Cargando…

An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for identifying ventricular premature contraction during sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND: Ventricular premature complex (VPC) is a common arrhythmia in clinical practice. VPC could trigger ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation or VPC-induced cardiomyopathy in susceptible patients. Existing screening methods require prolonged monitoring and are limited by cost and low yield whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Sheng-Nan, Tseng, Yu-Heng, Chen, Jien-Jiun, Chiu, Fu-Chun, Tsai, Chin-Feng, Hwang, Juey-Jen, Wang, Yi-Chih, Tsai, Chia-Ti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00929-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Ventricular premature complex (VPC) is a common arrhythmia in clinical practice. VPC could trigger ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation or VPC-induced cardiomyopathy in susceptible patients. Existing screening methods require prolonged monitoring and are limited by cost and low yield when the frequency of VPC is low. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is low cost and widely used. We aimed to identify patients with VPC during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning-based ECG reading. METHODS: We developed AI-enabled ECG algorithm using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the ECG signature of VPC presented during NSR using standard 12-lead ECGs. A total of 2515 ECG records from 398 patients with VPC were collected. Among them, only ECG records of NSR without VPC (1617 ECG records) were parsed. RESULTS: A total of 753 normal ECG records from 387 patients under NSR were used for comparison. Both image and time-series datasets were parsed for the training process by the CNN models. The computer architectures were optimized to select the best model for the training process. Both the single-input image model (InceptionV3, accuracy: 0.895, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.683–0.937) and multi-input time-series model (ResNet50V2, accuracy: 0.880, 95% CI 0.646–0.943) yielded satisfactory results for VPC prediction, both of which were better than the single-input time-series model (ResNet50V2, accuracy: 0.840, 95% CI 0.629–0.952). CONCLUSIONS: AI-enabled ECG acquired during NSR permits rapid identification at point of care of individuals with VPC and has the potential to predict VPC episodes automatically rather than traditional long-time monitoring.