Cargando…

Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff

Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the awareness and measures taken to prevent infections of blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) among emergency department (ED) staff at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. Method A cross-sectional research approach was adopted. The study recruited a sample o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aloushan, Amirah F, Alharthi, Falwah, Alismail, Mohammed I, Alhaqbani, Abdulrahman A, Almutairi, Ibrahim H, Alashgar, Shahad, Ahmed, Noura, Alebrahaimi, Ftoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523737
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31479
_version_ 1784850041313165312
author Aloushan, Amirah F
Alharthi, Falwah
Alismail, Mohammed I
Alhaqbani, Abdulrahman A
Almutairi, Ibrahim H
Alashgar, Shahad
Ahmed, Noura
Alebrahaimi, Ftoon
author_facet Aloushan, Amirah F
Alharthi, Falwah
Alismail, Mohammed I
Alhaqbani, Abdulrahman A
Almutairi, Ibrahim H
Alashgar, Shahad
Ahmed, Noura
Alebrahaimi, Ftoon
author_sort Aloushan, Amirah F
collection PubMed
description Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the awareness and measures taken to prevent infections of blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) among emergency department (ED) staff at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. Method A cross-sectional research approach was adopted. The study recruited a sample of 200 ED medical staff from King Abdul Aziz Medical City in Riyadh city. A self-filled questionnaire was used to elicit data related to awareness and concerns, in addition to the protection strategies adopted by the ED medical staff. The gathered data was analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS, v. 26). Results The study found that 42.5% (n=85) of the emergency room (ER) staff did not use regular eyewear at all, 30% (n=60) did not use face shields at all, and about 75.5% of the enrolled ED staff successfully converted to double-gloving. In addition, it was found that patients with active AIDS (64%), patients with active hepatitis (60.5%), and patients with known HIV infection (60%) were the most reported factors influencing the decision to use double-gloving. Moreover, it was found that the highest reported reasons for not double-gloving were that double-gloving is not necessary (56%, n=112) and double-gloving decreases hand sensation (31%, n=62).Finally, the study found that the most reported reasons for not using barriers other than gloves precautions were non-necessity of barriers other than gloves (31% (n=62) and non-availability (26.5%, n=53). Conclusion The study concluded that ER medical staff in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City in Riyadh perceived a high level of lifetime risk of infection when performing procedures and that there is a lack of education and awareness of ER staff related to using personal protective equipment (PPE) and double-gloving when performing procedures in the ER.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9749427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97494272022-12-14 Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff Aloushan, Amirah F Alharthi, Falwah Alismail, Mohammed I Alhaqbani, Abdulrahman A Almutairi, Ibrahim H Alashgar, Shahad Ahmed, Noura Alebrahaimi, Ftoon Cureus Emergency Medicine Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the awareness and measures taken to prevent infections of blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) among emergency department (ED) staff at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. Method A cross-sectional research approach was adopted. The study recruited a sample of 200 ED medical staff from King Abdul Aziz Medical City in Riyadh city. A self-filled questionnaire was used to elicit data related to awareness and concerns, in addition to the protection strategies adopted by the ED medical staff. The gathered data was analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS, v. 26). Results The study found that 42.5% (n=85) of the emergency room (ER) staff did not use regular eyewear at all, 30% (n=60) did not use face shields at all, and about 75.5% of the enrolled ED staff successfully converted to double-gloving. In addition, it was found that patients with active AIDS (64%), patients with active hepatitis (60.5%), and patients with known HIV infection (60%) were the most reported factors influencing the decision to use double-gloving. Moreover, it was found that the highest reported reasons for not double-gloving were that double-gloving is not necessary (56%, n=112) and double-gloving decreases hand sensation (31%, n=62).Finally, the study found that the most reported reasons for not using barriers other than gloves precautions were non-necessity of barriers other than gloves (31% (n=62) and non-availability (26.5%, n=53). Conclusion The study concluded that ER medical staff in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City in Riyadh perceived a high level of lifetime risk of infection when performing procedures and that there is a lack of education and awareness of ER staff related to using personal protective equipment (PPE) and double-gloving when performing procedures in the ER. Cureus 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9749427/ /pubmed/36523737 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31479 Text en Copyright © 2022, Aloushan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Aloushan, Amirah F
Alharthi, Falwah
Alismail, Mohammed I
Alhaqbani, Abdulrahman A
Almutairi, Ibrahim H
Alashgar, Shahad
Ahmed, Noura
Alebrahaimi, Ftoon
Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff
title Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff
title_full Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff
title_fullStr Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff
title_full_unstemmed Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff
title_short Awareness, Concerns, and Protection Strategies Against Blood-Borne Viruses Among Emergency Medicine Staff
title_sort awareness, concerns, and protection strategies against blood-borne viruses among emergency medicine staff
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523737
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31479
work_keys_str_mv AT aloushanamirahf awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff
AT alharthifalwah awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff
AT alismailmohammedi awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff
AT alhaqbaniabdulrahmana awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff
AT almutairiibrahimh awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff
AT alashgarshahad awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff
AT ahmednoura awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff
AT alebrahaimiftoon awarenessconcernsandprotectionstrategiesagainstbloodbornevirusesamongemergencymedicinestaff