Cargando…

Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVE: Smell and taste alteration are closely linked to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and may be associated with a more indolent disease course. Serologic response rates among individuals with mild disease remains limited. We sought to identify whether chemosensory changes associated with COVID-19 w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Overdevest, Jonathan B., Irace, Alexandria L., Mazzanti, Valeria, Oh, Eun Jeong, Joseph, Paule V., Devanand, Davangere P., Bitan, Zachary C., Hod, Eldad A., Gudis, David A., Chiuzan, Codruta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274611
_version_ 1784850156941737984
author Overdevest, Jonathan B.
Irace, Alexandria L.
Mazzanti, Valeria
Oh, Eun Jeong
Joseph, Paule V.
Devanand, Davangere P.
Bitan, Zachary C.
Hod, Eldad A.
Gudis, David A.
Chiuzan, Codruta
author_facet Overdevest, Jonathan B.
Irace, Alexandria L.
Mazzanti, Valeria
Oh, Eun Jeong
Joseph, Paule V.
Devanand, Davangere P.
Bitan, Zachary C.
Hod, Eldad A.
Gudis, David A.
Chiuzan, Codruta
author_sort Overdevest, Jonathan B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Smell and taste alteration are closely linked to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and may be associated with a more indolent disease course. Serologic response rates among individuals with mild disease remains limited. We sought to identify whether chemosensory changes associated with COVID-19 were predictive of a serologic response. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The sample consisted of 306 adults (≥18 years old) volunteering for convalescent plasma donation following perceived COVID-19 illness from April-June 2020. Documentation of COVID-19 PCR status, clinical symptoms at time of illness, and treatment course occurred at the time of serologic analysis, where we assessed chemosensory function using patient-perceived deficits. We implemented previously validated ELISA screening to determine serologic status regarding anti-Spike immunoglobulins. Statistical analysis using stepwise logistic models were employed to identify predictive factors of serologic response. RESULTS: Of 306 patients undergoing serologic and chemosensory evaluation, 196 (64.1%) and 195 (63.7%) reported subjective olfactory and taste dysfunction, respectively, during the first two weeks of COVID-19 infection. In unadjusted models, the odds of developing suprathreshold IgG antibody titers were 1.98 times higher among those who reported altered smell (95% CI 1.14–3.42, p = 0.014) and 2.02 times higher among those with altered taste (95% CI 1.17–3.48, p = 0.011) compared to those with normal smell and taste. Multivariable logistic models adjusting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, symptom duration, smoking status and comorbidities index demonstrated that altered smell and taste remained significant predictors of positive anti-spike IgG response (smell OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.05–3.44, p = 0.033; taste OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.12–3.61, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Subjective chemosensory dysfunction, as self-reported smell or taste deficiency, is highly predictive of serologic response following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This information may be useful for patient counseling. Additional longitudinal research should be performed to better understand the onset and duration of the serologic response in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97500162022-12-15 Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 Overdevest, Jonathan B. Irace, Alexandria L. Mazzanti, Valeria Oh, Eun Jeong Joseph, Paule V. Devanand, Davangere P. Bitan, Zachary C. Hod, Eldad A. Gudis, David A. Chiuzan, Codruta PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Smell and taste alteration are closely linked to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and may be associated with a more indolent disease course. Serologic response rates among individuals with mild disease remains limited. We sought to identify whether chemosensory changes associated with COVID-19 were predictive of a serologic response. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The sample consisted of 306 adults (≥18 years old) volunteering for convalescent plasma donation following perceived COVID-19 illness from April-June 2020. Documentation of COVID-19 PCR status, clinical symptoms at time of illness, and treatment course occurred at the time of serologic analysis, where we assessed chemosensory function using patient-perceived deficits. We implemented previously validated ELISA screening to determine serologic status regarding anti-Spike immunoglobulins. Statistical analysis using stepwise logistic models were employed to identify predictive factors of serologic response. RESULTS: Of 306 patients undergoing serologic and chemosensory evaluation, 196 (64.1%) and 195 (63.7%) reported subjective olfactory and taste dysfunction, respectively, during the first two weeks of COVID-19 infection. In unadjusted models, the odds of developing suprathreshold IgG antibody titers were 1.98 times higher among those who reported altered smell (95% CI 1.14–3.42, p = 0.014) and 2.02 times higher among those with altered taste (95% CI 1.17–3.48, p = 0.011) compared to those with normal smell and taste. Multivariable logistic models adjusting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, symptom duration, smoking status and comorbidities index demonstrated that altered smell and taste remained significant predictors of positive anti-spike IgG response (smell OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.05–3.44, p = 0.033; taste OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.12–3.61, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Subjective chemosensory dysfunction, as self-reported smell or taste deficiency, is highly predictive of serologic response following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This information may be useful for patient counseling. Additional longitudinal research should be performed to better understand the onset and duration of the serologic response in these patients. Public Library of Science 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9750016/ /pubmed/36516124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274611 Text en © 2022 Overdevest et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Overdevest, Jonathan B.
Irace, Alexandria L.
Mazzanti, Valeria
Oh, Eun Jeong
Joseph, Paule V.
Devanand, Davangere P.
Bitan, Zachary C.
Hod, Eldad A.
Gudis, David A.
Chiuzan, Codruta
Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
title Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
title_full Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
title_short Chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
title_sort chemosensory deficits are best predictor of serologic response among individuals infected with sars-cov-2
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274611
work_keys_str_mv AT overdevestjonathanb chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT iracealexandrial chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT mazzantivaleria chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT oheunjeong chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT josephpaulev chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT devananddavangerep chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT bitanzacharyc chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT hodeldada chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT gudisdavida chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2
AT chiuzancodruta chemosensorydeficitsarebestpredictorofserologicresponseamongindividualsinfectedwithsarscov2