT scottelizabethm clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT scottjan clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT shahjai clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare
AT iorfinofrank clinicalstagingandthedifferentialrisksforclinicalandfunctionaloutcomesinyoungpeoplepresentingforyouthmentalhealthcare